# Characteristic classes of involutions in nonsolvable groups

**Authors:** Yotam Fine

arXiv: 1902.10233 · 2019-09-20

## TL;DR

This paper investigates conditions under which a finite group is solvable based on automorphism group actions on involutions, and constructs a counterexample showing certain assumptions are necessary for solvability.

## Contribution

It proves that specific automorphism conditions imply group solvability and provides a counterexample demonstrating the necessity of these conditions.

## Key findings

- Automorphism conditions imply group solvability.
- Constructed a nonsolvable group with no characteristic conjugacy class of nontrivial cyclic subgroups.
- Answered a longstanding problem in group theory from the Kourovka Notebook.

## Abstract

Let $G,D_{0},D_{1}$ be finite groups such that $D_{0}\trianglelefteq D_{1}$ are groups of automorphisms of $G$ that contain the inner automorphisms of $G$. Assume that $D_{1}/D_{0}$ has a normal $2$-complement and that $D_{1}$ acts fixed-point-freely on the set of $D_{0}$-conjugacy classes of involutions of $G$ (i.e., $C_{D_{1}}(a)D_{0}<D_{1}$ for every involution $a\in G$). We prove that $G$ is solvable. We also construct a nonsolvable finite group that possesses no characteristic conjugacy class of nontrivial cyclic subgroups. This shows that an assumption on the structure of $D_{1}/D_{0}$ above must be made in order to guarantee the solvability of $G$ and also yields a negative answer to Problem 3.51 in the Kourovka Notebook, posed by A. I. Saksonov in 1969.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.10233/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.10233/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.10233