# Orientation of ground-state orbital in CeCoIn$_5$ and CeRhIn$_5$

**Authors:** M. Sundermann, A. Amorese, F. Strigari, B. Leedahl, M. W. Haverkort,, H. Gretarsson, L. H. Tjeng, M. Moretti Sala, H. Yav\c{s}, E. D. Bauer, P. F., S. Rosa, J. D. Thompson, A. Severing

arXiv: 1902.06726 · 2019-06-26

## TL;DR

This study uses advanced x-ray scattering techniques to determine the orientation of the ground-state orbital in heavy fermion compounds CeCoIn$_5$ and CeRhIn$_5$, revealing the specific orbital configuration and hybridization effects.

## Contribution

It provides the first direct experimental determination of the ground-state orbital orientation in CeCoIn$_5$ and CeRhIn$_5$ using NIXS, clarifying the orbital symmetry and hybridization effects.

## Key findings

- The ground state is the $	ext{Γ}_7^-$ doublet with lobes along (110).
- In CeCoIn$_5$, the ground state includes contributions from the first excited state.
- The hybridization affects the orbital composition, reducing the expected $	ext{α}^2$ value.

## Abstract

We present core level non-resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (NIXS) data of the heavy fermion compounds CeCoIn$_5$ and CeRhIn$_5$ measured at the Ce $N_{4,5}$-edges. The higher than dipole transitions in NIXS allow determining the orientation of the $\Gamma_7$ crystal-field ground-state orbital within the unit cell. The crystal-field parameters of the Ce$M$In$_5$ compounds and related substitution phase diagrams have been investigated in great detail in the past; however, whether the ground-state wavefunction is the $\Gamma_7^+$ ($x^2\,-\,y^2$) or $\Gamma_7^-$ ($xy$ orientation) remained undetermined. We show that the $\Gamma_7^-$ doublet with lobes along the (110) direction forms the ground state in CeCoIn$_5$ and CeRhIn$_5$. For CeCoIn$_5$, however, we find also some contribution of the first excited state crystal-field state in the ground state due to the stronger hybridization of 4$f$ and conduction electrons, suggesting a smaller $\alpha^2$ value than originally anticipated from x-ray absorption. A comparison is made to the results of existing density functional theory plus dynamical mean-field theory calculations.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06726/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06726/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06726/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06726