# Ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays: Anomalies, QCD, and LHC data

**Authors:** David d'Enterria

arXiv: 1902.09505 · 2019-06-12

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how recent LHC data has improved models of hadronic interactions relevant to ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, but persistent anomalies suggest possible new physics or the need for further model refinement.

## Contribution

It provides an updated comparison of Monte Carlo models with LHC data, highlighting remaining discrepancies and potential avenues for understanding cosmic ray composition and new physics.

## Key findings

- Models now better match LHC data after retuning.
- Significant muon number discrepancies remain.
- Potential new physics or model improvements needed.

## Abstract

Measurements of proton and nuclear collisions at the Large Hadron Collider at nucleon-nucleon c.m. energies up to $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 13 TeV, have improved our understanding of hadronic interactions at the highest energies reached in collisions of cosmic rays with nuclei in the earth atmosphere, up to $\sqrt{s_{NN}}\approx 450$ TeV. The Monte Carlo event generators (EPOS, QGSJET, and SIBYLL) commonly used to describe the air showers generated by ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR, with $E_{CR}\approx 10^{17}$--$10^{20}$ eV) feature now, after parameter retuning based on LHC Run-I data, more consistent predictions on the nature of the cosmic rays at the tail of the measured spectrum. However, anomalies persist in the data that cannot be accommodated by the models. Among others, the total number of muons (as well as their maximum production depth) remains significantly underestimated (overestimated) by all models. Comparisons of EPOS, QGSJET, and SIBYLL predictions to the latest LHC data, and to collider MC generators such as PYTHIA, indicate that improved description of hard multiple minijet production and nuclear effects may help reduce part of the data--model discrepancies, shed light on the UHECR composition approaching the observed $E_{CR}\approx 10^{20}$ eV cutoff, and uncover any potential new physics responsible of the observed anomalies.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09505/full.md

## Figures

15 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09505/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09505/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09505