New coordinates for a simpler canonical derivation of the Hawking effect

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new coordinate system enabling a straightforward Hamiltonian-based derivation of the Hawking effect, overcoming previous challenges related to spacetime foliation and matter Hamiltonian formulation.

Contribution

The authors propose novel coordinates that facilitate an exact canonical derivation of Hawking radiation without involving matter diffeomorphism generators.

Findings

New coordinates enable canonical derivation of Hawking effect

Avoids issues with non-spacelike hypersurfaces and matter Hamiltonian

Simplifies the Hamiltonian approach to black hole radiation

Abstract

In order to achieve a Hamiltonian-based canonical derivation of the Hawking effect, one usually faces multiple hurdles. Firstly, the spacetime foliation using Schwarzschild time does not lead to hyper-surfaces which are always spacelike. Secondly, the null coordinates which are frequently used in covariant approach, do not lead to a true matter Hamiltonian. Recently, an exact canonical derivation was presented using the so-called near-null coordinates. However, there too one faces the difficulty of having to deal with non-vanishing matter diffeomorphism generator as the spatial decomposition involves a non-zero shift vector. Here we introduce a new set of coordinates which allows one to perform an exact canonical derivation of Hawking effect without having to deal with matter diffeomorphism generator.

Figures

Equations

$$d{s}^2=-f(r)d{t}^2+f(r{)}^{-1}d{r}^2+r^{2}d{\theta }^2+r^2{\sin }^2\theta d{\varphi }^2,$$

$$d{s}^2=g_{\mu \nu }d{x}^{\mu }d{x}^{\nu }=-f(r)d{t}^2+f(r{)}^{-1}d{r}^2.$$

$$S_{\Phi }=\int d^{2}x\left[-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}{g}^{\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\mu }\Phi (x){\partial }_{\nu }\Phi (x)\right].$$

$$r_{\star }=r+r_s\ln \left(r/r_s-1\right).$$

$$d{s}^2=f(r)\left[-d{t}^2+d{r}_{\star }^2\right],$$

$$v=t+r_{\star };u=t-r_{\star }.$$

$${\tau }_{-}=t-(1-ϵ)r_{\star };{\xi }_{-}=-t-(1+ϵ)r_{\star },$$

$${\tau }_{+}=t+(1-ϵ)r_{\star };{\xi }_{+}=-t+(1+ϵ)r_{\star },$$

$$d{s}^2=\frac{f(r)}{4}\left[-\alpha d{\tau }_{\pm }^2+\beta d{\tau }_{\pm }d{\xi }_{\pm }+\gamma d{\xi }_{\pm }^2\right],$$

$$d{s}^2=\frac{f(r)}{4}\left[-\alpha d{\tau }_{\pm }^2+\gamma d{\xi }_{\pm }^2\right]\equiv g_{\mu \nu }^{\pm }d{x}^{\mu }d{x}^{\nu },$$

$${d{\xi }_{-}}_{|{\tau }_{-}}=-2d{r_{\star }}_{|{\tau }_{-}},{d{\xi }_{+}}_{|{\tau }_{+}}=2d{r_{\star }}_{|{\tau }_{+}}.$$

$${\Gamma }_{tr}^t={\Gamma }_{rt}^t=-{\Gamma }_{rr}^r=\frac{f^{\prime }(r)}{2f(r)};{\Gamma }_{tt}^r=\frac{1}{2}f(r)f^{\prime }(r).$$

$$\frac{d}{d\sigma }\left(f(r)\frac{dt}{d\sigma }\right)=0,\frac{d^{2}r}{d{\sigma }^2}=0.$$

$$r=C\sigma +D,$$

$$({\xi }_{-}-{\xi }_{-}^0{)}_{|{\tau }_{-}}=2(r^0-r{)}_{|{\tau }_{-}},$$

$$({\xi }_{+}-{\xi }_{+}^0){}_{|{\tau }_{+}}=2(r-r^0{)}_{|{\tau }_{+}}+2r_s\ln {\left(1+\frac{r-r^0}{r^0-r_s}\right)}_{|{\tau }_{+}}.$$

