A sufficient condition for a locally compact almost simple group to have open monolith
Colin D. Reid

TL;DR
This paper provides a sufficient condition for a totally disconnected, locally compact group with a topologically simple monolith to have that monolith be open and abstractly simple, advancing understanding of the structure of such groups.
Contribution
It introduces a new criterion that guarantees the openness and simplicity of the monolith in totally disconnected, locally compact groups.
Findings
The monolith is open under the given condition.
The monolith is shown to be abstractly simple.
The paper advances structural understanding of locally compact groups.
Abstract
We obtain a sufficient condition, given a totally disconnected, locally compact group with a topologically simple monolith , to ensure that is open in and abstractly simple.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsadvanced mathematical theories · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
A sufficient condition for a locally compact almost simple group to have open monolith
Colin D. Reid
Abstract
We obtain a sufficient condition, given a totally disconnected, locally compact group with a topologically simple monolith , to ensure that is open in and abstractly simple.
Acknowledgement
The impetus for writing this note was a question of Waltraud Lederle, as well as some questions arising from [1] and from an ongoing project with Alejandra Garrido and David Robertson. I thank Waltraud Lederle and my collaborators for their insightful questions and comments.
We recall some definitions from [1].
Definition**.**
Let be a totally disconnected, locally compact (t.d.l.c.) group. We say is expansive if there is a neighbourhood of the identity in such that . The group is regionally expansive if there is a compactly generated open subgroup of such that is expansive; equivalently, every open subgroup containing is expansive.
A topological group is monolithic if there is a unique smallest nontrivial closed normal subgroup of , called the monolith of . A t.d.l.c. group is robustly monolithic if it is monolithic and the monolith is nondiscrete, regionally expansive, and topologically simple.
Note that every topologically simple t.d.l.c. group is expansive, and hence if is compactly generated, then it is regionally expansive. Thus in the context of topologically simple groups, ‘regionally expansive’ should be considered a generalization of ‘compactly generated’. The definition of ‘robustly monolithic’ allows us to consider a more general situation, where the regionally expansive topologically simple group is embedded as a closed normal subgroup in some larger t.d.l.c. group , such that . It is then natural to ask how complex the quotient can be as a topological group.
Here is a sufficient condition for to be discrete, in other words, for to be open in ; in the situation described, in fact is abstractly simple.
Theorem 1**.**
Let be a robustly monolithic t.d.l.c. group. Suppose that has an open subgroup of the form where and are nontrivial closed subgroups of . Then for every nontrivial subgroup of such that , without assuming that is closed, it follows that is open in and contains . In particular, itself is abstractly simple and open in .
The proof is based on the local structure theory developed in [2], [3] and [1]; we briefly recall the necessary background.
Definition**.**
We define the quasi-centralizer of a subgroup of a topological group to be the set of elements such that commutes with some open subgroup of , and write . We say is [A]-semisimple if , and whenever is an abelian subgroup of with open normalizer, then .
Given an [A]-semisimple t.d.l.c. group , the (globally defined) centralizer lattice of is the set
[TABLE]
equipped with the partial order of inclusion of subsets of . Within , the (globally defined) decomposition lattice consists of those such that is open in .
By [1, Proposition 5.1.2], every robustly monolithic t.d.l.c. group is [A]-semisimple, so the definitions above apply. Note that if is [A]-semisimple, then so is every open subgroup of .
By construction, given , then is closed in and is open in . It is shown in [2] that is a Boolean algebra, on which the map is the complementation map. The centralizer lattice is a local invariant of , in the sense that if is any open subgroup of , then is -equivariantly isomorphic to via the map . The decomposition lattice is a local invariant of in the same manner; in particular, it accounts for all direct factors of open subgroups of . The decomposition lattice has the following additional property:
Given with least upper bound in , and given open subgroups of , then as a subset of , the product is a neighbourhood of the identity.
(To see why holds, note that we can choose compact open subgroups of that normalize each other, so that is a compact subgroup of ; the fact that is an open subgroup of an element of then follows by [2, Theorem 4.5].)
There is a natural action of on by conjugation, which preserves the partial order and hence the Boolean algebra structure; note also that the stabilizers of this action are open. There is then a corresponding continuous action of by homeomorphisms on the Stone space of , which is a compact zero-dimensional Hausdorff space. The latter action has useful dynamical properties. Given a group acting on a topological space , we say the action is minimal if every orbit is dense, and compressible if there is a nonempty open subset such that for every nonempty open subset of , there is such that .
Lemma 2**.**
Let be a robustly monolithic t.d.l.c. group and let be a -invariant subalgebra of . Then the -action on is continuous and the -action is minimal and compressible.
Proof.
The action is continuous because stabilizers of elements of are open. By [1, Theorem 7.3.3], the action of on is minimal and compressible; these properties pass to any quotient -space. ∎
We can now prove the theorem.
Proof of Theorem 1.
As noted above, is [A]-semisimple, and hence the centralizer lattice is a Boolean algebra, with -invariant subalgebra . The condition that has an open subgroup that splits nontrivially as a direct product then amounts to the condition that . Applying Stone duality, the -space admits a -equivariant quotient space with .
Let . By Lemma 2, the action of on is continuous and the action of is minimal and compressible. In particular, acts nontrivially on . Since is topologically simple and the action is continuous, in fact acts faithfully on , so the action of on is also faithful.
Claim: Let be a nontrivial subgroup of , such that is open in and contains (do not assume that is closed). Then is open in and .
We begin the proof of the claim with some reductions. By [1, Lemma 5.1.4], the normalizer is robustly monolithic with monolith . Since is open in , it also has an open subgroup that splits nontrivially as a direct product. Thus we may assume without loss of generality that . Since and are normal, we have . Since , it follows that and have nontrivial intersection; thus we may replace with and assume that is a normal subgroup of . Since is topologically simple, it follows that is dense in . By continuity, we then see that the action of on is minimal and compressible.
Since , is zero-dimensional, and the action is compressible, there is a nonempty clopen subset of and such that is properly contained in . Correspondingly, there is and , such that is a subgroup of that is closed but not open in . It then follows that has an open subgroup of the form where ; in turn, is a nontrivial element of . By [4, Proposition 5.1], we have , where
[TABLE]
By [3, Proposition 6.14], the intersection is open in . Let be the clopen subset of corresponding to . Since is compact and the action of on is minimal, there are such that . By it follows that is open in ; thus is open in . In particular, is closed in ; since is dense in , it follows that . This completes the proof of the claim.
The claim applies in particular when , so is open in . Thus the assumption that is open follows automatically from assuming that contains . We have therefore shown that given a nontrivial subgroup of such that , then is open in and . As this conclusion applies in particular to any nontrivial normal subgroup of , we see that is abstractly simple. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] P.-E. Caprace, C. D. Reid and P. R. Wesolek, Approximating Simple Locally Compact Groups by Their Dense Locally Compact Subgroups. Int. Math. Res. Not. (2019), rny 298, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rny 298
- 2[2] P.-E. Caprace, C. D. Reid and G. A. Willis, Locally normal subgroups of totally disconnected groups; Part I: General theory. Forum Math. Sigma 5 (2017), e 11, 76pp.
- 3[3] P.-E. Caprace, C. D. Reid and G. A. Willis, Locally normal subgroups of totally disconnected groups; Part II: Compactly generated simple groups. Forum Math. Sigma 5 (2017), e 12, 89pp.
- 4[4] P.-E. Caprace, C. D. Reid and G. A. Willis, Limits of contraction groups and the Tits core. J. Lie Theory 24 (2014), 957–967.
