# Group Testing: An Information Theory Perspective

**Authors:** Matthew Aldridge, Oliver Johnson, Jonathan Scarlett

arXiv: 1902.06002 · 2026-05-15

## TL;DR

This paper surveys recent information-theoretic advances in group testing, analyzing algorithms, bounds, and variations to optimize the identification of defective items efficiently.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of theoretical bounds, optimal rates, and algorithmic developments in noiseless and noisy group testing scenarios.

## Key findings

- Achievability bounds for optimal decoding methods
- Optimal rates for noiseless group testing
- Survey of algorithms in noisy settings

## Abstract

The group testing problem concerns discovering a small number of defective items within a large population by performing tests on pools of items. A test is positive if the pool contains at least one defective, and negative if it contains no defectives. This is a sparse inference problem with a combinatorial flavour, with applications in medical testing, biology, telecommunications, information technology, data science, and more. In this monograph, we survey recent developments in the group testing problem from an information-theoretic perspective. We cover several related developments: efficient algorithms with practical storage and computation requirements, achievability bounds for optimal decoding methods, and algorithm-independent converse bounds. We assess the theoretical guarantees not only in terms of scaling laws, but also in terms of the constant factors, leading to the notion of the {\em rate} of group testing, indicating the amount of information learned per test. For the noiseless setting, we present a series of results leading to optimal rates, which in turn imply optimality and suboptimality results of various algorithms depending on the sparsity regime. We also survey analogous developments in noisy settings. In addition, we survey results concerning a number of variations on the standard group testing problem, including approximate recovery criteria, adaptive algorithms with a limited number of stages, sublinear-time algorithms, and settings with additional prior information, among others.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06002/full.md

## Figures

25 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06002/full.md

## References

204 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06002/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.06002