# Commodity RGB-D Sensors: Data Acquisition

**Authors:** Michael Zollh\"ofer

arXiv: 1902.06835 · 2019-02-20

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the evolution and technical details of commodity RGB-D sensors, highlighting their types, principles, and practical considerations, which have significantly advanced 3D sensing research and applications.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of modern active RGB-D sensors, including their underlying technologies, noise characteristics, and error types, filling a knowledge gap in accessible range sensing.

## Key findings

- Active sensors based on time-of-flight and structured light are predominant.
- Commodity sensors have enabled widespread 3D reconstruction and tracking applications.
- Different sensing modalities have distinct noise and error profiles.

## Abstract

Over the past ten years we have seen a democratization of range sensing technology. While previously range sensors have been highly expensive and only accessible to a few domain experts, such sensors are nowadays ubiquitous and can even be found in the latest generation of mobile devices, e.g., current smartphones. This democratization of range sensing technology was started with the release of the Microsoft Kinect, and since then many different commodity range sensors followed its lead, such as the Primesense Carmine, Asus Xtion Pro, and the Structure Sensor from Occipital. The availability of cheap range sensing technology led to a big leap in research, especially in the context of more powerful static and dynamic reconstruction techniques, starting from 3D scanning applications, such as KinectFusion, to highly accurate face and body tracking approaches. In this chapter, we have a detailed look into the different types of existing range sensors. We discuss the two fundamental types of commodity range sensing techniques in detail, namely passive and active sensing, and we explore the principles these technologies are based on. Our focus is on modern active commodity range sensors based on time-of-flight and structured light. We conclude by discussing the noise characteristics, working ranges, and types of errors made by the different sensing modalities.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06835/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06835/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06835/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06835