# Modular specification of monads through higher-order presentations

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a modular framework for specifying monads with higher-order operations and equations, enabling structured language definitions like the lambda calculus, with formalization and effectiveness results.

## Contribution

It develops a new approach to defining monads via higher-order signatures and equations, establishing modularity and effectiveness of such specifications.

## Key findings

- Defines 2-signatures for monads with binding operations and equations.
- Shows that effective 2-signatures have initial models representing specified monads.
- Provides a computer formalization of the theoretical framework.

## Abstract

In their work on second-order equational logic, Fiore and Hur have studied presentations of simply typed languages by generating binding constructions and equations among them. To each pair consisting of a binding signature and a set of equations, they associate a category of `models', and they give a monadicity result which implies that this category has an initial object, which is the language presented by the pair. In the present work, we propose, for the untyped setting, a variant of their approach where monads and modules over them are the central notions. More precisely, we study, for monads over sets, presentations by generating (`higher-order') operations and equations among them. We consider a notion of 2-signature which allows to specify a monad with a family of binding operations subject to a family of equations, as is the case for the paradigmatic example of the lambda calculus, specified by its two standard constructions (application and abstraction) subject to $\beta$- and $\eta$-equalities. Such a 2-signature is hence a pair $(\Sigma,E)$ of a binding signature $\Sigma$ and a family $E$ of equations for $\Sigma$. This notion of 2-signature has been introduced earlier by Ahrens in a slightly different context. We associate, to each 2-signature $(\Sigma,E)$, a category of `models of $(\Sigma,E)$; and we say that a 2-signature is `effective' if this category has an initial object; the monad underlying this (essentially unique) object is the `monad specified by the 2-signature'. Not every 2-signature is effective; we identify a class of 2-signatures, which we call `algebraic', that are effective. Importantly, our 2-signatures together with their models enjoy `modularity': when we glue (algebraic) 2-signatures together, their initial models are glued accordingly. We provide a computer formalization for our main results.