Weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators
Dijana Mosic, Daochang Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces the weighted weak group inverse for operators on Hilbert spaces, extending the concept from matrices, with new characterizations, representations, and applications to binary relations.
Contribution
It presents the first definition and analysis of the weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators, expanding the theory beyond matrices.
Findings
Defined the weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators
Provided characterizations and representations of the inverse
Applied the inverse to define and analyze binary relations
Abstract
We present the weighted weak group inverse, which is a new generalized inverse of operators between two Hilbert spaces, introduced to extend weak group inverse for square matrices. Some characterizations and representations of the weighted weak group inverse are investigated. We also apply these results to define and study the weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator. Using the weak group inverse, we define and characterize various binary relations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Weighted weak group inverse for Hilbert space operators
Dijana Mosić111This author is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, grant no. 174007., Daochang Zhang 222This author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 61672149; No. 51507029; No. 61503072), and the Scientific and Technological Research Program Foundation of Jilin Province, China (No. JJKH20190690KJ).
Abstract
We present the weighted weak group inverse, which is a new generalized inverse of operators between two Hilbert spaces, introduced to extend weak group inverse for square matrices. Some characterizations and representations of the weighted weak group inverse are investigated. We also apply these results to define and study the weak group inverse for a Hilbert space operator. Using the weak group inverse, we define and characterize various binary relations.
Key words and phrases: weak group inverse, weighted core–EP inverse, Wg-Drazin inverse, Hilbert space.
2010 Mathematics subject classification: 47A62, 47A05, 15A09.
1 Introduction
Throughout this paper, let be the set of all bounded linear operators from to , where and are infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space. In the case that , we set . For , , , and represent the adjoint of , the null space, the range and the spectrum of , respectively. We call an idempotent if , and an orthogonal projector if . If and are closed subspaces, we denote by an idempotent on along , and by an orthogonal projector onto .
Let . There always exists such that , which is not unique in general and it is called an outer inverse of . The outer inverse is uniquely determined if we fix its range and kernel. For a subspace of and a subspace of , the unique outer inverse of with the prescribed range and the null space will be denoted by . We now present some special classes of outer inverses.
For a fixed operator , an operator is called Wg–Drazin invertible [4] if there exists a unique operator (denoted by ) such that
[TABLE]
In the case that and , then is the generalized Drazin inverse (or the Koliha-Drazin inverse) of [9]. We use and , respectively, to denote the sets of all Wg–Drazin invertible operators in and generalized Drazin invertible operators in .
The W-weighted Drazin inverse is a particular case of the Wg–Drazin inverse for which is nilpotent. The Drazin inverse is a special case of the generalized Drazin inverse for which is nilpotent (or equivalently , for some non-negative integer ). The smallest such is called the index of and it is denoted by . In the case that , is group invertible and the group inverse of is a special case of a Drazin inverse. The Drazin inverse is very useful, and its applications in automatics, probability, statistics, mathematical programming, numerical analysis, game theory, econometrics, control theory and so on, can be found in [2, 3]. For more recent results related to generalized Drazin inverse, W-weighted Drazin inverse and Drazin inverse see [16, 19, 20, 21].
Prasad and Mohana [15] introduced the core–EP inverse for a square matrix of arbitrary index, as a generalization of the core inverse restricted to a square matrix of index one [1]. The core–EP inverse was presented for generalized Drazin invertible operators on Hilbert spaces in [14].
As a generalization of the core–EP inverse of a square matrix to a rectangular matrix, the weighted core–EP inverse was given in [6]. In [13], the weighted core–EP inverse was defined for a g-Drazin invertible bounded linear operator between two Hilbert spaces, extending the concepts of the weighted core–EP inverse for a rectangular matrix [6].
Let and let be g-Drazin invertible. Then there exists the unique operator which satisfies conditions
[TABLE]
and it is called the weighted core–EP inverse of , denoted by . If and , then is the core–EP inverse of [14]. In the case that and , the core-EP inverse of is the core inverse of , denoted by . Recently, many results concerning the weighted core–EP and core–EP inverse appeared in papers [5, 7, 8, 11, 17, 22].
In [18], the weak group inverse was recently defined for square matrices of an arbitrary index and presented as a generalization of the group inverse.
We extend the definition of the weak group inverse of a square matrix to a Wg–Drazin invertible bounded linear operator between two Hilbert spaces and present a new generalized inverse, named the weighted weak group inverse. We obtain some properties of the weighted weak group inverse, in particular, an operator matrix representation, characterizations and representations of the weighted weak group inverse. As an application of these results, we present and characterize the weak group inverse of a generalized Drazin invertible bounded linear operator on a Hilbert space. Using the weak group inverse, we define and study several binary relations.
2 Weighted weak group inverse
In order to define the weighted weak group inverse of a Wg–Drazin invertible bounded linear operator between two Hilbert spaces as an extension of the weak group inverse of a square matrix, we need following auxiliary result.
Lemma 2.1**.**
[13]* Let and . Then*
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
*where , , and . In addition, *
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We first give algebraic definition of a new generalized inverse.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let and . Then the system of equations
[TABLE]
is consistent and it has the unique solution given by
[TABLE]
where and are represented as in (1) and (2), respectively.
