On the Partial Sums and Marcinkiewicz and Fej\'er Means on the One- and Two-dimensional One-parameter Martingale Hardy Spaces
George Tephnadze

TL;DR
This thesis investigates convergence and summability of Walsh-Fourier series in martingale Hardy spaces, providing new estimates, conditions for convergence, and strong convergence results for partial sums and means in one- and two-dimensional cases.
Contribution
It offers novel convergence criteria, divergence estimates, and strong convergence proofs for Walsh-Fourier series in martingale Hardy spaces, extending understanding in one- and two-dimensional settings.
Findings
Estimation of convergence and divergence of Walsh-Fourier partial sums.
Necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence in Hardy spaces.
Strong convergence results for Fejér and Marcinkiewicz means.
Abstract
In this PhD thesis we are dealing with convergence and summability of partial sums, Fej\'er and Marcinkiewicz means with respect to one- and two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces. This thesis is focus to achieve the following main results: To find estimation of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of partial sums of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when . To find necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of modulus of continuity of martingale Hardy spaces, for which subsequences of partial sums of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series convergence in norm, when . To find estimation of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of Fej\'er means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when . To find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research · Holomorphic and Operator Theory · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
George Tephnadze
Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences
Department of Mathematics
On the Partial Sums and Marcinkiewicz and Fejér Means
on the One- and Two-dimensional One-parameter Martingale Hardy Spaces
Georgian PhD Thesis
Tbilisi 2016
Abstract
Unlike the classical theory of Fourier series which deals with decomposition of a function into continuous waves, the Walsh functions are “rectangular waves”. Such waves have already been used frequently in the theory of signal transmission, codic theory, cryptography, filtering, image enhancement and digital signal processing.
The problems we have studied in this PhD thesis are central to Mathematical Analysis. They involve techniques which have been developed a great deal during the last three decades.
In this PhD thesis we are dealing with convergence and summability of partial sums, Fejér and Marcinkiewicz means with respect to one- and two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces.
This thesis is focus to achieve the following main results:
• To find estimation of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of partial sums of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when .
• To find necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of modulus of continuity of martingale Hardy spaces, for which subsequences of partial sums of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series convergence in norm, when .
• To find estimation of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when .
• To find necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of modulus of continuity of martingale Hardy spaces, for which subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in norm, when .
• To prove strong convergence of one-dimensional Fejér means with respect to Walsh system on the martingale Hardy spaces , when .
• To prove strong convergence of diagonal partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when .
• To prove strong convergence of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in norm.
• To find necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of modulus of continuity of Hardy spaces, for which Marcinkiewicz means of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in norm.
Contents
@starttoc
toc
Key words: Walsh group, Walsh system, space, weak- space, modulus of continuity, Walsh-Fourier coefficients, Walsh-Fourier series, partial sums, Lebesgue constants, Fejér means, Marcinkiewicz means, dyadic martingale, the one-dimensional Hardy space, the two-dimensional Hardy space, maximal operator, strong convergence.
Preface
The classical theory of Fourier series deals with decomposition of a function into sinusoidal waves. Unlike these continuous waves the Vilenkin (Walsh) functions are rectangular waves. Such waves have already been used frequently in the theory of signal transmission, multiplexing, filtering, image enhancement, codic theory, digital signal processing and pattern recognition. The development of the theory of Vilenkin-Fourier series has been strongly influenced by the classical theory of trigonometric series. Because of this it is inevitable to compare results of Vilenkin series to those on trigonometric series. There are many similarities between these theories, but there exist differences also. Much of these can be explained by modern abstract harmonic analysis, which studies orthonormal systems from the point of view of the structure of a topological group.
The problems studied in this PhD thesis are very important in Mathematical Analysis and its applications. In particular, we consider convergence and summability of partial sums, Fejér and Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the one- and two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces. According to the problems considered in this PhD thesis, widely are used methods of real analysis combined with methods of abstract and non-linear harmonic analysis together with theory of approximation. Other research methods include theory of function spaces. They involve techniques which have been developed a great deal during the last three decades.
This PhD thesis consists the following chapters:
• Preliminaries
• Partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
• Fejér means means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
• Convergence and summability of partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In Chapter 1 we first present some classical results and well-known facts, which are very important in the theory of Fourier analysis and is also very crucial for the further investigation of problems considered in this thesis. Moreover, there are presented results which are proved in the next chapters of this thesis and is emphasized the actuality of them, there is also shown some connections with known results.
In Chapter 2 we first define Walsh group and system, which are important to develop theory of harmonic analysis on locally compact Abelian groups. We consider some expressions and estimations of Lebesgue constants and Dirichlet kernels, give basic definitions and notation of the theory of martingale Hardy spaces and fundamental theorems which are very important to prove main results of this thesis. We also construct martingales which we use to prove sharpness of our positive results. Next, we find rate of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces for . Finally, we apply these results to find necessary and sufficient conditions for the modulus of continuity which provide norm convergence of subsequences of the partial sums in the martingale Hardy spaces, for .
In Chapter 3 we investigate Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series. First, we consider some expressions and estimations of Fejér kernels and find rate of convergence and divergence of the subsequences of Fejér means in the martingale Hardy spaces for . After that, we apply these results to find necessary and sufficient conditions for the modulus of continuity, which provide convergence of subsequences of Fejér means in the martingale Hardy spaces. Finally, we prove some new strong convergence theorems of Fejér means, for . We also prove sharpness of all our main results in this Chapter.
In Chapter 4 we investigate basic definitions and notation of partial sums and Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series. First, we consider some expressions and estimations of Marcinkiewicz kernels, give basic definitions and notation of the theory of the two-dimensional martingale Hardy spaces and fundamental theorems which are very important to prove main results of this thesis. Next, we present and prove strong convergence results of diagonal partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces for . Moreover, we consider strong convergence results of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series for and find necessary and sufficient conditions for the modulus of continuity, which provide convergence in norm of Marcinkiewicz means.