$$(r-r^0{)}_{|{\tau }_{+}}=C^{\prime }(r^0-r{)}_{|{\tau }_{-}},$$

$${\xi }_{+}={\xi }_{-}+2r_s\ln \left(\frac{{\xi }_{-}}{2r_s}\right).$$

$${\xi }_{-}\approx 2r_s{e}^{{\xi }_{+}/2r_s}.$$

$$S_{\phi }=\int d{\tau }_{\pm }d{\xi }_{\pm }\left[-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g^0}{g}^{0\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\mu }\phi {\partial }_{\nu }\phi \right],$$

$$H_{\phi }^{\pm }=\int d{\xi }_{\pm }N\left[\frac{{\Pi }^2}{2\sqrt{q}}+\frac{\sqrt{q}}{2}({\partial }_{{\xi }_{\pm }}\phi {)}^2\right],$$

$$\{\phi ({\tau }_{\pm },{\xi }_{\pm }),\Pi ({\tau }_{\pm },{\xi }_{\pm }^{\prime })\}=\delta ({\xi }_{\pm }-{\xi }_{\pm }^{\prime }).$$

$$\Pi ({\tau }_{\pm },{\xi }_{\pm })=\frac{\sqrt{q}}{N}({\partial }_{{\tau }_{\pm }}\phi ).$$

$$V_{\pm }={\int }_{{\xi }_{\pm }^L}^{{\xi }_{\pm }^R}d{\xi }_{\pm }\sqrt{q}={\xi }_{\pm }^R-{\xi }_{\pm }^L\equiv L_{\pm },$$

$$\phi ({\tau }_{\pm },{\xi }_{\pm })$$

$$\Pi ({\tau }_{\pm },{\xi }_{\pm })$$

$$\int d{\xi }_{\pm }\sqrt{q}{e}^{i(k-k^{\prime }){\xi }_{\pm }}=V_{\pm }{\delta }_{k,k^{\prime }},$$

$$\sum _k{e}^{ik({\xi }_{\pm }-{\xi }_{\pm }^{\prime })}=V_{\pm }\delta ({\xi }_{\pm }-{\xi }_{\pm }^{\prime })/\sqrt{q}.$$

$${\mathcal{H}}_k^{\pm }=\frac{1}{2}{\tilde{\pi }}_k^{\pm }{\tilde{\pi }}_{-k}^{\pm }+\frac{1}{2}|k{|}^2{\tilde{\varphi }}_k^{\pm }{\tilde{\varphi }}_{-k}^{\pm }.$$

$$\{{\tilde{\varphi }}_k^{\pm },{\tilde{\pi }}_{-k^{\prime }}^{\pm }\}={\delta }_{k,k^{\prime }}.$$

$$\Pi ({\tau }_{+},{\xi }_{+})=(\partial {\xi }_{-}/\partial {\xi }_{+})\Pi ({\tau }_{-},{\xi }_{-}).$$

Full text

I Introduction

An asymptotic future observer perceives thermal emission in a black hole spacetime when one considers quantum fields in such classical geometry. This phenomenon is known as the Hawking effect Hawking (1975). Usually, a very large number of microstates are needed to understand thermal emission from a body. However, a classical black hole can be described by only few parameters in Einstein’s general theory of relativity Carroll (2004); Schutz (1985); Fulling (1989); Wald (1984). So one expects that the study of Hawking effect in principle might allow one to understand the possible, yet unknown, quantum theory of gravity and significant efforts have been made to understand the Hawking effect in many different ways Singh and Chakraborty (2014); Dray and ’t Hooft (1985); Kawai et al. (2013); Parker and Toms (2009); Singleton and Wilburn (2011); Bhattacharya and Lahiri (2013); Singh et al. (2013); Lapedes (1978); Ho (2015); Jacobson (2013); Giddings and Nelson (1992); Lambert (Modave, 2013); Fredenhagen and Haag (1990); Jacobson (2003); Kiefer (2002); Traschen (1999); Chakraborty et al. (2015); Chakraborty and Lochan (2017); Carlip (2014); DeWitt (1975); Ford (1997); Hollands and Wald (2015); Padmanabhan (2010); Fulling and Ruijsenaars (1987); Hinton (1983); Parikh and Wilczek (2000); Visser (2003); Davies (1975); Wald (1975).