Proof.
Using (1), (2), (4) and (6), we get
[TABLE]
and , that is, is a solution of the system (5).
If an operator satisfies (5), then
[TABLE]
and so is the unique solution of the system (5). ∎
For and in Theorem 2.1, we get the next consequence.
Corollary 2.1**.**
Let . Then the system of equations
[TABLE]
is consistent and it has the unique solution given by
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
* is invertible and is quasinilpotent.*
Definition 2.1**.**
Let and . The weighted weak group inverse of is defined as
[TABLE]
Definition 2.2**.**
Let . The weak group inverse of is defined as
[TABLE]
Remark that, by Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.1, the weighted weak group inverse is different from the g-Drazin inverse and weighted core–EP inverse. Hence, the weighted weak group and weak group inverses provide new classes of generalized inverses for operators. If and are finite dimensional, then, for , every operator has the weighted weak group inverse. For and , the weak group inverse of is the group inverse of .
We also have a definition of the weighted weak group inverse from a geometrical point of view.
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let and . The system of conditions
[TABLE]
is consistent and it has the unique solution .
Proof.
For , we have that is a projector onto along and , i.e. satisfies conditions (10).
Assume that two operators and satisfy conditions (10). Firstly, implies . Further, and give . Therefore, and only satisfies (10). ∎
Consequently, the geometrical approach is given now for the weak group inverse.
Corollary 2.2**.**
Let . The system of conditions
[TABLE]
is consistent and it has the unique solution .
We consider some idempotents determined by the weighted weak group inverse and observe that the weighted weak group inverse is an outer inverse.
Lemma 2.2**.**
Let and . Then:
- (i)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (ii)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (iii)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (iv)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (v)
.
Proof.
(i) Notice that is a projector onto along .
(v) Since and , we obtain
[TABLE]
Hence, is an outer inverse of with and . From
[TABLE]
we get which yields . By (1), (2) and (4), we show that . Now, we have that
[TABLE]
which gives , i.e. . Thus, .
Similarly, we verify parts (ii)–(iv). ∎
By Lemma 2.2, notice that the weak group inverse of is an outer inverse of .
Corollary 2.3**.**
Let . Then:
- (i)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (ii)
* is a projector onto along ;*
- (iii)
.
Several characterizations of the weighted weak group inverse are presented now.
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let and . Then, for , the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
* is the weighted weak group inverse of ;*
- (ii)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
- (iii)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
- (iv)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
Proof.
(i) (ii) (iii): The equality gives and . The rest is clear.
(ii) (i): It follows by .
(iii) (i): We have that .
(iii) (iv): Using and , we obtain these equivalences. ∎
Applying Theorem 2.3, we can characterize the weak group inverse in the following way.
Corollary 2.4**.**
Let . Then, for , the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
* is the weak group inverse of ;*
- (ii)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
- (iii)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
- (iv)
* satisfies*
[TABLE]
In the case that and are finite dimensional, the condition () of Theorem 2.3(iv) (Corollary 2.4(iv)) can be replaced with the equivalent condition for ( for ).
Using idempotents and orthogonal projectors, we present some representations of the weighted weak group inverse of in the next theorem.
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let and . Then the following statements holds:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
* is Moore–Penrose invertible, is group invertible and*
[TABLE]
- (iv)
;
- (v)
* is Moore–Penrose invertible and ;*
- (vi)
* is Moore–Penrose invertible and ;*
- (vii)
* is group invertible and .*
Proof.
(i) It follows by .
(ii) We get
[TABLE]
(iii) Let and be represented as in (1) and (2), respectively. Notice that the orthogonal projector has the following representation:
[TABLE]
We observe that WP_{R((AW)^{d})}=\left[\begin{array}[]{cc}W_{1}&0\\ 0&0\end{array}\right] is Moore–Penrose invertible and
[TABLE]
Because is g-Drazin invertible, then is generalized Drazin invertible,
[TABLE]
We now have that WA(WA)^{\tiny\tinyd⃝}WA=\left[\begin{array}[]{cc}W_{1}A_{1}&W_{1}A_{2}+W_{2}A_{3}\\ 0&0\end{array}\right] is group invertible and
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
(iv) Since is g-Drazin invertible, then is generalized Drazin invertible and so generalized Drazin invertible too. Hence, exists and, using (1) and (2),
[TABLE]
By (4), we obtain
[TABLE]
Similarly, we verify parts (v)–(vi). ∎
We have new representations for the weak group inverse by Theorem 2.4.
Corollary 2.5**.**
Let . Then the following statements holds:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
* is group invertible and *
- (iv)
;
- (v)
;
- (vi)
;
- (vii)
* is group invertible and .*
Proof.
Because is an orthogonal projector, notice that is Moore–Penrose invertible and . Then we can easily verify this result. ∎
Recall that with if and only if with if and only if with [4]. For the weighted core–EP inverse, the situation is similar in the case of the operator , but it is a little different for [13]. We see now that the weighted weak group inverse acts as the weighted core–EP inverse.
Theorem 2.5**.**
Let and let .