This PhD thesis is written as a monograph based on the following publications:
[1] G. Tephnadze, Strong convergence of two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series, Ukr. Math. J., 65, (6), (2013), 822-834.
[2] G. Tephnadze, Strong convergence theorems of Walsh-Fejér means, Acta Math. Hung., 142 (1) (2014), 244–259.
[3] K. Nagy and G. Tephnadze, Approximation by Walsh-Marcinkiewicz means on the Hardy space , Kyoto J. Math., 54 (3), (2014), 641-652.
[4] G. Tephnadze, On the partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series, Colloquium Mathematicum, 141, 2 (2015), 227-242.
[5] G. Tephnadze, On the convergence of Fejér means of Walsh-Fourier series in the space , J. Contemp. Math. Anal., 51, 2 (2016), 51-63.
[6] K. Nagy and G. Tephnadze, Strong convergence theorem for Walsh-Marcin- kiewicz means, Math. Inequal. Appl., 19, 1 (2016), 185–195.
1 Preliminaries
It is well-known that (for details see e.g. [30] and [47]) for every there exists an absolute constant , depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, Watari [76] (see also Gosselin [31] and Young [85]) proved that there exists an absolute constant such that, for
[TABLE]
On the other hand, it is also well-known that (for details see e.g. [1] and [47]) Walsh system is not Schauder basis in space. Moreover, there exists function , such that partial sums with respect to Walsh system are not uniforml5y bounded in .
By applying Lebesgue constants
[TABLE]
we easily obtain that (for details see e.g. [2] and [47]) subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system converge to in norm if and only if
[TABLE]
Since -th Lebesgue constant with respect to Walsh system, where
[TABLE]
can be estimated by variation of natural number
[TABLE]
and it is also well known that (for details see e.g. [12] and [47]) the following two-sided estimate is true
[TABLE]
to obtain convergence of subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system of in -norm. Condition (1.1) can be replaced by
[TABLE]
It follows that (for details see e.g. [47] and [78]) subsequence of partial sums are bounded from to for every , from which we obtain that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, (see e.g. [61]) there exist a martingale such that
[TABLE]
The main reason of divergence of subsequence of partial sums it that (for details see [62]) Fourier coefficients of are not uniformly bounded when .
When in [74] was investigated boundedness of subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system from to . In particular, the following result is true:
Theorem T1. Let and . Then there exists a absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
if and only if the following condition holds
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
In particular, Theorem T1 immediately follows:
Theorem T2. Let and . Then there exists a absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand, we have the following result:
Theorem T3. Let . Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
Taking into account these results it is interesting to find behaviour of rate of divergence of subsequences of partials sums with respect to Walsh system of martingale in the martingale Hardy spaces .
In the second chapter of this thesis (see also [63]) we investigate ebove mentioned problem. For we have the following result:
Theorem 2.10. Let . Then there exists a absolute constant depending only on , such that the following inequality is true
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if be increasing subsequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Theorem 2.11 easily follows the following corollary:
Corollary 2.11. Let and . Then there exists a absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
In particular, we also get the proofs of Theorem T1 and Theorem T2.
In the second chapter of this thesis we also investigate case . In this case the following result is true:
Theorem 2.12. Let and Then there exists a absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, if be increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
When in [74] was proved boundedness of maximal operators of subsequences of partial sums from to . In particular, the following is true:
Theorem T4. Let and . Then the maximal operator
[TABLE]
is bounded from to , if and only if condition (1.3) is fulfilled.
In the special cases we obtain that the following is true:
Theorem T5. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand we have the following result:
Theorem T6. Let . Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
Above mentioned condition (1.3) is sufficient condition for the case also, but there exist subsequences which do not satisfy this condition, but maximal operators of these subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system are not bounded from to .
Such necessary and sufficient conditions which provides boundedness of maximal operators of subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system from to is open problem.
In [62] and [74] was investigated boundedness of weighted maximal operators from to , when :
Theorem T7. Let . Then weighted maximal operator
[TABLE]
is bounded from to , where denotes integer part of .
Moreover, for any non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
According to negative result for weighted maximal operator of partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series we immediately get the following result:
Theorem S1. There exists a martingale , , such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, boundedness of weighted maximal operators immediately follows the following estimation:
Theorem S2. Let . Then there exists a absolute constant , depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
where denotes integer part of .
By applying this inequality (see [60]) we find necessary and sufficient conditions for martingale for which partial sums with respect to Walsh system of martingale converge in norm.
Theorem T8. Let , denotes integer part of , and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exists a martingale , where , such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By taking these results into account, it is interesting to find necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity, such that subsequences of partial sums with respect to Walsh system of martingale converge in norm.
In the second chapter of this thesis (see also [63]) we investigate this problem. By combining inequalities (1.4) and (1.6) we get the following theorem:
Theorem 2.16. Let Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By applying inequality (1.8) the following result is proved in the second chapter:
Theorem 2.17. Let and be increasing sequence of natural number satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if be increasing sequence of natural numbers satisfying the condition (1.5), then there exists a martingale and subsequence for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant depending only on .
According to this theorem we immediately get that the following result is true:
Corollary 2.18. Let and be increasing sequence of natural number, satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then (1.10) holds.
On the other hand, if be increasing sequence of natural number, satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale and subsequence such that
[TABLE]
and (1.11) holds.
By applying (1.9) we prove that the following is true:
Theorem 2.19. Let and be increasing sequence of natural number, satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, if be increasing sequence of natural number, satisfying the condition (1.5), then there exists a martingale and subsequence for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant.
By applying Theorem 2.17 and Theorem 2.19 we immediately get proof of Theorem T8.
Weisz [79] consider convergence in norm of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier and proved the following:
Theorem We1. Let and . Then there exists a absolute constant , depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
Weisz (for details see e.g. [78]) also consider boundedness of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series from to when :
Theorem We2. Let and . Then
[TABLE]
On the other hand, in [56] was proved the following result:
Theorem T9. There exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Goginava [27] (see also [44]) proved that the following result is true:
Theorem Gog1. Let Then the sequence of operators are not bounded from to .
