Linear Degeneracy of the First-Order Generalized-Harmonic Einstein System
Li-Wei Ji, Lee Lindblom, Zhoujian Cao

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the conditions for linear degeneracy in the first-order generalized-harmonic Einstein system, which is important for understanding the system's behavior in vacuum spacetime evolution.
Contribution
It identifies specific conditions that ensure the first-order generalized-harmonic Einstein system is linearly degenerate, enhancing theoretical understanding.
Findings
Conditions for linear degeneracy are explicitly characterized.
Clarification improves stability analysis of Einstein evolution systems.
Provides theoretical foundation for future numerical relativity work.
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to clarify the conditions under which the first-order generalize-harmonic representation of the vacuum Einstein evolution system is linearly degenerate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Linear Degeneracy of the First-Order Generalized-Harmonic
Einstein System
Li-Wei Ji1, Lee Lindblom2, Zhoujian Cao3
1Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
2Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
3 Institute of Applied Mathematics and the Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering Computing, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to clarify the conditions under which the first-order generalize-harmonic representation of the vacuum Einstein evolution system is linearly degenerate.
type:
Note
††: Class. Quantum Grav.
The formation of coordinate shocks is one of the important problems that must be overcome by any representation of Einstein’s equation that is to be used successfully in numerical relativity. Poor dynamical gauge conditions can and will lead to the formation of shocks (and consequently coordinate singularities) from the evolution of smooth initial data [1]. Linear degeneracy is a mathematical condition that prevents the formation of shocks in a large class of hyperbolic evolution systems [2, 3, 4]. The purpose of this note is to clarify the conditions under which the first-order generalized-harmonic representation of the vacuum Einstein system [5] is linearly degenerate. The original paper on this system claimed, without presenting a proof, that the system was linearly degenerate if a certain constant satisfied the condition [5]. Here we demonstrate that this claim is correct. While the proof is fairly straightforward, some readers of the original paper have questioned whether that condition is correct [6]. Consequently it seems appropriate to provide a more complete description of the derivation that demonstrates this fact.
The first-order generalized-harmonic representation of Einstein’s vacuum equation [5] can be written abstractly as a quasi-linear system,
[TABLE]
where is the collection of dynamical fields: the spacetime metric, and its time and space derivatives and . The quantities and depend on but not its derivatives. We use the notation for vectors, and for co-vectors on the space of dynamical fields. The principal parts of the first-order generalized-harmonic vacuum Einstein system, , are given explicitly by
[TABLE]
where and are the lapse and shift associated with the standard representation of the metric , and where and are constants.111The constants and multiplied by certain constraints of the vacuum Einstein system were added to the equations in Ref. [5]. The resulting system is symmetric hyperbolic for any values of these constants. As shown here, the constant effects the linear degeneracy of the system. The constant effects the growth of small constraint violations, and must be positive, , for numerical stability. The characteristic matrix for this system can be written as
[TABLE]
for waves propagating through a surface (chosen arbitrarily) with spacelike unit normal co-vector . Summation over repeated indices, e.g., , , and , is implied. Linear degeneracy is a condition on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this characteristic matrix.
The left and right eigenvectors, and respectively, of the characteristic matrix are defined by:
[TABLE]
The left eigenvectors of the first-order generalized-harmonic vacuum Einstein system are given by
[TABLE]
while the right eigenvectors are given by
[TABLE]
The first-order vacuum Einstein system is symmetric hyperbolic, since there exists a symmetric positive definite tensor on the space of fields that satisfies the condition [5]. This implies that the left and right eigenvectors are related (up to normalizations) by , and the associated eigenvalues must be equal . These eigenvalues for the vacuum Einstein system are given by
[TABLE]
The quasi-linear hyperbolic evolution system, Eq. (1), is said to be linearly degenerate if all the eigenvalues of the characteristic matrix are constant along the corresponding right eigenvectors of that system, so that
[TABLE]
for each [2]. The eigenvalues of the Einstein system, Eqs. (14)–(16), depend only on the lapse, , the shift, , and the unit normal vector . These eigenvalues therefore depend only on the metric, , and not on its derivatives, or . Thus the derivatives of the eigenvalues in the direction of the right eigenvectors are given by,
[TABLE]
These derivatives vanish, and consequently the system is linearly degenerate, if and only if .
The original paper on the first-order generalized-harmonic vacuum Einstein system did not explicitly give expressions for either the left or the right eigenvectors [5]. The characteristic fields, , of this system were given, however, and from those the left eigenvectors could easily be inferred. The reported confusion about the correct conditions for linear degeneracy for this system may have arisen from an examination of the quantities , which do not vanish unless and [6]. These quantities involving the left eigenvectors (which are co-vectors, not true vectors) are non-covariant and are therefore meaningless from a fundamental mathematical viewpoint. In any case they are irrelevant because the formal definition of linear degeneracy given by Lax in Ref. [2] specifies that the right eigenvectors are to be used in Eq. (17), and this equation is covariant.
L.L. thanks the Morningside Center for Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China for their hospitality during a visit in which a portion of this research was performed. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants PHY-1604244 and DMS-1620366 to the University of California at San Diego.
References
- [1]
Alcubierre M 1997 Phys. Rev. D 55 5981–5991
- [2]
Lax P D 1973 Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)
- [3]
Liu T P 1979 J. Diff. Equations 33 92–111
- [4]
Li T, Zhou Y and Kong D 1994 Comm. Partial Diff. Equations 19 1263–1317
- [5]
Lindblom L, Scheel M A, Kidder L E, Owen R and Rinne O 2006 Class. Quant. Grav. 23 S447–S462
- [6]
Cao Z, Fu P, Ji L W and Xia Y 2018 International Journal of Modern Physics D 28 1950014
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Alcubierre M 1997 Phys. Rev. D 55 5981–5991
- 2[2] Lax P D 1973 Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)
- 3[3] Liu T P 1979 J. Diff. Equations 33 92–111
- 4[4] Li T, Zhou Y and Kong D 1994 Comm. Partial Diff. Equations 19 1263–1317
- 5[5] Lindblom L, Scheel M A, Kidder L E, Owen R and Rinne O 2006 Class. Quant. Grav. 23 S 447–S 462
- 6[6] Cao Z, Fu P, Ji L W and Xia Y 2018 International Journal of Modern Physics D 28 1950014
