Extension of KNTZ trick to non-rectangular representations
A.Morozov

TL;DR
This paper extends the KNTZ trick to non-rectangular representations in knot theory, simplifying formulas for complex representations and addressing multiplicities and gauge invariance issues.
Contribution
It introduces a reformulation of the universal-matrix precursor for non-rectangular representations, enabling simpler calculations in arborescent calculus.
Findings
Reformulated formulas for [r,1] representations
Demonstrated drastic simplification after reformulation
Addressed multiplicities and gauge invariance issues
Abstract
We claim that the recently discovered universal-matrix precursor for the functions, which define the differential expansion of colored polynomials for twist and double braid knots, can be extended from rectangular to non-rectangular representations. This case is far more interesting, because it involves multiplicities and associated mysterious gauge invariance of arborescent calculus. In this paper we make the very first step -- reformulate in this form the previously known formulas for the simplest non-rectangular representations [r,1] and demonstrate their drastic simplification after this reformulation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
MITP/TH-04/19
ITEP/TH-04/19
IITP/TH-04/19
Extension of KNTZ trick to non-rectangular representations
A.Morozov
MIPT, ITEP, & IITP, Moscow, Russia
ABSTRACT
We claim that the recently discovered universal-matrix precursor for the functions, which define the differential expansion of colored polynomials for twist and double braid knots, can be extended from rectangular to non-rectangular representations. This case is far more interesting, because it involves multiplicities and associated mysterious gauge invariance of arborescent calculus. In this paper we make the very first step – reformulate in this form the previously known formulas for the simplest non-rectangular representations and demonstrate their drastic simplification after this reformulation.
Spectacular success [1, 2] of the lasting program [3]-[9] to calculate colored knot polynomials [10] for antiparallel double braids (double twist knots) and Racah matrices [11] in all rectangular representations from the evolution properties [12]-[16] of their differential expansions [17, 13, 14, 18], opens a way to attack the main problem of arborescent calculus [19, 20]: understanding of non-rectangular representations. The main difference from rectangular case is that multiplicities occur in the product of representations, and this makes the notion of Racah matrices ambiguous. In the language of [20] this is described as the new gauge invariance and one of the problems is to define gauge-invariant arborescent vertices. However, before that there is a problem to calculate the Racah matrices and , which enter the definition of ”fingers” and ”propagators”, connected by these vertices. These problems, are not fully unrelated, because and in non-rectangular case are not gauge invariant – still one can ask what they are in a particular gauge. As suggested in [4], the key to evaluation of is differential expansion (DE) for twist knots [14] – which, once known, straightforwardly produces for rectangular , because of spectacular (and still unexplained!) factorization property of the DE coefficients for double braids. are then easily extractable as a diagonalizing matrix for – it is enough to solve a system of linear equations. However, for non-rectangular the situation is worse: differential expansion for double braids includes not itself, but some gauge-invariant combination of its matrix elements, and also the linear system for is degenerate and again provides only the information about gauge-invariant quantities. The problem therefore is to extract at this stages exactly the combinations, needed for arborescent calculus – and we do not yet know what they are. In other words, for non-rectangular we face a whole complex of related problems, which is partly surveyed in [20], [7] and, especially, [8]. Whatever the resolution will be, the first step is going to be the differential expansion for twist knots – and it is still not fully known for non-rectangular . It is the goal of the present paper to suggest a mixture of the results of [7] and [1, 2] to advance in this direction.
We avoid repeating the whole story and refer to [2] for the latest summary and references. The crucial facts are the observation of [4] for the antiparallel double braid in Fig.1:
[TABLE]
and the second observation of [1, 2], that for rectangular :
[TABLE]
where is a universal triangular ”embedding” matrix with . In this paper we consider the possibility for (5) to hold also for non-rectangular . We do not discuss what are the -independent differential combinations , which is also a highly non-trivial story in this case, see [7] and a number of preceding papers, cited therein. This -story actually belongs to the theory of a single figure-eight knot, and is well separated from the problem of -dependence, which we address now – though both are equally relevant for the next step towards Racah matrices.
Representations and in (4) are composite, see Fig.2. For rectangular representations only very special diagonal composites contribute to – and they are in one-to-one correspondence with the Young sub-diagrams of , and ”embedding” for diagonal composites is understood as embedding of the corresponding :
[TABLE]
The entries of the matrix in (5) are expressed through the skew Schur functions:
[TABLE]
where stands for transposition of the Young diagram, and are the eigenvalues of -matrix in the channel
[TABLE]
best expressed through the hook parameters of :
[TABLE]
Index means that Schur functions are evaluated at the ”unit” locus in the space of time-variables,
[TABLE]
At this is equivalent to putting , and there is even a a special notation for the result: . The value of skew Schur at the unit locus at can be also expressed through shifted Schur functions [21]
[TABLE]
evaluated at
[TABLE]
where denotes the lengths of lines of the Young diagram . According to this definition, the shifted vanishes at the -locus (12) whenever is not a sub-diagram of . Since shifted Macdonald functions can be defined in just the same way as Schurs [22], eq.(11) can be immediately used to define a ”refined” matrix and thus, through (5), the hyper-polynomials (by definition of [12] they are result of a clever substitution of Schur by Macdonald functions in HOMPLY-PT polynomials, see also [23, 18] and [24]). It was demonstrated in [1] that they are indeed positive Laurent polynomials, presumably in all rectangular representations and for all double twist knots.