In the canonical approaches to quantum gravity, one decomposes the spacetime into spatial hyper-surfaces labeled by a suitable time parameter. Consequently, in order to explore the techniques that are often employed in such canonical quantization framework, it is desirable to have a Hamiltonian-based canonical derivation of the Hawking effect. In such an approach, however one faces multiple hurdles. Firstly, the hyper-surfaces for fixed Schwarzschild time are not always spacelike Melnikov and Weinstein (2001, 2004); Weinstein (2002) and consequently Hamiltonian dynamics is not well-posed in such coordinates. Secondly, in the standard derivation of the Hawking effect one needs to find the relation between the ingoing and outgoing massless field modes as seen by two asymptotic observers at the past and the future null infinity respectively Hawking (1975). These field modes follow null trajectory and are conveniently described using null coordinates. However, null coordinates do not lead to a true matter Hamiltonian that can describe the dynamics of these modes.

In order to overcome these difficulties, recently a set of near-null coordinates is introduced in Barman et al. (2018) which allows one to perform an exact canonical derivation of the Hawking effect. Firstly, these near-null coordinates lead to a non-trivial matter Hamiltonian which describes the dynamics of the field modes. Secondly, these coordinates being structurally closer to the null coordinates, allow one to follow similar methods which are employed for null coordinates. Nevertheless, the usage of these near-null coordinates leads to the off-diagonal terms in the spacetime metric. The corresponding spacetime decomposition involves both the lapse function as well as a non-vanishing shift vector. Consequently, the dynamics of field modes depends not just on matter Hamiltonian but also on the matter diffeomorphism generator.

This article is organized as follows. In the section II, we review the key aspects of a Schwarzschild black hole spacetime. Then we discuss the difficulties that one faces while using Schwarzschild time for space-time foliation. Subsequently, we introduce a new set of coordinates which allows an exact canonical derivation of the Hawking effect. The spacetime decomposition into spatial hyper-surfaces using these coordinates does not involve any shift vector. Therefore, the usage of these coordinates leads to a much simpler Hamiltonian-based derivation of the Hawking effect.

II Schwarzschild spacetime

Let us consider a Schwarzschild spacetime which is formed at some finite past, possibly due to the collapse of a matter shell whose exact dynamics however is not important for understanding the Hawking effect. The invariant distance element in the Schwarzschild spacetime is given by

[TABLE]

where $f(r)=\left(1-r_{s}/r\right)$ and $r_{s}=2GM$ is the Schwarzschild radius. Throughout the paper, we use natural units where $c=\hbar=1$. It is well-known that the Hawking effect is ultimately connected with the structure of the Schwarzschild metric in the $t-r$ plane. Therefore, for simplicity now onward we consider $1+1$ dimensional Schwarzschild spacetime with the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$ along with the invariant distance

[TABLE]

In order to represent the Hawking quanta, here we consider a minimally coupled massless scalar field $\Phi(x)$ whose dynamics is governed by the action

[TABLE]

We shall ignore the back-reaction of this scalar field on the spacetime metric as done also in the standard derivation of the Hawking effect Hawking (1975).

III Canonical formulation

It turns out that the Schwarzchild time $t$ is not a good choice of time parameter for canonical formulation as the hyper-surfaces with a fixed Schwarzschild time $t$ are not always spacelike. We may easily see it from the expression $ds^{2}_{|dt=0}=f(r)^{-1}dr^{2}$ where hyper-surfaces for fixed Schwarzschild time are spacelike when $r>r_{s}$ and timelike when $r<r_{s}$ Melnikov and Weinstein (2001, 2004); Weinstein (2002). In order to consider the spatial region only outside the horizon, usually one defines the so-called tortoise coordinate $r_{\star}$ such that $dr_{\star}=f(r)^{-1}dr$. By choosing suitable constant of integration, $r_{\star}$ can be expressed as

[TABLE]

The domain of $r_{\star}$ being $(-\infty,\infty)$, it covers only a part of the full Schwarzschild spacetime and the corresponding metric becomes

[TABLE]

which differs from 1+1 dimensional Minkowski metric by a conformal transformation.