- (a)
Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
* is weighted weak group invertible with ;*
- (ii)
* is weak group invertible with *
In addition,
[TABLE]
- (b)
*If is *g-Drazin invertible, and are represented by (1) and (2), respectively, then
- (i)
* if and only if ;*
- (ii)
* if and only if .*
Proof.
(a) (i) (ii): By [13, Theorem 2.4], , which implies .
(ii) (i): We observe that
[TABLE]
(b) (i) It follows from the equalities
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(ii) Using (6) and
[TABLE]
we get that (ii) holds. ∎
Using the weak group inverses of and , we obtain the next formula for the weighted weak group inverses of .
Theorem 2.6**.**
Let and . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let and be given by (1) and (2), respectively. Then
[TABLE]
∎
We also investigate necessary and sufficient conditions for to hold.
Theorem 2.7**.**
Let and . If and are represented by (1) and (2), respectively, then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
.
In this case, .
Proof.
(i) (ii): The equalities
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
give if and only if which is equivalent to .
(ii) (iii): Firstly, we observe that
[TABLE]
Furthermore,
[TABLE]
is generalized Drazin invertible and, by Corollary 2.1,
[TABLE]
Thus, is equivalent to .
Notice that, by and (3), we obtain . ∎
Applying Theorem 2.7 and Theorem 2.5(b)(ii), we get equivalent conditions for to be satisfied. We observe that conditions (i)–(iii) appeared for the weak group inverse of a square matrix, but the condition (iv) is new even for matrix case.
Corollary 2.6**.**
Let . If is represented by (9), then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
;
- (iv)
.
In this case, .
Similarly as Theorem 2.7, we verify the next result.
Theorem 2.8**.**
Let and . If and are represented by (1) and (2), respectively, then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
.
3 Weighted weak group relations
Various types of partial orders and pre-orders were defined based on various types of generalized inverses [10, 12]. We firstly introduce a new binary relation using the weak group inverse.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let and . Then we say that is below under the weak group relation (denoted by ) if
[TABLE]
Remark that the relation ”” is not a partial order, because it is not antisymmetric. Indeed, if are quasinilpotent and , then and imply and . Hence, and , but .
By the following example, we see that the relation ”” is not transitive and so it is not a pre-order.
Example 3.1. Consider a block matrices
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
The equalities , , and give and . Because , the relation is not satisfied and thus ”” is not transitive.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let and . Then:
- (i)
* ;*
- (ii)
* .*
We can get characterizations of the weak group relation combining conditions of Lemma 3.1 from parts (i) and (ii).
For operators between two Hilbert spaces, we consider a weighted operator and define the following binary relations.
Definition 3.2**.**
Let and . If is g-Drazin invertible, then we say that
- (i)
if ,
- (ii)
if ,
- (iii)
if and ,
where is adequately considered on or .
Several characterizations of the relation are presented now.
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let , and . Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
* and ;*
- (iii)
the following matrix representations with respect to the orthogonal sums and hold
[TABLE]
where , , , and .
Proof.
(i) (ii): By the definition of the relation , this is clear.
(ii) (iii): Let and be given by (1) and (2), respectively. Suppose that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore, is equivalent to and . Further, the equalities
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and give .
(iii) (ii): This part can be checked by direct computations. ∎
In an analogy way, we characterize of the relation .
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let , and . Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
* and ;*
- (iii)
* and ;*
- (iv)
the following matrix representations with respect to the orthogonal sums and hold
[TABLE]
where and , , , and .
Combining Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, we get the next results.
Corollary 3.1**.**
Let , and . Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
the following matrix representations with respect to the orthogonal sums and hold
[TABLE]
where , , , , and .
Corollary 3.2**.**
Let and . Then the following statements are equivalent:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
the following matrix representations with respect to the orthogonal sum hold
[TABLE]
where is invertible, is quasinilpotent.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] O.M. Baksalary, G. Trenkler, Core inverse of matrices , Linear Multilinear Algebra 58(6) (2010), 681–697.
- 2[2] S. L. Campbell, Singular systems of differential equations II , Pitman, San Francisco - London - Melbourne, 1982.
- 3[3] S. L. Campbell, C. D. Meyer, Generalized inverses of linear transformations , Pitman, London, 1979.
- 4[4] A. Dajić, J. J. Koliha, The weighted g–Drazin inverse for operators , J. Australian Math. Soc. 82 (2007), 163–181.
- 5[5] D. E. Ferreyra, F. E. Levis, N. Thome, Maximal classes of matrices determining generalized inverses , Appl. Math. Comput. 333 (2018), 42–52.
- 6[6] D. E. Ferreyra, F. E. Levis, N. Thome, Revisiting the core EP inverse and its extension to rectangular matrices , Quaestiones Mathematicae 41(2) (2018), 265–281.
- 7[7] Y. Gao, J. Chen, Pseudo core inverses in rings with involution , Comm. Algebra 46(1) (2018), 38–50.
- 8[8] Y. Gao, J. Chen, P. Patrício, Representations and properties of the W-weighted core-EP inverse , Linear Multilinear Algebra (2018), https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2018.1535573.
