Measurement of the 235U(n,f) cross section relative to the 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,alpha) standards from thermal to 170 keV neutron energy range at n_TOF
S. Amaducci, L. Cosentino, M. Barbagallo, N. Colonna, A. Mengoni, C., Massimi, S. Lo Meo, P. Finocchiaro, O. Aberle, J. Andrzejewski, L. Audouin,, M. Bacak, J. Balibrea, F. Be\v{c}v\'a\v{r}, E. Berthoumieux, J. Billowes, D., Bosnar, A. Brown, M. Caama\~no, F. Calvi\~no

TL;DR
This study measured the 235U(n,f) cross section relative to standard reactions across a broad neutron energy range at n_TOF, revealing overestimations in recent evaluations and confirming resonance structures, thus improving data accuracy.
Contribution
The paper provides high-resolution measurements of the 235U(n,f) cross section relative to standards, highlighting discrepancies in recent evaluations and confirming resonance features in the keV range.
Findings
Overestimation of cross section in 9-18 keV range in recent data
Confirmation of resonance-like structures in the keV neutron energy region
Potential reduction of uncertainty in 1-100 keV neutron energy measurements
Abstract
The 235U(n,f) cross section was measured in a wide energy range at n_TOF relative to 6Li(n,t) and 10B(n,alpha), with high resolution and in a wide energy range, with a setup based on a stack of six samples and six silicon detectors placed in the neutron beam. This allowed us to make a direct comparison of the reaction yields under the same experimental conditions, and taking into account the forward/backward emission asymmetry. A hint of an anomaly in the 10{\div}30 keV neutron energy range had been previously observed in other experiments, indicating a cross section systematically lower by several percent relative to major evaluations. The present results indicate that the evaluated cross section in the 9{\div}18 keV neutron energy range is indeed overestimated, both in the recent updates of ENDF/B-VIII.0 and of the IAEA reference data. Furthermore, these new high-resolution data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
