# Comparing proton momentum distributions in $A=2$ and 3 nuclei via $^2$H   $^3$H and $^3$He $(e, e'p)$ measurements

**Authors:** R. Cruz-Torres, S. Li, F. Hauenstein, A. Schmidt, D. Nguyen, D., Abrams, H. Albataineh, S. Alsalmi, D. Androic, K. Aniol, W. Armstrong, J., Arrington, H. Atac, T. Averett, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, X. Bai, J. Bane, S. Barcus,, A. Beck, V. Bellini, H. Bhatt, D. Bhetuwal, D. Biswas, D. Blyth, W. Boeglin,, D. Bulumulla, A. Camsonne, J. Castellanos, J.-P. Chen, E.O. Cohen, S. Covrig,, K. Craycraft, B. Dongwi, M. Duer, B. Duran, D. Dutta, E. Fuchey, C. Gal, T.N., Gautam, S. Gilad, K. Gnanvo, T. Gogami, J. Gomez, C. Gu, A. Habarakada, T., Hague, O. Hansen, M. Hattawy, O. Hen, D.W. Higinbotham, E. Hughes, C. Hyde,, H. Ibrahim, S. Jian, S. Joosten, A. Karki, B. Karki, A.T. Katramatou, C., Keppel, M. Khachatryan, V. Khachatryan, A. Khanal, D. King, P. King, I., Korover, T. Kutz, N. Lashley-Colthirst, G. Laskaris, W. Li, H. Liu, N., Liyanage, D. Lonardoni, R. Machleidt, L.E. Marcucci, P. Markowitz, R.E., McClellan, D. Meekins, S. Mey-Tal Beck, Z.-E. Meziani, R. Michaels, M., Mihovilovic, V. Nelyubin, N. Nuruzzaman, M. Nycz, R. Obrecht, M. Olson, L., Ou, V. Owen, B. Pandey, V. Pandey, A. Papadopoulou, S. Park, M. Patsyuk, S., Paul, G.G. Petratos, E. Piasetzky, R. Pomatsalyuk, S. Premathilake, A.J.R., Puckett, V. Punjabi, R. Ransome, M.N.H. Rashad, P.E. Reimer, S. Riordan, J., Roche, F. Sammarruca, N. Santiesteban, B. Sawatzky, E.P. Segarra, B., Schmookler, A. Shahinyan, S. \v{S}irch, N. Sparveris, T. Su, R. Suleiman, H., Szumila-Vance, A.S. Tadepalli, L. Tang, W. Tireman, F. Tortorici, G., Urciuoli, M. Viviani, L.B. Weinstein, B. Wojtsekhowski, S. Wood, Z.H. Ye,, Z.Y. Ye, J. Zhang

arXiv: 1902.06358 · 2019-09-25

## TL;DR

This study measures and compares proton momentum distributions in $A=2$ and 3 nuclei using electron scattering, revealing discrepancies at high momenta that could inform short-range nuclear force models.

## Contribution

First measurement of $(e,e'p)$ cross-section ratios for $^3$He, $^3$H, and deuterium across a wide momentum range, providing new insights into nuclear interactions at short distances.

## Key findings

- Ratios extend above Fermi momentum, showing differences up to 50%.
- $^3$He/$^3$H ratios agree within 3% at lower momenta.
- Discrepancies at high momenta suggest sensitivity to short-range NN interactions.

## Abstract

We report the first measurement of the $(e,e'p)$ reaction cross-section ratios for Helium-3 ($^3$He), Tritium ($^3$H), and Deuterium ($d$). The measurement covered a missing momentum range of $40 \le p_{miss} \le 550$ MeV$/c$, at large momentum transfer ($\langle Q^2 \rangle \approx 1.9$ (GeV$/c$)$^2$) and $x_B>1$, which minimized contributions from non quasi-elastic (QE) reaction mechanisms. The data is compared with plane-wave impulse approximation (PWIA) calculations using realistic spectral functions and momentum distributions. The measured and PWIA-calculated cross-section ratios for $^3$He$/d$ and $^3$H$/d$ extend to just above the typical nucleon Fermi-momentum ($k_F \approx 250$ MeV$/c$) and differ from each other by $\sim 20\%$, while for $^3$He/$^3$H they agree within the measurement accuracy of about 3\%. At momenta above $k_F$, the measured $^3$He/$^3$H ratios differ from the calculation by $20\% - 50\%$. Final state interaction (FSI) calculations using the generalized Eikonal Approximation indicate that FSI should change the $^3$He/$^3$H cross-section ratio for this measurement by less than 5\%. If these calculations are correct, then the differences at large missing momenta between the $^3$He/$^3$H experimental and calculated ratios could be due to the underlying $NN$ interaction, and thus could provide new constraints on the previously loosely-constrained short-distance parts of the $NN$ interaction.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06358/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06358/full.md

## References

78 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06358/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06358