Comment to "Topological insulators and superconductors" by Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1057 (2011)
Stanis{\l}aw Krukowski, Pawe{\l} Kempisty, Pawe{\l} Strak, Konrad, Sakowski

TL;DR
This paper critiques a proposed topological surface state solution, demonstrating that the exponential decay is unphysical due to negative kinetic energy, thus challenging prior assumptions in topological insulator models.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of a specific topological surface state solution, highlighting its physical inconsistency and clarifying the conditions for valid surface states.
Findings
The exponential surface state results from an energy outside the allowed range.
The kinetic energy of the state is negative, indicating an unphysical solution.
The proposed state does not represent a physically correct topological surface state.
Abstract
The paper reports on the solution in the semi-space corresponding to topological surface state. It was shown that the exponential surface state results from selection of the energy outside the allowed energy range. In the result, the kinetic energy of the state is negative proving that the proposed state is not physically correct solution.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological Materials and Phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Quantum many-body systems
