Casimir operators of centrally extended l-conformal Galilei algebra
Anton Galajinsky, Ivan Masterov

TL;DR
This paper derives the complete set of Casimir operators for the centrally extended l-conformal Galilei algebra, providing a simplified and accessible formulation.
Contribution
It presents the first explicit, simple form of all Casimir elements for this algebra, advancing understanding of its structure.
Findings
Complete set of Casimir operators derived
Casimir elements expressed in simple, tractable form
Facilitates further algebraic and physical applications
Abstract
The full set of Casimir elements of the centrally extended l-conformal Galilei algebra is found in simple and tractable form.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
**Casimir operators of centrally extended
–conformal Galilei algebra
**
a Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Lenin Ave. 30, Russia
b Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Lenin Ave. 40, Russia
Emails: [email protected], [email protected]
The full set of Casimir elements of the centrally extended –conformal Galilei algebra is found in simple and tractable form.
PACS numbers: 11.30.-j, 11.25.Hf, 02.20.Sv
Keywords: conformal Galilei algebra, Casimir operators
Recently there has been a burst of activity in studying dynamical realizations of the –conformal Galilei algebra [1]–[12]. It is expected that such systems may prove useful for a deeper understanding of the non–relativistic holography. The term ”–conformal” stems from the fact that both the dimension of the algebra and its structure relations depend on an external parameter , which may take integer or half–integer values [13]. One more free parameter, which characterizes the algebra, is linked to the spatial dimension .
In general, models with involve higher derivative terms. Making no harm to a free theory, such terms typically entail unstable classical dynamics or trouble with ghosts in quantum description as soon as the interaction is present. Currently known second order systems invariant under the –conformal Galilei group include a set of the isotropic oscillators coupled to the external conformal mode [3, 7] and the geodesic equations associated with a specific Ricci–flat metric of the ultrahyperbolic signature [10].
Thus far, attention was mostly drawn to classical models. Potential quantum–mechanical applications pose the question of describing the Casimir operators of the centrally extended –conformal Galilei algebra in simple and tractable form. In a very recent work [14], a quartic Casimir invariant was constructed for the cases of and half–integer , and and integer . Worth mentioning also is the instance of and half–integer analyzed in [6]. The goal of this brief note is to present the full set of the Casimir elements of the centrally extended –conformal Galilei algebra for arbitrary values of and .
Let us choose the basis, in which the structure relations of the algebra read
[TABLE]
Here designate the generators of temporal translations, dilatations, and special conformal transformations, respectively, , , are associated with spatial rotations, and , , , signify vector generators in the algebra. In this notation, and are linked to spatial translations, and Galilei boosts, while higher values of the index correspond to accelerations.
In general, the algebra admits an extension by the central element [15]
[TABLE]
where for half-integer and arbitrary , while , , , for integer and . Keeping the central charge apart, the dimension of the algebra is equal to .
Proceeding to the construction of the Casimir invariants, we first use the previous formula so as to disentangle from . Introducing the operators
[TABLE]
one finds the relations
[TABLE]
which all together imply that the operator
[TABLE]
is a quartic Casimir invariant of the centrally extended –conformal Galilei algebra. In particular, (5) encompasses all the cases previously studied in the literature [6, 14]. When verifying the structure relations (S0.Ex2), the identity
[TABLE]
proves to be helpful.111When computing the Casimir invariants, the instances of , and , are naturally excluded from the sums at hand.
In a similar fashion one can disentangle from by introducing the operators
[TABLE]
which obey
[TABLE]
These allow one to build the Casimir elements associated with the subalgebra. For odd , there are such operators, which are obtained by the consecutive contraction of an even number of with each other (see, e.g., Sect. 5 in [16]). For even , one reveals invariants, which are constructed in a similar fashion, as well as one extra element resulting from the contraction of with the Levi–Civitá totally antisymmetric tensor .
Finally, according to the analysis in [17], the total number of the Casimir elements characterizing a Lie algebra is given by the difference of its dimension and the rank of its commutator table regarded as a numerical matrix. It is straightforward to compute this number for the case at hand and verify that no further invariants ought to be expected. Thus, the centrally extended –conformal Galilei algebra admits Casimir invariants if the dimension is odd and such operators if is even.
Concluding this work, we note that a similar analysis for the case of the vanishing central charge turns out to be surprisingly complex. The invariants constructed above, continue to hold after implementing the limit . Yet, a close inspection of various particular cases shows that, according to the criterion in [17], extra Casimir elements ought to be expected, their number growing rather fast with and increasing. At the moment we lack a clear guiding principle of how to systematically build the missing invariants and hope to report on the progress elsewhere.
**Acknowledgements
**
The work of A.G. was supported by the RFBR grant 18-52-05002 and the Tomsk Polytechnic University competitiveness enhancement program. I.M. acknowledges the support of the RF Ministry of Education and Science under the project No 2.8172.2017/8.9.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Lukierski, P.C. Stichel, W.J. Zakrzewski, Acceleration–extended Galilean symmetries with central charges and their dynamical realizations , Phys. Lett. B 650 (2007) 203, hep-th/0702179.
- 2[2] C. Duval, P.A. Horváthy, Non–relativistic conformal symmetries and Newton–Cartan structures , J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 465206, ar Xiv:0904.0531.
- 3[3] S. Fedoruk, E. Ivanov, J. Lukierski, Galilean conformal mechanics from nonlinear realizations , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 085013, ar Xiv:1101.1658.
- 4[4] C. Duval, P. Horváthy, Conformal Galilei groups, Veronese curves, and Newton–Hooke spacetimes , J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 335203, ar Xiv:1104.1502.
- 5[5] J. Gomis, K. Kamimura, Schrodinger equations for higher order non–relativistic particles and N 𝑁 N –Galilean conformal symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 045023, ar Xiv:1109.3773.
- 6[6] K. Andrzejewski, J. Gonera, P. Maslanka, Nonrelativistic conformal groups and their dynamical realizations , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065009, ar Xiv:1204.5950.
- 7[7] A. Galajinsky, I. Masterov, Dynamical realization of l 𝑙 l –conformal Galilei algebra and oscillators , Nucl. Phys. B 866 (2013) 212, ar Xiv:1208.1403.
- 8[8] K. Andrzejewski, J. Gonera, P. Kosinski, P. Maslanka, On dynamical realizations of l 𝑙 l –conformal Galilei groups , Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 309, ar Xiv:1305.6805.
