Opial's inequality in $q$-Calculus revisited
Tatjana Z. Mirkovic, Slobodan B. Trickovic, Miomir S. Stankovic

TL;DR
This paper revisits Opial's inequality within q-calculus, providing corrected proofs using elementary inequalities and the Gauchman q-restricted integral, offering a more straightforward approach.
Contribution
It offers a fundamentally corrected and simplified proof of Opial's inequality in q-calculus, improving upon previous methods.
Findings
Corrected proofs of Opial's inequality in q-calculus
Introduction of a simple proof method based on elementary inequalities
Application of Gauchman q-restricted integral
Abstract
We have fundamentally corrected the proofs of the theorems from our paper [9] by giving an entirely different approach, using quite a simple method based on applications of some elementary inequalities, well-known H\"older's inequality, and the Gauchman -restricted integral.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuzzy Systems and Optimization · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
Comments on the article Opial inequality in -Calculus
Tatjana Z. Mirkovic1, Slobodan B. Tričković2, Miomir S. Stanković3
1College of Applied Professional Studies, Filipa Filipovića 20, 17000 Vranje, Serbia,
2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Civil Engineering,
Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia,
3Mathematical Institute of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts,
Kneza Mihaila 36, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
We give corrections concerned with the proofs of the theorems from the paper [9], where, by using quite a elementary method based on some simple observations and applications of some fundamental inequalities, a new general Opial type integral inequality in -Calculus was established, Opial inequalities in -Calculus involving two functions and their first order derivatives were investigated, and several particular cases were discussed.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
In the recent paper [9] a generalization of the Opial integral inequality
[TABLE]
in -calculus was given. Here we eliminate some inaccuracies by simplifying and modifying the proofs of the theorems.
First of all, we present necessary definitions and facts from the -calculus, where is a real number satisfying , and -natural number is defined by
[TABLE]
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a function defined on an interval , so that for all . For , we define the -derivative as
[TABLE]
In the paper [8], Jackson defined -integral, which in the -calculus bears his name.
Definition 1.2**.**
The -integral on is
[TABLE]
On this basis, in the same paper, Jackson defined an integral on
[TABLE]
For a positive integer and , using the left-hand side integral of (3), in the paper [7], Gauchman introduced the -restricted integral
[TABLE]
Definition 1.3**.**
The real function defined on is called -increasing (-decreasing)* on if () for .*
It is easy to see that if the function is increasing (decreasing), then it is -increasing (-decreasing) too.
2 Results and discussions
Our main results are contained in three theorems.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be -decreasing function on with . Then, for any , there holds
[TABLE]
Proof.
Using Definition 1.1 and (4), we have
[TABLE]
whence, taking into account that is -decreasing, we have
[TABLE]
In view of , we obtain
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
The right-hand side of this inequality we can write in the form of
[TABLE]
After rewriting , and applying Hölder’s inequality to the last sum, we have
[TABLE]
After raising both sides to the power , we find
[TABLE]
Multiplying this inequality by , and relying on the formula for the sum of the first terms of the geometric series, we arrive at the inequality
[TABLE]
Considering that , taking into account (6), we have proved the inequality
[TABLE]
Referring to (4), there holds
[TABLE]
whereby we prove the theorem. ∎
Remark 2.2**.**
In particular, by taking , the inequality (5) in Theorem 2.1 reduces to the following Opial’s inequality in -Calculus.
[TABLE]
The following theorems are concerned with -monotonic functions.
Theorem 2.3**.**
If and are -decreasing functions on satisfying and , then there holds the inequality
[TABLE]
Proof.
Replacing (2) in the integral
[TABLE]
we obtain
[TABLE]
whence, using Gauchman -restricted integral, we have
[TABLE]
Using the elementary inequality , and considering that
[TABLE]
we find
[TABLE]
Applying (7) for , knowing that and are -decreasing, we obtain
[TABLE]
as well as
[TABLE]
Since , making use of (4), we have
[TABLE]
whereby (8) is proved. ∎
Theorem 2.4**.**
If and are -decreasing functions on satisfying , then there holds the inequality
[TABLE]
Proof.
First, we apply (4) to the left-hand side of (9), and have
[TABLE]
For real numbers and , we rely on the elementary inequality
[TABLE]
After setting , we find
[TABLE]
Considering that and are -decreasing functions, so and , the last inequality becomes
[TABLE]
However, there holds
[TABLE]
so that we have
[TABLE]
Here we follow the same procedure as in the proof of Theorem 2.1. So, after rewriting , and applying Hölder’s inequality to both sums on the right side of the last inequality, for the first sum we have
[TABLE]
and for the second as well
[TABLE]
We multiply both inequalities by , then raise them to the power . Thus, we obtain
[TABLE]
and similarly
[TABLE]
so that, because , from (10) there follows (9), whereby we complete the proof. ∎
Remark 2.5**.**
In the special case when and , the inequality established in (9) reduces to the -Wirtinger-type inequality
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Opial, Sur une inegalite, Ann. Polon. Math., New York, 8, 29 - 32, (1960)
- 2[2] Agarwal, Lakshmikantham, Uniqueness and nonuniqueness criteria for ordinary differential equations, 1993.
- 3[3] Agarwal, Pang, Opial inequalities with applications in differential and difference equations, Dordrecht:Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1995)
- 4[4] Anastassiou, J. Appl. Func.l Anal, Vol. 9 Issue 1/2 (2014) 230–238.
- 5[5] Bainov, Simeonov, Integral inequalities and applications, Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1992)
- 6[6] Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl 1, 73-85, 2015.
- 7[7] Gauchman, Integral inequalities in q 𝑞 q -calculus, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 47, 281–300 (2004)
- 8[8] Jackson, On a q 𝑞 q -Definite Itegrals. Quarterly Journal of Pure and Apllied Mathematics 41 (1910) 193 - 203.