III.1 Null coordinates

In the standard derivation Hawking (1975), the Hawking effect is realized by computing the Bogoliubov transformation coefficients between the ingoing field modes that originate from the past null infinity ($\mathscr{I}^{-}$) and the outgoing field modes that arrive at the future null infinity ($\mathscr{I}^{+}$) respectively. For massless scalar field, these field modes follow null trajectories and are conveniently described using ingoing and outgoing null coordinates, defined as

[TABLE]

Subsequently, using these Bogoliubov coefficients, one computes the expectation value of number density operator corresponding to an observer near future null infinity in the vacuum state corresponding to an observer near past null infinity. This expectation value turns out to be the same as the blackbody spectrum at the Hawking temperature. Therefore, these null coordinates play key roles even in the basic formulation of the Hawking effect in the covariant approach. However, these null coordinates do not lead to a true Hamiltonian for the matter field (3) that can describe the field dynamics. Consequently, these null coordinates are not suitable for performing a Hamiltonian-based canonical derivation of the Hawking effect.

III.2 Timelike and spacelike coordinates

In order to perform an exact canonical derivation of the Hawking effect, a set of near-null coordinates is introduced in Ref. Barman et al. (2018). In particular, a timelike coordinate $\tau_{-}$ and a spacelike coordinate $\xi_{-}$ used by an observer near the past null infinity $\mathscr{I}^{-}$, referred to as the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$, are given by

[TABLE]

where the parameter $\epsilon$ is taken to be small and positive such that $\epsilon\ll 1$ which signifies the naming of these coordinates as ‘near-null’. Similarly, one introduces another set of timelike coordinate $\tau_{+}$ and spacelike coordinate $\xi_{+}$ for an observer near the future null infinity $\mathscr{I}^{+}$. These coordinates are given by

[TABLE]

and the corresponding observer is referred to as the observer $\mathbb{O}^{+}$. We note that the domain of the coordinates $\tau_{\pm}$ and $\xi_{\pm}$ both are $(-\infty,\infty)$.

III.2.1 Domain of the parameter $\epsilon$

The main motivation for choosing the parameter $\epsilon$ to be very small in Ref. Barman et al. (2018) was to keep these coordinates structurally ‘near’ to the null coordinates so that one could employ similar methods as used for null coordinates. However, in general, any value of the parameter $\epsilon$ in the domain $0<\epsilon<2$ allows one to maintain the timelike and spacelike characteristics of the coordinates $\tau_{\pm}$ and $\xi_{\pm}$ respectively. Therefore, these coordinates can, in principle, be used for the study of the Hawking effect using canonical formulation in the entire allowed domain of $\epsilon$ which is not necessarily small. However, such coordinates would then loose their ‘near-null’ characteristics. We note that for both the observers $\mathbb{O}^{+}$ and $\mathbb{O}^{-}$, the $1+1$ dimensional Schwarzschild metric (5) can be expressed as

[TABLE]

where $\alpha=(2\epsilon+\epsilon^{2})$, $\beta=2(2-\epsilon^{2})$ and $\gamma=(2\epsilon-\epsilon^{2})$. For the small values of the parameter $\epsilon$ i.e. $\epsilon\ll 1$, the parameter $\beta$ is non-vanishing. Therefore, if one foliates the spacetime into spatial hyper-surfaces by using the time variables $\tau_{\pm}$, the presence of the off-diagonal terms in the metric leads to non-vanishing shift vector. This in turns forces one to deal with the non-vanishing matter diffeomorphism generator Barman et al. (2018).

III.2.2 Parameter $\epsilon=\sqrt{2}$

However, one may notice that the off-diagonal terms in the metric (9) vanishes identically for both observers if one chooses $\epsilon=\sqrt{2}$ which implies $\beta=0$. Then the corresponding metric becomes

[TABLE]

where $\alpha=2(\sqrt{2}+1)$ and $\gamma=2(\sqrt{2}-1)$. Clearly, if we use $\tau_{\pm}$ as time parameters with $\epsilon=\sqrt{2}$, then the foliation of the spacetime into spatial hyper-surfaces does not involve any shift vector.

