Improved Fault-Tolerant Quantum Simulation of Condensed-Phase Correlated Electrons via Trotterization
Ian D. Kivlichan, Craig Gidney, Dominic W. Berry, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod, McClean, Wei Sun, Zhang Jiang, Nicholas Rubin, Austin Fowler, Al\'an, Aspuru-Guzik, Hartmut Neven, Ryan Babbush

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that optimized Trotter-Suzuki product formulas can enhance fault-tolerant quantum simulations of condensed-phase correlated electrons, achieving efficient, high-precision results with manageable qubit and gate complexities.
Contribution
It introduces improved Trotterization techniques for quantum simulation, outperforming previous methods like linear combinations of unitaries in certain condensed-phase models.
Findings
Low-order Trotter methods perform well with phase estimation.
Simulations of models with up to 10^5 fermionic modes are feasible.
Split-operator techniques reduce Trotter error compared to alternatives.
Abstract
Recent work has deployed linear combinations of unitaries techniques to reduce the cost of fault-tolerant quantum simulations of correlated electron models. Here, we show that one can sometimes improve upon those results with optimized implementations of Trotter-Suzuki-based product formulas. We show that low-order Trotter methods perform surprisingly well when used with phase estimation to compute relative precision quantities (e.g. energies per unit cell), as is often the goal for condensed-phase systems. In this context, simulations of the Hubbard and plane-wave electronic structure models with fermionic modes can be performed with roughly and T complexities. We perform numerics revealing tradeoffs between the error and gate complexity of a Trotter step; e.g., we show that split-operator techniques have less Trotter error than popular alternatives. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
