# Finding the limit of incompleteness I

**Authors:** Yong Cheng

arXiv: 1902.06658 · 2023-09-13

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the boundaries of G"odel's first incompleteness theorem, constructing theories with minimal interpretability and Turing degrees where the theorem still applies, revealing limits of its applicability.

## Contribution

It introduces new theories weaker than Robinson's R for which G"odel's theorem holds, and demonstrates the non-existence of a minimal Turing degree for such theories.

## Key findings

- Existence of theories weaker than R where G1 holds
- Construction of theories based on recursively inseparable pairs
- No minimal Turing degree for G1 applicability

## Abstract

In this paper, we examine the limit of applicability of G\"{o}del's first incompleteness theorem ($\sf G1$ for short). We first define the notion "$\sf G1$ holds for the theory $T$". This paper is motivated by the following question: can we find a theory with a minimal degree of interpretation for which $\sf G1$ holds. To approach this question, we first examine the following question: is there a theory $T$ such that Robinson's $\mathbf{R}$ interprets $T$ but $T$ does not interpret $\mathbf{R}$ (i.e. $T$ is weaker than $\mathbf{R}$ w.r.t. interpretation) and $\sf G1$ holds for $T$? In this paper, we show that there are many such theories based on Je\v{r}\'{a}bek's work using some model theory. We prove that for each recursively inseparable pair $\langle A,B\rangle$, we can construct a r.e. theory $U_{\langle A,B\rangle}$ such that $U_{\langle A,B\rangle}$ is weaker than $\mathbf{R}$ w.r.t. interpretation and $\sf G1$ holds for $U_{\langle A,B\rangle}$. As a corollary, we answer a question from Albert Visser. Moreover, we prove that for any Turing degree $\mathbf{0}< \mathbf{d}<\mathbf{0}^{\prime}$, there is a theory $T$ with Turing degree $\mathbf{d}$ such that $\sf G1$ holds for $T$ and $T$ is weaker than $\mathbf{R}$ w.r.t. Turing reducibility. As a corollary, based on Shoenfield's work using some recursion theory, we show that there is no theory with a minimal degree of Turing reducibility for which $\sf G1$ holds.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06658/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06658/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06658