On the fundamental group of complete manifolds with almost Euclidean volume growth
Jianming Wan

TL;DR
This paper proves that complete Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature and specific volume growth conditions have trivial or finite fundamental groups, advancing understanding of their topological structure.
Contribution
It establishes new results linking volume growth conditions to the finiteness or triviality of the fundamental group in manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature.
Findings
Fundamental group is trivial under certain conditions.
Fundamental group is finite with specific volume growth.
Provides new insights into topology of manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature.
Abstract
It is proved that the fundamental group of a complete Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature and certain volume growth conditions is trivial or finite.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Geometry and complex manifolds
On the fundamental group of complete manifolds with almost Euclidean volume growth
and
Jianming Wan
School of Mathematics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
Abstract.
It is proved that the fundamental group of a complete Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature and certain volume growth conditions is trivial or finite.
Key words and phrases:
nonnegative Ricci curvature, volume growth, fundamental group
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
53C20
1. Introduction
Throughout the paper denotes a complete noncompact Riemannian -manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature. Let be the volume of the metric ball origin at with radius in . By Bishop-Gromov volume comparison , is a decreasing function, where is the volume of unit ball in . So the limit is existent as goes to infinite. Denote the volume growth of by
[TABLE]
The is independent of and so a global geometric invariant. Moreover, the volume comparison also implies that and if and only if is isometric to . We say that has Euclidean volume growth (or large volume growth) if .
The volume comparison theorem implies that
[TABLE]
for all and Euclidean volume growth condition implies that
[TABLE]
The main result of this note is
Theorem 1.1**.**
*Given , there is a constant such that if an open - manifold satisfies
1)*
[TABLE]
*for some and all , then is simple connected.
2)*
[TABLE]
for some , then the fundamental group is finite.
We should note that even though has Euclidean volume growth, one can not deduce that is simple connected. So formula (1.1) holding for all is important.
Set . We see immediately that 2) of Theorem 1.1 implies the following
Corollary 1.2**.**
Given , there is a constant such that if an open - manifold satisfies
[TABLE]
for some , , then is finite.
This shows a gap phenomenon for a well-known result of Peter Li [3] and Anderson [1] states that is finite provided has Euclidean volume growth.
On the other hand, Anderson has proved that (see Theorem 1.1 in [1]) under condition (1.3), every finitely generated subgroup of is actually of polynomial growth of order . In [6] Bingye Wu proved that under condition (1.3) is finitely generated. But every infinite group of finitely generated has polynomial growth of order at least 1 (I thank the referee for pointing out this fact. See Section 3). So Corollary 1.2 is also a consequence of Anderson and Wu’s results.
Acknowledgment: I would like to thank the referee for his (her) invaluable suggestions. The referee’s explanation clarify some understanding of mine on Anderson’s paper [1].
2. A related volume ratio
In this section we prove an estimate on the volume ratio related to certain generated elements of (Lemma 2.4 below). The main ingredients are Sormani’s uniform cut lemma [5] and some ideas due to Shen [4].
2.1. A uniform estimate
Let and be the universal cover. Following [5], we say that is a minimal representative geodesic loop (based at p) of if , where is a minimal geodesic connecting and . So .
Given a group , we say that is an ordered set of independent generators of if every can not be expressed as the previous generators and their inverses, .
In [5] Sormani proved the following two lemmas.
Lemma 2.1**.**
(halfway lemma) There exists an ordered set of independent generators of with minimal representative geodesic loops of length such that
[TABLE]
In particular, we have a sequence of such generators if is infinitely generated.
Lemma 2.2**.**
(uniform cut lemma) Let () be a complete manifold with . Let be a noncontractible geodesic loop based at of length such that
- (1)
If based at is a loop homotopic to , then ; 2. (2)
The is minimal on and .