When then in [45] was proved bondedness of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier from to . In particular, the following is true:
Theorem T10. Let and . Then there exists a absolute constant , depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
estimation holds if and only if the condition (1.3) is fulfilled.
Theorem T10 immediately follows theorem of Weisz (see Theorem We2) and and also interesting results:
Theorem T11. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand, we have the following result:
Theorem T12. Let . Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
According to above mentioned results it is interesting to find rate of divergence of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the Hardy spaces .
In the third chapter of this thesis (see also [64]) we find rate of divergence of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces , when .
First, we consider case :
Theorem 3.28. Let and Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, if be increasing secuence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the conditions
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
There was also considered case and was proved that the following is true:
Theorem 3.29. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if be increasing sequence of natural numbers satisfying the condition (1.5) and be non-decreasing function such that
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
From these results also follows proof of Theorem We2.
In 1975 Schipp [46] (see also [86]) proved that the maximal operator of Fejér means is of type weak-(1,1):
[TABLE]
By using Marcinkiewicz interpolation theorem it follows that is of strong type-, when
[TABLE]
The boundedness does not hold for but Fujji [15] (see also [84]) proved that maximal operator of Fejér means is bounded from to . Weisz in [80] generalized result of Fujii and proved that maximal operator of Fejér means is bounded from to , when Simon [48] construct the counterexample, which shows that boundedness does not hold when . Goginava [21] (see also [9] and [10]) generalized this result for and proved that the following is true:
Theorem Gog2. There exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Weisz [81] (see also Goginava [23]) proved that the following is true:
Theorem We3. Let . Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
In [45] was considered boundedness of maximal operators of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series from to for . In particular, the following is true:
Theorem T13. Let and . Then the maximal operator
[TABLE]
is bounded from to if and only if when condition (1.3) is fulfilled.
As consequences the following results are true:
Theorem T14. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand, we have the following negative result:
Theorem T15. Let Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
above mentioned condition is sufficient for the case also, but there exists subsequences, which do not satisfy condition (1.3), but maximal operator of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series are bounded from to
However, it is open problem to find necessary and sufficient conditions on the indexes, which provide boundedness of maximal operator of subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series from to .
In [22] and [56] (see also [43], [58], [29] and [55]) is proved that the following is true:
Theorem GT1. Let and . Then the maximal operator
[TABLE]
is bounded from to .
Moreover, for any nondecreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
From the divergence of weighted maximal operators we immediately get that there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
and from the boundedness results of weighted maximal operators we immediately get that for any there exists an absolute constant , such that the following inequality holds true:
[TABLE]
By applying inequality (1.16) in [60] was found necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity of martingale , for which Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in norm.
Theorem T16. Let , and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exists a martingale , for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
According above mentioned results, it is interesting to find necessary and sufficient conditions for the modulus of continuity, for which subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in norm.
In the third chapter of this thesis we find necessary and sufficient conditions for the modulus of continuity, for which subsequences of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in norm (see also [64]).
By applying inequality (1.13) for the case the following necessary and sufficient conditions are found:
Theorem 3.33. Let and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, if be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that (1.5) holds true, then there exists a martingale and subsequence such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
wher is an absolute constant.
By applying inequality (1.14) we also investigate case . In the third chapter of this thesis we prove that the following is true:
Theorem 3.34. Let and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
On the other hand, if be increasing sequence of natural numbers satisfying the condition (1.5), then there exists a martingale and subsequence for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is constant depending only on .
However, Simon in [49] and [51] (see also [13, 52]) consider strong convergence theorems of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fouriere series and proved the following:
Theorem Si1. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that the following inequality is true:
[TABLE]
Analigical result for trigonometric system was proved in [53], for unbounded Walsh systems in [17].
In [57] was proved that the following is true:
Theorem T17. for any and non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
Theorem Si1 follows that if then the following equalities are true:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
When and then Theorem Si1 follows that there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
It follows the following equality
[TABLE]
In the third chapter of this thesis we consider strong convergence results of Fejér means of the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series. According to Theorem We1 and Theorem Gog2 we only have to consider case (for details see [59], see also [4], [5], [7], [8], [12]):
Theorem 3.37. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, let and * * be non-decreasing, non-negative function, such that and
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
When is was also proved that the following is true:
Theorem 3.38. Let Then
[TABLE]
Theorem 3.37 follows that if then the following equalities are true:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
When and then Theorem 3.37 follows that there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
For the two-dimensional case (for details see e.g. [47] and [78]) the following is true:
Theorem S3. Let and . Then
[TABLE]
Moreover,
Theorem S4. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
By applying Theorem S4 we can conclude that the following holds true (for details see e.g. [47] and [78]):
Theorem S5. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, (see [61]) the following is true:
Theorem T18. Let Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
However, for the two-dimensional case Weisz [77] proved the following:
Theorem We4. Let and Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
where and denotes integer part of real number .
Moreover, sharpness of of the rates of weights are proved [72] was proved that rate of the is sharp.
Goginava and Gogoladze in [28] generalized this result in the case when :
Theorem GG1. Let . Then there exists an absolute constant , such that
[TABLE]
In [65] was proved that rate of the weights is sharp. The following is true:
Theorem T19. Let be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition Then
[TABLE]
Theorem GG1 follows that if then
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
It follows the following equality
[TABLE]
In the fourth chapter (see also [66]) of this thesis we consider strong convergence of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series when :
Theorem 4.49 Let and Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, if and be non-decreasing function satifying condition , then there exists martingale such that
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.49 follows that, if and then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
It follows the following equality
[TABLE]
Weisz (for details see e.g. [78]) consider Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series and proved the following:
Theorem We5. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Goginava [26] proved that the following is true:
Theorem Gog2. Let . Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
Goginava in [24] consider subsequence of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series and proved that the following is true:
Theorem Gog3. Let and . Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
In [37] was investigated strong convergence theorems of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series when :
Theorem NT1. Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, if and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition and
[TABLE]
then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Theorem NT1 follows that if and then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
It follows the following equality:
[TABLE]
In the fourth chapter (see [35]) we consider strong convergence results of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series, when :
Theorem 4.50 Let Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
From these results we obtain that, if then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
For the two-dimensional case Weisz [83] proved that the following is true:
Theorem We6. Let and . Then the maximal operator of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series is bounded from to :
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant, depending only on .
