Comment on "Monopole production via photon fusion and Drell-Yan processes: MadGraph implementation and perturbativity via velocity-dependent coupling and magnetic moment as novel features"
Ricardo Heras

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent study on monopole production, clarifying misconceptions about the magnetic field configuration and quantisation conditions, and emphasizing the importance of correct field identification.
Contribution
The paper refutes a previous claim by demonstrating that the modified Wu-Yang configuration leads to multiple quantisation conditions, correcting the understanding of monopole magnetic fields.
Findings
Incorrect identification of magnetic fields in the previous study
Modified Wu-Yang configuration results in infinite quantisation conditions
Clarification of magnetic field and monopole relationships
Abstract
In a recent study on monopole production [Eur. Phys. J. C (2018) 78: 966], Baines et al added the potential of a magnetic dipole to the Wu-Yang potentials for the Dirac monopole and claimed that this modified Wu-Yang configuration does not affect the Dirac quantisation condition. In this comment, we argue that their claim is incorrect by showing that their modified Wu-Yang configuration leads to an infinite number of quantisation conditions. In their study, they also incorrectly identified the magnetic field of the monopole with the magnetic field of the Dirac string and its attached magnetic monopole.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
