# An empiric logic approach to Einstein's version of the double-slit experiment

## TL;DR

This paper uses an empirical logic framework to analyze Einstein's double-slit experiment design, challenging Bohr's complementarity principle by examining the truth values of experimental propositions.

## Contribution

It introduces a logic-based approach to evaluate Einstein's experimental setup, providing a new perspective on wave-particle duality and complementarity.

## Key findings

- Challenging Bohr's principle with logical analysis
- Showing both wave and particle propositions can be true simultaneously
- Proposing a method to refute Einstein's design using truth assignments

## Abstract

As per Einstein's design, particles are introduced into the double-slit experiment through a small hole in a plate which can either move up and down (and its momentum can be measured) or be stopped (and its position can be measured). Suppose one measures the position of the plate and this act verifies the statement that the interference pattern is observed in the experiment. However, if it is possible to think about the outcome that one would have obtained if one had measured plate's momentum instead of its position, then it is possible to consider, together with the aforesaid statement, another statement that each particle passes through either slit of the double-slit screen. Hence, the proposition affirming the wave-like behavior and the proposition affirming the particle-like behavior might be true together, which would imply that Bohr's complementarity principle is incorrect. The analysis of Einstein's design and ways to refute it based on an approach that uses exclusively assignments of the truth values to experimental propositions is presented in this paper.