III.2.3 Relation between spatial coordinates $\xi_{-}$ and $\xi_{+}$

In order to perform the canonical derivation of the Hawking effect, a key task is to find the relation between the spatial coordinates $\xi_{-}$ and $\xi_{+}$ which are used by the two asymptotic observers. Firstly, from the equations (7, 8), we note that

[TABLE]

However, we may emphasize here that there was no black hole when the ingoing modes relevant for Hawking effect left the $\mathscr{I}^{-}$ as seen by the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$. So one should view the coordinates ($\tau_{-},\xi_{-}$) subject to the condition $r_{s}\rightarrow 0$ which implies $f(r)\rightarrow 1$ and $r_{\star}\rightarrow r$. Now, using the metric (2), one can calculate the non-vanishing Christoffel symbols given by

[TABLE]

By introducing an affine parameter $\sigma$ along the null trajectories which are defined by $ds^{2}=0$, the geodesic equations can be expressed as

[TABLE]

The Eqns. (13) admit solutions for $r$ as

[TABLE]

where $C,D$ are constants of integration. Given affine transformations are of the form $\sigma\to\sigma^{\prime}=C\sigma+D$, the coordinate $r$ can also be viewed as an affine parameter. We have mentioned that for the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$, one should view the coordinates ($\tau_{-},\xi_{-}$) subject to the condition $r_{s}\rightarrow 0$. Now if we consider a pivotal point $\xi^{0}_{-}$ on a constant $\tau_{-}$ hyper-surface with $r^{0}$ being the corresponding value of the radial coordinate then the Eqn. (11) implies

[TABLE]

where $(\xi_{-}-\xi^{0}_{-})_{|\tau_{-}}$ to be viewed as the spatial separation between any two ingoing null rays which were at the locations $\xi_{-}$ and $\xi^{0}_{-}$ respectively on the spatial hyper-surfaces labelled by the time parameter $\tau_{-}$.

On the other hand, when the relevant outgoing modes for Hawking radiation arrive at $\mathscr{I}^{+}$, as seen by the observer $\mathbb{O}^{+}$, the black hole has already been formed. So if we consider a pivotal point $\xi^{0}_{+}$ on a constant $\tau_{+}$ hyper-surface then using the Eqns. (4) and (11) one can express the spatial separation between two given outgoing null rays along the hyper-surface as

[TABLE]

We have already shown that the coordinate $r$ along both ingoing and outgoing null trajectories can be considered as affine parameter. Therefore, using geometric optics approximation we can relate the spatial separations of the ingoing and the outgoing modes as

[TABLE]

where $C^{\prime}$ is some constant. Given this constant $C^{\prime}$ does not affect the final result, then for simplicity we set this value to be unity. By choosing $\xi_{-}^{0}=2(r^{0}-r_{s})_{|\tau_{+}}$ and $\xi_{+}^{0}=\xi_{-}^{0}+2r_{s}\ln\left(\xi_{-}^{0}/2r_{s}\right)$ in the Eqn. (16), we can express it as

[TABLE]

In the domain where $|\xi_{-}|<<2r_{s}$, we may approximate the relation (18) between spatial coordinates $\xi_{-}$ and $\xi_{+}$ as used by two asymptotic observers $\mathbb{O}^{-}$ and $\mathbb{O}^{+}$ respectively, as

[TABLE]

The relation (19) is the key relation which ultimately leads to the Hawking effect.