Then there is a constant depending on such that if where , then
[TABLE]
The main idea of proof of uniform cut lemma is to lift geodesic loop to the universal covering space and research carefully the related excess function. It contains a nice application of Abresch-Gromoll’s estimate on excess function [2]. The above two lemmas allow her to show that Milnor conjecture holds for the manifold with so called small linear diameter growth.
Let be a minimal representative geodesic loops based at of satisfying Lemma 2.1. The below estimate is important for our purpose.
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let be a geodesic issuing from such that is minimal on . Then there is a constant such that
[TABLE]
Proof.
We set and By Lemma 2.2, we have
[TABLE]
where is a universal constant,
Suppose that . By the triangle inequality one has
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
We also note that So similarly one has
[TABLE]
It follows that
[TABLE]
∎
2.2. A volume’s ratio
Continuing with notations in Lemma 2.3, we shall prove
Lemma 2.4**.**
We have the following ratio of volume
[TABLE]
Before giving the proof of Lemma 2.4, (following [4]) we introduce some necessary notations. Let be a close subset of unit tangent sphere . Let be the set of points such that there exists a minimal geodesic from to with . We write for the volume of .
We denote by the set of unit vectors such that is minimal on .
Proof.
of Lemma 2.4. We write . Since , we have By the definition of , this gives i.e.
[TABLE]
Claim 1:
[TABLE]
By the Bishop-Gromov comparison theorem, for . By Lemma 2.3 we have . So
[TABLE]
Since , we have . Thus we obtain (2.2).
Claim 2:
[TABLE]
Following the observation of Shen (c.f. [4] Lemma 2.4), we see that
[TABLE]
Then we have
[TABLE]
The second in equality follows from the generalized volume comparison (Lemma 2.2 of [4]). Thus
[TABLE]
Jointing formulas (2.1), (2.2) and (2.3), we establish the lemma. ∎
3. A proof of theorem 1.1
We set
[TABLE]
If for all , then there is no nontrivial generator satisfying Lemma 2.4. So is simple connected. Thus the first part of Theorem 1.1 is proved.
The proof of second part of Theorem 1.1 is divided into two steps.
Firstly, is finitely generated. We argue by contradiction. Assume is infinitely generated, then by Lemma 2.2, there is a sequence , as satisfying Lemma 2.4, i.e.
[TABLE]
for all . This contradicts to condition (1.2).
Secondly, condition (1.2) implies that for some and sufficiently large . So by Anderson’s result [1], has polynomial growth of order .
The form of allows us to write . By condition (1.2), there exists , for all , one has
[TABLE]
So
[TABLE]
. For any , we can assume for some . Then
[TABLE]
It follows that for all .
An algebraic fact: If is an infinite group with generators , then for all , where is the set of elements with word length with respect to . In particular, has polynomial growth of order at least 1. (This proof is provided by referee) To see this we argue by contradiction. Let be the smallest integer so that , then . This shows . In other words, any word of length can be expressed as a word of length . It follows that , which is finite, a contradiction.
The second part of Theorem 1.1 follows from above immediately.
Remark 3.1*.*
Our proof of finite generation of is much different to Wu’s arguments under condition (1.3). Wu’s proof was based on the estimate of ordered set of independent generators with minimal representative geodesic loops.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Anderson, M.T. On the topology of complete manifolds of nonnegative Ricci curvature. Topology 29 (1990), no. 1, 41-55.
- 2[2] Abresch, U. and Gromoll, D. On complete manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990), no. 2, 355-374.
- 3[3] Li, Peter Large time behavior of the heat equation on complete manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature. Ann. of Math. (2) 124 (1986), no. 1, 1-21.
- 4[4] Shen, Zhongmin Complete manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature and large volume growth. Invent. Math. 125 (1996), no. 3, 393-404.
- 5[5] Sormani, Christina Nonnegative Ricci curvature, small linear diameter growth and finite generation of fundamental groups. J. Differential Geom. 54 (2000), no. 3, 547-559.
- 6[6] Wu, Bing Ye On the fundamental group of Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature. Geom. Dedicata 162 (2013), 337-344.
