A tutorial on group effective connectivity analysis, part 2: second level analysis with PEB
Peter Zeidman, Amirhossein Jafarian, Mohamed L. Seghier, Vladimir, Litvak, Hayriye Cagnan, Cathy J. Price, Karl J. Friston

TL;DR
This paper explains how to use hierarchical Bayesian models combining DCM and PEB to analyze inter-subject variability in neural effective connectivity, with practical guidance and example data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed tutorial on applying second-level PEB analysis for group effective connectivity, integrating hierarchical modeling with DCM and GLM.
Findings
Demonstrates how to model inter-subject variability in effective connectivity
Shows how group-level priors improve subject-level parameter estimation
Provides step-by-step instructions with example data for reproducibility
Abstract
This tutorial provides a worked example of using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and Parametric Empirical Bayes (PEB) to characterise inter-subject variability in neural circuitry (effective connectivity). This involves specifying a hierarchical model with two or more levels. At the first level, state space models (DCMs) are used to infer the effective connectivity that best explains a subject's neuroimaging timeseries (e.g. fMRI, MEG, EEG). Subject-specific connectivity parameters are then taken to the group level, where they are modelled using a General Linear Model (GLM) that partitions between-subject variability into designed effects and additive random effects. The ensuing (Bayesian) hierarchical model conveys both the estimated connection strengths and their uncertainty (i.e., posterior covariance) from the subject to the group level; enabling hypotheses to be tested about the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
