# Low-Latency Deep Clustering For Speech Separation

**Authors:** Shanshan Wang, Gaurav Naithani, Tuomas Virtanen

arXiv: 1902.07033 · 2019-02-20

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a low-latency deep clustering method for speech separation using LSTM networks, short synthesis windows, and a buffer for speaker cluster initialization, enabling real-time separation with minimal delay.

## Contribution

It presents a novel low-latency adaptation of deep clustering for speech separation, replacing bidirectional LSTMs with LSTMs, and utilizing a buffer for speaker cluster estimation.

## Key findings

- LSTM-based approach yields about 1 dB lower SDR than bidirectional LSTM.
- Using an 8 ms synthesis window degrades performance by approximately 2.1 dB.
- Separation is feasible with buffer durations as short as 300 ms.

## Abstract

This paper proposes a low algorithmic latency adaptation of the deep clustering approach to speaker-independent speech separation. It consists of three parts: a) the usage of long-short-term-memory (LSTM) networks instead of their bidirectional variant used in the original work, b) using a short synthesis window (here 8 ms) required for low-latency operation, and, c) using a buffer in the beginning of audio mixture to estimate cluster centres corresponding to constituent speakers which are then utilized to separate speakers within the rest of the signal. The buffer duration would serve as an initialization phase after which the system is capable of operating with 8 ms algorithmic latency. We evaluate our proposed approach on two-speaker mixtures from the Wall Street Journal (WSJ0) corpus. We observe that the use of LSTM yields around one dB lower SDR as compared to the baseline bidirectional LSTM in terms of source to distortion ratio (SDR). Moreover, using an 8 ms synthesis window instead of 32 ms degrades the separation performance by around 2.1 dB as compared to the baseline. Finally, we also report separation performance with different buffer durations noting that separation can be achieved even for buffer duration as low as 300ms.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07033/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07033/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07033/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.07033