Goginava [25] also proved that the following is true:
Theorem Gog4. Let . Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Goginava [26] also consider restricted maximal operator of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series and show that the following is true:
Theorem Gog5. Let and Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Moreover, there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
In [34] and [37] we investigate boundedness of weighted maximal operators when :
Theorem NT2. Let Then the maximal operator
[TABLE]
is bounded from to .
Moreover, if be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
From Theorem NT2 we get that for and , there exists a absolute constant depending only on , such that:
[TABLE]
By applying inequality (1.23) in [37] (see also [38]) we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity of martingale , for which Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional partial sums of Walsh-Fourier series of converge in norm.
Theorem NT3. Let f\in H_{p}\left(G^{2}\right)\ and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, if then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
If we apply again (1.23) and improve method which was investigated in [37] in the fourth chapter (see also [36]) we obtain that the following is true:
Theorem 4.52. Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
On the other hand, there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
2 Partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
2.1 Basic notations
Denote by the set of the positive integers and by the set of non-negative integers. Denote by the additive group of integers modulo- which contains only two elements group operation is modulo- sum and all sets are open.
Define the group as the complete direct product of the groups with the product of the discrete topologies . The direct product of the measures is the Haar measure on with
The elements of are represented by sequences
[TABLE]
It is easy to give a base for the neighbourhood of
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Set for any and .
It is evident that
[TABLE]
If then it can be uniquely expressed as
[TABLE]
where and only a finite number of s differ from zero.
Set
[TABLE]
It is evident that
Let
[TABLE]
Denote by variation of natural number
[TABLE]
Define -th Rademacher functions by
[TABLE]
By using Rademacher functions we define Walsh system as:
[TABLE]
The norm (quasi-norm) of space is defined as
[TABLE]
and norm (quasi-norm) of space is defined by
[TABLE]
Walsh system is orthonormal and complete in (see [47]).
For any the numbers
[TABLE]
are called -th Walsh-Fourier coefficient of .
-th partial sum is denoted by
[TABLE]
Dirichlet kernels are defined by
[TABLE]
We also define the following maximal operators
[TABLE]
The -algebra generated by the intervals with measure is denoted by Conditional exponential operator with respect to is denoted by and it is given by
[TABLE]
where denotes length of set .
Sequence of functions is called dyadic martingale (for details see [39], [47]) if
is measurable with respect to algebras for any ,
for any .
The maximal function of a martingale is defined by
[TABLE]
In the case the maximal functions are also be given by:
[TABLE]
For the Hardy martingale space consists of all martingales, for which
[TABLE]
A bounded measurable function is said to be a -atom if there exists an dyadic interval , such that
[TABLE]
It is easy to show that for martingale and for any there exists a limit
[TABLE]
and it is called -th Walsh-Fourier coefficients of .
If and is regular martingale then
[TABLE]
The modulus of continuity in space is defined by
[TABLE]
It is important to describe how can be understood difference , where be martingale is a function:
Remark 2.1
Let Since
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Under the difference we mean the following martingale:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Consequently, the norm is understood as -norm of
[TABLE]
.
Watari [75] showed that there are strong connections between
[TABLE]
In particular,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
2.2 Auxiliary lemmas
First we present and prove equalities and estimations of Dirichlet kernel and Lebesgue constants with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier systems (see Lemmas 2.2-3.26).
First equality of the following Lemma is proved in [47] and second identity is proved in [18]:
Lemma 2.2
Let . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The following estimation of Dirichlet kernel with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier systems is proved in [47]:
Lemma 2.3
Let . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The following two-sided estimations of Lebesgue constants with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier systems is proved in [47] and second equality is proved in [14]:
Lemma 2.4
Let Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Hardy martingale space for any can be characterize by simple functions which are called -atoms. The following is true (for details see [50], [78] and [82]):
Lemma 2.5
A martingale belongs to if and only if there exists a sequence of -atoms of and sequence of real numbers such that for all ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
where the infimum is taken over all decomposition of of the form (2.2).
The next five Examples of martingales will be used many times to prove sharpness of our main results. Such counterexamples first appear in the papers of Goginava [24] (see also [23]). Such constructions of martingales are also used in the papers [3], [4], [11], [32], [33], [36], [40], [41], [54], [59], [63], [64], [66], [67], [68], [72], [73], [71], [73]. For the one-dimensional case we use martingales which were used in [74]. So, we leave out the details of proof.
Example 2.6
Let be sequence of real numbers
[TABLE]
and be sequence of -atoms, given by
[TABLE]
where and denotes -th binary coefficients of real number of . Then where
[TABLE]
is martingale, which belongs to for any .
It is easy to show that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, for the modulus of continuity for we have the following estimation:
[TABLE]
By applying Lemma 2.5 we easily obtain that the following is true (see [82]):
Lemma 2.7
Let and be -sub-linear operator, such that, for any -atom ,
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
In addition, if is bounded from to then to prove (2.8) it is suffices to show that
[TABLE]
for every -atom , where denotes support of the atom .
In the concrete cases the norm of Hardy martingale spaces can be calculated by simpler formulas (for details see [50], [78] and [79]):
Lemma 2.8
If and be regular martingale, then norm can be calculated by
[TABLE]
The following lemmas are proved in [59], [63], [64].
Lemma 2.9
Let , and be -th partial sum with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series, where . Then for any fixed ,
[TABLE]
Proof: Let consider the following martingales
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Hence, Lemma 2.8 immediately follows that
[TABLE]
Lemma is proved.
2.3 Boundedness of subsequences of partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we consider boundedness of subsequences of partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces (for details see [63]).
