# Competitive percolation strategies for network recovery

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel competitive percolation model for network recovery that considers supply-demand dynamics and network structure, improving efficiency and cost-effectiveness in restoring critical infrastructure.

## Contribution

It develops a new recovery model that balances system structure and component details, better approximating realistic strategies and enhancing recovery efficiency.

## Key findings

- High redundancy reduces recovery cost and time.
- Decentralized supply improves recovery effectiveness.
- Traditional methods are less cost-efficient.

## Abstract

Restoring operation of critical infrastructure systems after catastrophic events is an important issue, inspiring work in multiple fields, including network science, civil engineering, and operations research. We consider the problem of finding the optimal order of repairing elements in power grids and similar infrastructure. Most existing methods either only consider system network structure, potentially ignoring important features, or incorporate component level details leading to complex optimization problems with limited scalability. We aim to narrow the gap between the two approaches. Analyzing realistic recovery strategies, we identify over- and undersupply penalties of commodities as primary contributions to reconstruction cost, and we demonstrate traditional network science methods, which maximize the largest connected component, are cost inefficient. We propose a novel competitive percolation recovery model accounting for node demand and supply, and network structure. Our model well approximates realistic recovery strategies, suppressing growth of the largest connected component through a process analogous to explosive percolation. Using synthetic power grids, we investigate the effect of network characteristics on recovery process efficiency. We learn that high structural redundancy enables reduced total cost and faster recovery, however, requires more information at each recovery step. We also confirm that decentralized supply in networks generally benefits recovery efforts.