# An analysis of (the lack of) slip transfer between near-cube oriented   grains in pure Al

**Authors:** T. R Bieler, R. Alizadeh, M. Pe\~na-Ortega, J. LLorca

arXiv: 1902.04322 · 2019-05-01

## TL;DR

This study investigates slip transfer between grains in pure aluminum, revealing that near-cube oriented grains rarely transfer slip across boundaries unless the boundary is very low-angle, emphasizing the role of local slip activity and grain deformation behavior.

## Contribution

It provides new insights into slip transfer mechanisms in near-cube oriented grains, highlighting the importance of slip system activity over boundary misorientation alone.

## Key findings

- Slip transfer is rare in near-cube grains unless boundary misorientation is very low.
- Active slip systems within grains influence slip transfer more than boundary misorientation.
- Near-cube grains tend to self-accommodate rather than transfer slip across boundaries.

## Abstract

Slip transfer across grain boundaries was studied in annealed polycrystalline Al foils deformed in uniaxial tension by means of the analysis of the slip traces on the specimen surface. Grain orientations and selected grain boundary misorientations were measured on both surfaces of the sample using electron back-scattered diffraction mapping. It was found that most of the grains were within 15{\deg} of a cube orientation and approximately half of the grains percolated through the specimen thickness. The Luster-Morris m' parameter (that can be computed from the surface grain orientation) was used to assess the likelihood of slip transfer across boundaries. It was found that transfer across grain boundaries was rare in near-cube oriented grains, and convincing evidence was only found when m' > 0.97, which corresponds to low-angle boundaries with <15{\deg} misorientation. This behavior was explained by the presence of many active slip slips in near-cube oriented grains that favor self-accommodation of the grain shape to the evolving boundary conditions imposed by neighboring grains instead of promoting slip transfer across the boundary. These results indicate that the alignment between slip planes and slip directions across the boundary is not the only important metric to determine the threshold for slip transfer, as the particular details of deformation in each grain (such as the number of available slip systems) also must be considered.

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04322