Theorem 2.10
a) Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
b) Let be non-negative, increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Suppose that
[TABLE]
By combining Lemma 2.9 and inequalities (1.7) and (2.11), since we obtain that
[TABLE]
By combining Lemma 2.7 and (2.3) it is suficies to show that
[TABLE]
for every -atom , with support , such that .
Without loss the generality we may assume that -atom has support Then it is easy to see that where . So, we may assume that . Since we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let . Since by using first estimations of Lemma 2.4 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let and where or Then and if we use both equality of Lemma 2.3 we get that and it follows that
[TABLE]
Let Then where . Then by using again both equality of Lemma 2.3 we have that
[TABLE]
If we apply again (2.3) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
By identity (2.1) and inequalities (2.16) and (2.3) we find that
[TABLE]
Now, we prove part b) of Theorem 2.10. By using condition (2.10) there exists sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale from the Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
Then, if we use (2.18) we obtain that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that
If we apply (2.4) when are given by the formula (2.19) then we get that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In the view of (2.6) when are given by (2.19) we get that
[TABLE]
by using (2.18) for we have that
[TABLE]
Let Since and
By using both inequalities of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By combining (2.3) and (2.3) we get that
[TABLE]
The proof of Theorem 2.10 is complete.
Corollary 2.11
a) Let , and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
b) Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: By applying both inequalities of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.11 is proved.
Theorem 2.12
a) Let and Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
b) Let be non-negative increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and be non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Since
[TABLE]
by combining Lemmas 2.9 and (2.29) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Now prove second part of Theorem 2.12. Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers and function satisfies conditions (2.27) and (2.28). Then there exists non-negative, increasing sequence such that
[TABLE]
Let be martingale from Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
By applying condition (2.31) we can conclude that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that
In the view of (2.4) when are given by (2.32) we get that
[TABLE]
Analogously to (2.3) if we apply (2.6) when are given by (2.32) we get that
[TABLE]
By applying first estimation of Lemma 2.4 and (2.31) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Theorem 2.12 is proved.
Corollary 2.13
Let , and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Proof: To prove Theorem 2.13 we only have to show that
[TABLE]
By applying first part of Theorem 2.10 we immediately get that (2.34) for any and proof of Corollary 2.13 is proved.
Corollary 2.14
Let , and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Since
[TABLE]
by first part of Theorem 2.10 we get that (2.35) holds, for any and proof of Corollary 2.14 is complete.
Corollary 2.15
Let and Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, there exists an absolute constant , such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Since
[TABLE]
by applying second part of Theorem 2.10 we get that there exists a martingale for such that (2.36) holds.
On the other hand, proof of (2.37) follows simple observation that
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.15 is proved.
2.4 Modulus of continuity and convergence in norm of subsequences of partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we apply Theorem 2.10 and Theorem 2.12 to find necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity, for which subsequences of partial sums with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series are bounded in the martingale Hardy spaces.
First, we prove the following estimation:
Theorem 2.16
Let and Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof: Let and By applying first part of Theorem 2.10 we get that
[TABLE]
The proof of (2.40) is analogical to (2.39). Analogously to (2.39) we can also prove estimation (2.40). So, we leave out the details.
Theorem 2.16 is proved.
Theorem 2.17
a) Let , and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers,such that condition (2.9) is fulfilled. Then there exists a martingale and increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant depending only on .
Proof: Let , and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that condition (2.42) is fulfilled. By combining Theorem 2.16 and estimation (2.39) we get that (2.43) holds true.
Now, prove second part of Theorem 2.17. In the view of (2.9) we simply get that there exists sequence such that
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale from Example 2.6, such that
[TABLE]
By applying (2.45) we obtain that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that
By applying (2.4), whene are given by (2.46), then
[TABLE]
By combining (2.45) and (2.7) we have that
[TABLE]
By using (2.3) we get that
[TABLE]
In the view of (2.6) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
if we apply (1.2) (see also Theorem T2) we obtain that
[TABLE]
Proof of Theorem 2.17 is complete.
Corollary 2.18
a) Let and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then (2.43) holds.
b) Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then there exist a martingale and sequence such that
[TABLE]
and (2.44) holds.
Theorem 2.19
a) Let and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that condition (2.27) is fulfilled. Then there exists a martingale and increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant.
Proof: Let and be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that (2.51). By applying Theorem 2.16 we get that condition (2.52) is fulfilled.
Now, we prove second part of Theorem 2.19. By applying (2.27) we conclude that there exists sequence , such that
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale from the Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
By applying (2.54) we conclude that (2.3) is fulfilled and we conclude that
In the view of (2.4) we have that
[TABLE]
According to (2.7) we get that
[TABLE]
By applying (2.6) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
If we use (1.2) and Theorem T2 we get that
[TABLE]
The proof of Theorem 2.19 is proved.
Theorem 3.34 follows the following corollaries which are [61]:
Corollary 2.20
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) There exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Corollary 2.21
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) There exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
3 Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
3.1 Basic notations
Fot the one-dimensional case Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series is defined by:
[TABLE]
The following equality is true (for details see [2] and [47]):
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
In the literature is called -th Fejér kernel.
We also define the following maximal operators
[TABLE]
.
For any natural number we also need the following expression
[TABLE]
Set
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Then, for any natural number there exists numbers
[TABLE]
such that it can be written as
[TABLE]
where is depending on .
It is evident that
[TABLE]
3.2 Auxiliary lemmas
The following equality and estimation of Fejér kernels with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series is proved in [47]:
Lemma 3.22
Let and . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant.
The following equality is proved in [47] (see also [16]):
Lemma 3.23
Let and . Then we have the following expression for -th Fejér kernels with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series:
[TABLE]
The following estimation is proved by Goginava [22]:
Lemma 3.24
Let Then
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant.
The following estimations of Fejér kernels with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series is proved in [64]:
Lemma 3.25
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
where is an absolute constant.
Proof: Let
[TABLE]
By using Lemma 3.22 for -th Fejér kernels we can conclude that
[TABLE]
For we have the following equality
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
we obtain that
[TABLE]
If we apply estimations
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
we get that
[TABLE]
Let where Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
If where then
[TABLE]
By using these estimations we can conclude that
[TABLE]
By combining (3.1)-(3.2) we get the proof of Lemma 3.25.
