Identical quantum particles as distinguishable objects
Dennis Dieks, Andrea Lubberdink

TL;DR
This paper challenges the standard view of indistinguishable quantum particles, proposing an alternative conception where quantum particles are emergent and distinguishable like classical particles, addressing conceptual issues in quantum theory.
Contribution
It introduces a non-factorist approach to quantum particles, arguing they are emergent and distinguishable, aligning quantum and classical particle concepts.
Findings
Quantum particles are not fundamental but emergent.
Distinguishability of particles applies in applicable situations.
Addresses conceptual problems with factorism and indistinguishability.
Abstract
According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. Classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by physical characteristics. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the standard view is that particles of the same kind ("identical particles") are in all circumstances indistinguishable from each other. This indistinguishability doctrine is motivated by the (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the assumption (``factorism'') that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space in the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particles system. Although the factorist assumption is standard in the literature, it is conceptually problematic. Particle indistinguishability is incompatible with the everyday meaning of ``particle'', and also with how this term is used both in classical physics and in the experimental practice of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