III.2.4 Scalar matter field

We note that by using a conformally transformed spacetime metric $g^{0}_{\mu\nu}$ such that $g^{\pm}_{\mu\nu}=\tfrac{1}{4}\gamma f(r)~{}g^{0}_{\mu\nu}$, the scalar field action (3) for both the observers can be written in the form

[TABLE]

where the metric $g^{0}_{\mu\nu}$ is flat and consequently we can use the standard techniques of Fock quantization for the matter field. Using the time coordinates $\tau_{\pm}$, we can compute the scalar matter Hamiltonian as

[TABLE]

where the lapse function $N=\sqrt{\alpha/\gamma}=(\sqrt{2}+1)$ and the determinant of the spatial metric $q=1$. The Poisson bracket between the field $\varphi$ and its conjugate momentum $\Pi$ for both the observers can be expressed as

[TABLE]

Using the equations of motion, the field momentum $\Pi$ can be expressed as

[TABLE]

III.2.5 Fourier modes

The spatial volume $V_{\pm}=\int d\xi_{\pm}\sqrt{q}$ is formally divergent. Therefore, to avoid dealing with explicitly divergent quantity, we choose a fiducial box with finite volume as

[TABLE]

where ${\xi_{\pm}^{L}}$ and ${\xi_{\pm}^{R}}$ are left and right coordinate edges associated with the box. We may now define the Fourier modes for the scalar field as Hossain et al. (2010)

[TABLE]

where complex-valued Fourier modes $\tilde{\phi}^{\pm}_{k}$ and $\tilde{\pi}^{\pm}_{k}$ are subject to the reality condition as we are considering the scalar field $\varphi$ to be a real-valued field. One may check that the Kronecker delta and the Dirac delta can now be expressed as

[TABLE]

The Eqns. (26) and (27) together allow the values of the wave-vector to be $k\in\{k_{l}~{}|k_{l}=2\pi l/L_{\pm}\}$ with $l$ being a non-zero integer. Using Fourier modes, the scalar field Hamiltonian (21) for both the observers can be expressed as $H^{\pm}_{\varphi}=\sum_{k}N\mathcal{H}_{k}^{\pm}$ where the Hamiltonian density for the $k^{th}$ mode is

[TABLE]

The Poisson bracket between the Fourier modes and their conjugate momenta can be expressed as

[TABLE]

III.2.6 Relation between Fourier modes

In order to establish the relation between the Fourier modes of two asymptotic observers, firstly we note that the matter field being scalar, it can be expressed in general as $\varphi(\tau_{-}(\tau_{+},\xi_{+}),\xi_{-}(\tau_{+},\xi_{+}))=\varphi(\tau_{+},\xi_{+})$. Further, in the standard formulation of the Hawking effect, the observer near the $\mathscr{I}^{-}$, deals with the ingoing field modes for them $v=t+r_{\star}=(\tau_{-}-(\sqrt{2}-1)\xi_{-})/\sqrt{2}$ is constant. On the other hand, the observer near $\mathscr{I}^{+}$ deals with the outgoing field modes for them $u=t-r_{\star}=(\tau_{+}-(\sqrt{2}-1)\xi_{+})/\sqrt{2}$ is constant. This aspect allows one to get a relation between the field momenta Barman et al. (2018) as

[TABLE]

The Fourier modes and the conjugate momenta on a given hyper-surface labeled by $\tau_{+}^{0}$, as seen by the observer $\mathbb{O}^{+}$, can be expressed using the modes corresponding to the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$, on a given hyper-surface labeled by $\tau_{-}^{0}$, as

[TABLE]

where the coefficient functions $F_{m}(k,\kappa)$ are given by

[TABLE]

with $m=0,1$. The coefficient functions $F_{m}(k,\kappa)$ play the similar role as the Bogoliubov coefficients. Using the expression (32), it can be shown that $F_{0}(k,\kappa)$ and $F_{1}(k,\kappa)$ are related as Barman and Hossain (2018)

[TABLE]

The coefficient function $F_{0}(k,\kappa)$ is formally divergent as the integrand is purely oscillatory. However, it can be evaluated by introducing a suitable regulator $\delta$ such that $\lim_{\delta\to 0}F_{0}^{\delta}(\pm|k|,\kappa)=F_{0}(\pm|k|,\kappa)$ and the regulated coefficient function can be evaluated as Hossain and Sardar (2016a); Barman et al. (2018)