The following estimations of Fejér kernels with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series is proved in [64]:
Lemma 3.26
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
Proof: If we apply Lemma 3.22 for we can write that
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.23 follows that
[TABLE]
Since , we easily obtain that the following estimation is true:
[TABLE]
For we get that
[TABLE]
By combining (3.3-3.5) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Suppose that . Then
[TABLE]
If or , then by applying (3.6) we get that
[TABLE]
Lemma is proved.
The following estimations of Fejér kernels with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series is proved in [64] (see also [74]):
Lemma 3.27
Let , and be Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series, where . Then, for any fixed ,
[TABLE]
Proof: Let consider the following martingale
[TABLE]
By using Lemma 2.8 we immediately get
[TABLE]
Lemma is proved.
3.3 Boundedness of subsequences of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we study boundedness of subsequences of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces (For details see [64]).
First, we consider case . The following estimation is true:
Theorem 3.28
a) Let Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
b) Let be increasing sequence of natural numbers, such that and be non-decreasing function satisfying the conditions and
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Suppose that
[TABLE]
By combining estimations (1.7), (1.15) and Lemma 3.27 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
By combining Lemma 2.7 and (3.3), Theorem 3.28 will be proved if we show that
[TABLE]
for any -atom .
Without loss the generality we may assume that is -atom, with support for which It is easy to check that when Therefore, we may assume that Set
[TABLE]
Let Since is bounded from to , for and by using Lemma 3.24 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
Since we obtain that Theorem 3.28 will be proved if we show that
[TABLE]
where or .
Let and or Since by applying Lemma 3.23 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let Then where and if we apply again Lemma 3.23 we get that
[TABLE]
Analogously to (3.12) for we can prove that
[TABLE]
Let where According to (2.1) and (3.11-3.13) we find that
[TABLE]
Let Analogously to we can prove (3.10), for
Now, prove boundedness of . Let and Since if we apply first equality of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
Let Since and if we apply first equality of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
Let Then for any and by first equality of Lemma 2.3 we have that
[TABLE]
Let Then, in the view of (2.1) and (3.14-3.16) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Analogously, we can prove same estimations in the cases and
Now, we prove part b) of Theorem 3.28. According to (3.7), there exists increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
Let be martingale form Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
According to (3.17) we get that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that .
By applying (2.4) we get that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let If we apply (2.6) we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
For we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Since (see theorems 2.10 and 3.28)
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By combining (3.3), (3.3) and Lemma 3.26 we get that
[TABLE]
Theorem 3.28 is proved.
Theorem 3.29
a) Let Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
b) Let and be non-decreasing function such that
[TABLE]
Then there exist a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Let Analogously to (3.3) it is sufficient to prove that
[TABLE]
for every -atom , where denotes support of the atom.
Analogously to Theorem 3.28 we may assume that is -atom with support , and Since we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let Then, by applying Lemma 3.23 we get that where and hence,
[TABLE]
Let or Then Lemma 3.25 follows that
[TABLE]
By combining (2.1), (3.23) and (3.3) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Now, we prove part b) of Theorem 3.29. According to (3.22) there exists an increasing sequence of natural numbers such that and
[TABLE]
Let be martingale from Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
If we apply (3.25) we get that (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that According to (2.4) we have that
[TABLE]
Let Then, analogously to (3.19) and (3.3), if we apply (3.26) we get that
[TABLE]
Let and Since analogously to (3.3), if we apply Lemma 3.26 for we have the following estimation
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
By combining Corollary 2.13 and first part of Theorem 3.29 we find that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, for sufficiently large we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Theorem 3.29 is proved.
The proofs of Corollaries 3.30-3.32 are similar to the proofs of Corollaries 2.13-2.15. So, we leave out the details of proofs and just present these results:
Corollary 3.30
Let and . Then
[TABLE]
Corollary 3.31
Let and . Then
[TABLE]
Corollary 3.32
Let . Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, for any the following is true:
[TABLE]
3.4 Modulus of continuity and convergence in norm of subsequences of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we apply Theorem 3.28 and Theorem 3.29 to find necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity of martingale , for which subsequences of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series converge in -norm.
First, we prove the following result:
Theorem 3.33
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) Let Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof: Let and Then
[TABLE]
It is evident that
[TABLE]
Let By combining Corollaries 2.13 and 3.30 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Now, we prove part b) of Theorem 3.33. Since then there exists a martingale such that as and
[TABLE]
Let be martingale from Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
If we apply (3.30) we get that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that By using (2.4) we find that
[TABLE]
By combining (2.7) and (3.30) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let By using (2.6) we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
According to (1.2), (1.12) and (3.4) we have that
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By using Lemma 3.26 we get that
[TABLE]
By combining estimations (3.4-3.4), Corollaries 2.13 and 3.30 we get that (3.29) holds true and Theorem 3.33 is proved.
Theorem 3.34
a) Let , and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) Let Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof: ** **Let Then under condition (3.36) if we repeat steps of the proof of Theorem 3.33, we immediately get that (3.37) holds.
Let prove part b) of Theorem 3.34. Since there exists such that and
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale from Lemma 2.6, where
[TABLE]
If we use (3.40) we conclude that condition (2.3) is fulfilled and it follows that
According to (2.4) we get that
[TABLE]
By combining (2.7) and (3.40) we have that
[TABLE]
Analogously to the proof of previous theorem, if we use also Corollaries 2.13 and 3.30, for the sufficiently large we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let Lemma 3.26 follows that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Hence, by combining (1.2), (1.12), (3.4) and (3.44) we get that
[TABLE]
The proof of Theorem 3.34 is complete.
By using Theorem 3.34 we easily get an important result which was proved in [60]:
Corollary 3.35
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) There exists a martingale for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Corollary 3.36
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) Then there exists a martingale for which
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
3.5 Strong convergence of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we consider strong convergence results of Fejér means with respect to the one-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces, when (for details see [59]).
