# On the origin of the $Y(4260)$

**Authors:** Susana Coito, Francesco Giacosa

arXiv: 1902.09268 · 2020-11-17

## TL;DR

This paper proposes that the $Y(4260)$ is not a separate resonance but a manifestation of the $	ext{psi}(4160)$, arising from loop-driven decay processes enhanced by proximity to a decay channel threshold.

## Contribution

The study introduces an unitarized effective Lagrangian approach showing the $Y(4260)$ as a variation of the $	ext{psi}(4160)$, challenging the notion of it being an independent resonance.

## Key findings

- $Y(4260)$ is linked to $	ext{psi}(4160)$ via decay loops.
- The proximity to the $D_s^*ar{D}_s^*$ threshold enhances the decay.
- $Y(4260)$ is not observed in OZI-allowed channels.

## Abstract

We study the relation between the $\psi(4160)$ and the $Y(4260)$ within an unitarized effective Lagrangian approach. The $Y(4260)$ arises as a manifestation of the $\psi(4160)$, when a loop-driven decay of the type $\psi(4160)\to D_s^*\bar{D}_s^*\to J/\psi f_0(980)$ is enhanced by the proximity of the pole, corresponding to the $\psi(4160)$, to the \emph{almost} closed $D_s^*\bar{D}_s^*$ decay channel. Other $f_0$ resonances that may add a non-negligible contribution, by the same mechanism, are not included for simplicity, but they are not expected to change the main conclusion. Within this picture, the $Y(4260)$ is not, therefore, an independent resonance, but rather a variation of the $\psi(4160)$, which also explains why it is not seen in OZI-allowed decay channels in the experiment.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09268/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09268/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09268/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.09268