[TABLE]

where $\Gamma(\beta+1)$ is the Gamma function and $\beta=(2i\kappa r_{s}+\delta-1)$. From the Eqn. (34), one can deduce an important relation as follows

[TABLE]

III.2.7 Number density of Hawking quanta

Using the Eqns. (30), (31), (33) and (35) one can express the Hamiltonian density (28) corresponding to the positive frequency modes i.e. $\kappa>0$ for the observer $\mathbb{O}^{+}$ in terms of the Fourier modes of the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$ as Barman et al. (2018)

[TABLE]

where $\mathrm{\varkappa}=1/(2r_{s})$ is the surface gravity at the Schwarzschild event horizon and $\zeta(1+2\delta)=\sum_{l=1}^{\infty}l^{-(1+2\delta)}$ is the Riemann zeta function. The term $h_{\kappa}^{1}=\sum_{k\neq k^{\prime}}[\frac{1}{2}F_{1}(k,-\kappa)F_{1}(-k^{\prime},\kappa)~{}\tilde{\pi}^{-}_{k}\tilde{\pi}^{-}_{-k^{\prime}}+\frac{1}{2}|\kappa|^{2}F_{0}(k,-\kappa)F_{0}(-k^{\prime},\kappa)~{}\tilde{\phi}^{-}_{k}\tilde{\phi}^{-}_{-k^{\prime}}]$ being linear in Fourier modes and their conjugate momenta, would drop out from the vacuum expectation value. It is well known that the Fourier modes corresponding to a massless free scalar field can be viewed as a system of decoupled harmonic oscillators which can also be seen from the Eqn. (28). Therefore, in Fock quantization $\langle\hat{\mathcal{H}}_{k}^{-}\rangle\equiv\langle 0_{-}|\hat{\mathcal{H}}_{k}^{-}|0_{-}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}|k|$ where the state $|0_{-}\rangle$ refers to the vacuum state of the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$. Consequently, the expectation value of the number density operator $\hat{N}^{+}_{\kappa}\equiv\hat{\mathcal{H}}_{\kappa}^{+}/\kappa-\frac{1}{2}$ corresponding to the observer $\mathbb{O}^{+}$, in the vacuum state of the observer $\mathbb{O}^{-}$ can be evaluated as

[TABLE]

The Eqn. (37) corresponds to a thermal spectrum of bosons at the temperature $T_{H}=\mathrm{\varkappa}/(2\pi k_{B})=1/(4\pi r_{s}k_{B})$. This phenomenon is referred to as the Hawking effect and associated temperature is known as the Hawking temperature.

IV Discussions

In this article we have presented an exact analytical derivation of the Hawking effect in canonical formulation where one does not need to deal with the matter diffeomorphism generator. In order to achieve this simplification, we have introduced a new set of coordinates in which the resultant spacetime metric is diagonal. Consequently, the foliation of the spacetime into spatial hyper-surfaces, which is required for canonical derivation, does not introduce any shift vector. Therefore, these new coordinates lead to a much simpler canonical derivation of the Hawking effect compared to the one reported in Ref. Barman et al. (2018) where one uses the so-called near-null coordinates. Clearly, these coordinates would be quite useful for testing various new quantization techniques Ashtekar et al. (2003); Halvorson (2004); Hossain et al. (2010); Hossain and Sardar (2016a, b); Hossain and Sardar (2015); Barman et al. (2017). We have mentioned earlier that the spacetime metric is diagonal in these new coordinates and up to a scaling the metric is similar to a conformally transformed Minkowski metric. However, it can be checked that these new coordinates cannot be obtained simply by applying a Lorentz boost from $(t,r_{\star})$ coordinates. In this context we may mention that it would be quite interesting to use the canonical formulation as given here, to study the issue of ambiguity in the expression of Hawking temperature due to inequivalent choices of the inertial frames as shown by ’t Hooft ’t Hooft (1984, 1985); Akhmedov et al. (2006, 2008).

Acknowledgements.

We would like to thank Gopal Sardar, Subhajit Barman and Saumya Ghosh for many useful discussions. CS would like to thank IISER Kolkata for supporting this work through a doctoral fellowship.