The following is true:
Theorem 3.37
a) Let and . Then there exists a constant depending only on , such that
[TABLE]
b) Let be non-decreasing function, such that and
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Suppose that
[TABLE]
By combining (1.7), (1.15) and Lemma 3.27 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
According to Lemma 2.7 and (3.45) Theorem 3.37 will be proved if we show that
[TABLE]
for any -atom . We may assume that is -atom, with support , and It is evident that when Therefore, we may assume that
Let Since is bounded from to (The boundedness follows fact that Fejér kernels are uniformly bounded in the space , which is proved in Lemma 3.22) and we can conclude that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
It is evident that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.23 follows that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
If we use identity (2.1) and (3.46-3.47) we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
The proof of part a) of theorem 3.37 is complete.
Now, we prove part b) of Theorem 3.37. Let non-decreasing function satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
According to (3.49), there exists an increasing sequence such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale from the Example 2.6, where
[TABLE]
By combining (2.3) and (3.5) we get that According to (2.4) we have that
[TABLE]
Let Then
[TABLE]
It is evident that
[TABLE]
Let where If we apply (2.6) we get that
[TABLE]
Let Then if we use (2.6) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let Since (see Lemmas 2.3 and 3.23)
[TABLE]
by combining (3.50) and (3.56-3.59) we get that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
If we use (3.5) when for we can write that
[TABLE]
By combining (3.50) and (3.59) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Let and . Since Lemmas 2.2 and 3.22 and (3.59) follows that
[TABLE]
Let and By combining (3.55-3.5) we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
The proof of Theorem 3.37 is complete.
Theorem 3.38
Let Then
[TABLE]
Proof: Let and
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
we conclude that is -atom, for every
Moreover, if we use orthogonality of Walsh functions we get that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where .
By combining first equality of Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.8 we obtain that
[TABLE]
It is easy to easy to show that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let By using first equality of Lemma 2.2 we have that
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
By applying Lemma 3.26 and (3.5) we find that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
According to the second estimation of Lemma 2.4 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
The proof is complete.
4 Convergence and summability of partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
4.1 Basic notations
Let denote by the two-dimensional vector and by the direct product of two Walsh groups. Let for any and .
The norms (or quasi-norms) of the spaces of space is defined by
[TABLE]
The space consists of all functions for which
[TABLE]
Two-dimensional Walsh system is defined by
[TABLE]
The two-dimensional Walsh system is orthonormal and complete (see [47]).
For the following number
[TABLE]
is called -th Fourier coeficients of function .
-th rectangular partial sum of function is defined by:
[TABLE]
-th Marcinkiewicz (Marcinkiewicz-Fejér) means of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series of function is defined by
[TABLE]
Dirichlet and Marcinkiewicz kernels of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series are defined by
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
For the partial sums of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier let as define
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
For the partial sums of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier let define the following maximal operators and by
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
We define the maximal operator and restricted maximal operator of Marcinkiewicz means by
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
For the partial sums of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier let define the following weighted maximal operators
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The -algebra generated by the two-dimensional cubes
[TABLE]
is defined by .
The conditional expectation operator with respect to is denoted by and in our concrete case we have the following explicit expression for it:
[TABLE]
where denotes measure of cube .
Sequence of functions is called dyadic martingales if (for details see [47])
is measurable with respect to algebra , for any ,
for every .
The maximal function of martingale is defined by
[TABLE]
If then it is weell-known that the maximal operator is defined by
[TABLE]
For the one-parameter martingale Hardy space consist of all martingales for which
[TABLE]
Next, we define -atoms, which are very important to characterize martingale Hardy spaces.
A function is called a -atom, if there exists an interval , such that
[TABLE]
It is easy to check that for every martingale and for every the limit
[TABLE]
exists and it is called -th Walsh-Fourier coefficients of .
If and is regular martingale, then
[TABLE]
For the two-dimensional case modulus of continuity in spaces can be defined as
[TABLE]
It is necessary to describe how can be understood difference where is martingale and is function. The following is true:
Remark 4.39
Let Since
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
we obtain that is martingale for which
[TABLE]
and norm
[TABLE]
can be understood as norm of martingale
[TABLE]
4.2 Auxillary lemmas
In the following lemmas we investigate estimations of Marcinkiewicz means of the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series (see Lemma 4.40-Lemma 4.43).
Glukhov [19] proved that the following is true:
Lemma 4.40
There exists an absolute constant , such that
[TABLE]
The following lemma is proved in [25]:
Lemma 4.41
Let , and . Then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
For our further investigation we need the following lemma (for details see [25]):
Lemma 4.42
Let and Then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
We also need the following lemma proved by Goginava [20]:
Lemma 4.43
Let
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Hardy martingale spaces have atomic decomposition for . The following is true (for details see [50], [78] and [79]):
Lemma 4.44
A martingale belongs to if and only if there exist a sequence of p-atoms and sequence of real numbers such that for every
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
where infimum is taken over all decomposition of of the form (4.1).
Lemma 4.45
Let and be -sublinear operator, such that
[TABLE]
for any -atom . Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
In addition, if is bounded from to , then we only have to prove that
[TABLE]
for every -atom , where denotes support of and .
In special cases there exists simpler ways how to calculate -norm of martingale (For details see e.g. [50], [78] and [79]):
Lemma 4.46
Let and be regular martingale. Then norm is calculated by
[TABLE]
Proofs of Lemma 4.47 and Lemma 4.48 are proved in [35], [36], [66].
Lemma 4.47
Let , and be -th partial sum, where . Then for any fixed we have the following estimation:
[TABLE]
Proof: Let consider the following martingale
[TABLE]
By using Lemma 4.46 we immediately get that
[TABLE]
The proof is complete.
Lemma 4.48
Let , and be -th Marcinkiewicz means, where . Then for any fixed we get that
[TABLE]
Proof: Let consider the following martingale
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
According to Lemma 4.46 we immediately get
[TABLE]
The proof is complete.
