# Interaction position, time, and energy resolution in organic   scintillator bars with dual-ended readout

**Authors:** Melinda Sweany, Aline Galindo-Tellez, Joshua Brown, Erik Brubaker,, Ryan Dorrill, Andrew Druetzler, Nathaniel Kaneshige, John Learned, Kurtis, Nishimura, Wonseok Bae

arXiv: 1902.07743 · 2019-03-27

## TL;DR

This study evaluates the position, timing, and energy resolution of plastic scintillator bars with dual-ended silicon photomultiplier readout, demonstrating their suitability for neutron scatter cameras with specific resolution requirements.

## Contribution

It provides experimental measurements of resolution capabilities and systematic variability in dual-ended readout scintillator bars for neutron detection applications.

## Key findings

- Achieved ~10 mm position resolution with 5x5x190 mm^3 EJ-204 bars.
- Obtained ~1 ns timing resolution suitable for neutron applications.
- Identified that timing difference is less affected by systematic variations than charge ratio.

## Abstract

We report on the position, timing, and energy resolution of a range of plastic scintillator bars and reflector treatments using dual-ended silicon photomultiplier readout. These measurements are motivated by the upcoming construction of an optically segmented single-volume neutron scatter camera, in which neutron elastic scattering off of hydrogen is used to kinematically reconstruct the source direction and energy of an incoming neutron. For this application, interaction position resolutions of about 10 mm and timing resolutions of about 1 ns are necessary to achieve the desired efficiency for fission-energy neutrons. The results presented here indicate that this is achievable with an array of $5\times5\times190~\mathrm{mm}^3$ bars of EJ-204 scintillator wrapped in Teflon tape, read out with SensL's J-series $6\times6~\mathrm{mm}^2$ silicon photomultipliers. With two independent setups, we also explore the systematic variability of the position resolution, and show that, in general, using the difference in the pulse arrival time at the two ends is less susceptible to systematic variation than using the log ratio of the charge amplitude of the two ends. Finally, we measure a bias in the absolute time of interactions as a function of position along the bar: the measured interaction time for events at the center of the bar is $\sim$100 ps later than interactions near the SiPM.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07743/full.md

## Figures

39 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07743/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07743/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07743