For non-rectangular expressions for and become somewhat complicated, and one can expect that expression (5) of through an auxiliary matrix once again leads to drastic simplification. As we will see, this is indeed the case. Note that of the three properties
[TABLE]
for the figure-eight knot, unknot and trefoil respectively, the first one is automatic in (5), the second one requires that sum of the entries of is zero along each line, , and the third one then says that is a monomial .
In this paper we consider the simplest case of , for which the answers are already known from [7]. In this case in addition to the diagrams with , i.e. , there are additional composite pairs with the same dimensions and eigenvalues
[TABLE]
each contributing once to the differential expansion. These contribute additional lines to the matrix , which thus becomes of the size . Remarkably, remains triangular, though a notion of embedding for generic composites gets somewhat more subtle than (8). The first lines remain as they were in (7). The new entries in the new lines with are:
.
[TABLE]
In particular,
[TABLE]
As we see, these entries essentially depend on , and are therefore sensitive to characters (or something else) beyond the unit locus (10).
In the simplest case of the matrix is
[TABLE]
The new one – revealed by consideration of the non-rectangular – is the last line.
For the line remains the same – this is the universality property of – and there is one more new, as compared to (7), line for :
\begin{array}[]{c||ccccccccc}&\emptyset&[1]&[1,1]&[2]&[2,1]&[3]&[3,1]&\tilde{X}_{2}&\tilde{X}_{3}\\ &&&&&&&&&\\ \hline\cr&&&&&&&&&\\ \tilde{X}_{3}&q^{4}A^{8}&-[4]q^{5}A^{8}&-\frac{q^{2}(A^{2}-q^{6})A^{6}}{q^{4}-1}&\frac{q^{4}\big{(}A^{2}(q^{10}+q^{8}-1)-1\big{)}A^{6}}{q^{4}-1}&\frac{q^{4}(A^{2}-q^{2})(A^{2}-q^{6})A^{6}}{(q^{6}-1)(A^{2}-1)}&-\frac{q^{6}(A^{2}q^{10}-1)A^{6}}{q^{6}-1}&0&-\frac{q^{4}(A^{2}q^{2}-1)A^{6}}{A^{2}-1}&q^{6}A^{6}\end{array}
One can compare with the original formulas for in [7] to appreciate the simplification.
To make the story about complete, we need also explicit formula for the -factors. They are made from the differentials , for example for
[TABLE]
We see that one of the -factors is not fully factorized – this is the one, associated with the diagram which has non-trivial multiplicity. Since multiplicity is two, it is naturally decomposed into sum of two factorized items. For a full understanding of how this works we need a more sophisticated theory, involving the analogue of -matrices from [2] for non-rectangular and reduction from the full-fledged matrix representation to the one. This is a difficult and still not fully-developed subject beyond the scope of the present paper.
Known at this stage are all the -factors in the case of , see [7]. They are not-quite-factorized for all single-line with, which enter with multiplicities two:
[TABLE]
and are factorized for the other two series:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In fact, (34) is also factorized (the first term in the second line vanishes) at .
For generic we should consider all composite with all pairs of the same-size sub-diagrams of : , . For example, for there will be three non-diagonal () pairs: the two already familiar , and a new one: . For the psychologically important we encounter the first triple , giving rise to three pairs , and . Formulas (16) should be straightforwardly extendable to this general case – but it remains to be done, and it remains to be seen if triangular shape of persists. Hopefully straightforward are also their Macdonald deformations – and it is interesting to see if this leads to hyper-polynomials, but not fully positive – as currently suspected for non-rectangular representations.
Acknowledgements
My work is partly supported by the grant of the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics BASIS, by RFBR grant 19-02-00815 and by the joint grants 17-51-50051-YaF, 18-51-05015-Arm, 18-51-45010-Ind, RFBR-GFEN 19-51-53014.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M.Kameyama, S.Nawata, R.Tao, H.D.Zhang, ar Xiv:1902.02275
- 2[2] A.Morozov, Phys.Lett. B 793 (2019) 116-125, ar Xiv:1902.04140
- 3[3] A.Morozov, Nucl.Phys. B 911 (2016) 582-605, ar Xiv:1605.09728
- 4[4] A.Morozov, JHEP 1609 (2016) 135, ar Xiv:1606.06015 v 8
- 5[5] Ya.Kononov and A.Morozov, Theor.Math.Phys. 193 (2017) 1630-1646, ar Xiv:1609.00143
- 6[6] Ya.Kononov and A.Morozov, Mod.Phys.Lett. A Vol. 31, No. 38 (2016) 1650223, ar Xiv:1610.04778
- 7[7] A.Morozov, Mod.Phys.Lett. A 33 No. 12 (2018) 1850062, ar Xiv:1612.00422
- 8[8] A.Morozov, Phys.Lett. B 766 (2017) 291-300, ar Xiv:1701.00359