4.3 Strong convergence of partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we investigate strong convergence of partial sums with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces when (see [66]). The following theorem is true:
Theorem 4.49
a) Let and . Then there exists an absolute constant depending only on such that
[TABLE]
b) Let and be non-decreasing function, satisfying the condition
[TABLE]
Then there exists a martingale , such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Suppose that
[TABLE]
By combining Lemma 2.9 and inequality (1.18) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
According to Lemma 4.45 we only have to prove that
[TABLE]
for avery -atom .
Let be -atom with support , where . Without loss the generality we may assume that
Let . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
If we apply where and according to both equality of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Let where By using again Lemma 2.3 can conclude that
[TABLE]
By using (2.1) we have that
[TABLE]
From (4.3) we get that
[TABLE]
Let . Since where we obtain that
[TABLE]
So, we may assume that If we apply Holder’s inequality we get that
[TABLE]
Let . Then
[TABLE]
By applying (4.3) we get that
[TABLE]
Let . By applyng definition of -atom we get that
[TABLE]
Therefore, we can suppose that . If follows that
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
if we use Holder’s inequality we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
Analogously, we can prove that
[TABLE]
Let . Then by the definition of -atom we get that
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
By combining (4.4-4.3) we get that Theorem 4.49 is proved.
Let and satisfies condition 4.3. Then there exists increasing sequence of natural numbers such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let be a martingale
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By applying (4.10) and Lemma 4.44 we obtain that
It is evident that
[TABLE]
Let . By combining (4.11) and first equality of Lemma 2.2 we get that
[TABLE]
Let and n\ is odd number. Since n-2^{2\alpha_{k}}\ is also odd, according to both equality of Lemma 2.3 we get that
[TABLE]
If we apply again second equality of Lemma 2.3 according to condition for we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
By using (4.3) we get that
[TABLE]
Theorem is proved.
4.4 Strong convergence of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we consider strong convergence of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in the martingale Hardy spaces for (for details see Nagy and Tephnadze [35]).
Theorem 4.50
Let . Then there exists an absolute constant such that
[TABLE]
Proof: Suppose that
[TABLE]
By combining Lemma 4.48 and inequalities (1.18), (1.22), (4.17) we get that
[TABLE]
Since is (see Lemma 4.40) bounded from to , if we use Lemma 4.45 we only have to prove that
[TABLE]
for every -atom .
Let be -atom with support , where . Without loss the generality we may assume that . It is easy to show that for So, we may assume that .
We can write that
[TABLE]
By applying Lemma 4.40 we have that
[TABLE]
Now, we estimate . Set
[TABLE]
We introduce and as the following disjoint union:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Let According to Lemma 4.42 we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
Analogously, we can prove that .
Next we prove boundedness of . If we apply (4.19) we get that
[TABLE]
Let consider (Analogously we can estimate ). For if we apply Lemma 4.41 we obtain that
[TABLE]
It is evident that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Corollary 4.51
Let Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
4.5 Modulus of continuity and convergence in norm of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on the martingale Hardy spaces
In this section we investigate necessary and sufficient conditions for modulus of continuity, which provide convergence in norm of Marcinkiewicz means with respect to the two-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series in -norm (For details see [37]).
Theorem 4.52
a) Let and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
b) There exists a martingale such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof: In [34] it was proved that (see inequality (1.23)) the following inequality is true:
[TABLE]
If we apply inequality (1.22) and Lemma 4.48 according to (4.21) we get the following estimation
[TABLE]
Let If we use (4.22) by simple calculations we have that
[TABLE]
Let Then it is evident that
[TABLE]
By combining (1.19) and (1.21) we get that
[TABLE]
Hence, we immediately get that if
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
Now, prove part b) of Theorem 4.52. Let
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Since
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
by using Lemma 4.44, we conclude that
On the other hand, if we apply Remark 4.39 we immediately get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
where denotes integer part of .
Set
[TABLE]
If we use Lemma 4.43 we get that
[TABLE]
It is evident that
[TABLE]
Let Since when , if we apply (4.25) and first equality of Lemma 2.2 we obtain that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
By applying (4.5) we have that
[TABLE]
Set
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
According to Lemma 4.43 we get that
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
By combining (1.17), (1.21) and (4.26) we can conclude that
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.52 is proved.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] G. N. Agaev, N. Ya. Vilenkin, G. M. Dzhafarly and A. I. Rubinshtein, Multiplicative systems of functions and harmonic analysis on zero-dimensional groups, Baku, Ehim, 1981 (in Russian).
- 2[2] N. K. Bary, Trigonometric series, Gos. Izd. Fiz. Mat. Lit. Moscow 1961.
- 3[3] L. Baramidze, L. E. Persson, G. Tephnadze, P. Wall, Sharp H p − L p subscript 𝐻 𝑝 subscript 𝐿 𝑝 H_{p}-L_{p} type inequalities of weighted maximal operators of Vilenkin-Nörlund means and its applications, J. Inequal. Appl., 2016, DOI: 10.1186/s 13660-016-1182-1.
- 4[4] I. Blahota, G. Tephnadze, A note on maximal operators of Vilenkin-Nörlund means, Acta Math. Acad. Paed. Nyíreg., 32 (2016), 203–213.
- 5[5] I. Blahota, G. Tephnadze, R. Toledo, Strong convergence theorem of ( C , α ) 𝐶 𝛼 (C,\alpha) -means with respect to the Walsh system, Tohoku Math. J., 67, 4 (2015), 573-584.
- 6[6] I. Blahota, L. E. Persson, G. Tephnadze, On the Nörlund means of Vilenkin-Fourier series, Czech. Math J., 65, 4 (2015), 983-1002.
- 7[7] I. Blahota, G. Tephnadze, On the ( C , α ) 𝐶 𝛼 (C,\alpha) -means with respect to the Walsh system, Anal. Math., 40 (2014), 161-174.
- 8[8] I. Blahota, G. Tephnadze, Strong convergence theorem for Vilenkin-Fejér means, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 85 (1-2) (2014), 181–196.
