# Bivariate fluctuations for the number of arithmetic progressions in   random sets

**Authors:** Yacine Barhoumi-Andr\'eani, Christoph Koch, Hong Liu

arXiv: 1902.04176 · 2019-02-13

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the distribution of the number of arithmetic progressions in sparse random subsets of natural numbers, establishing a bivariate central limit theorem and characterizing the limiting behavior based on a threshold function.

## Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive analysis of the joint distribution of arithmetic progressions of different lengths in sparse random sets, including a bivariate CLT and threshold characterization.

## Key findings

- Established the limiting distribution of the count of arithmetic progressions for fixed and growing lengths.
- Proved a bivariate central limit theorem for the joint distribution of progressions of different lengths.
- Characterized the triviality or non-triviality of the limiting distribution via a threshold function.

## Abstract

We study arithmetic progressions $\{a,a+b,a+2b,\dots,a+(\ell-1) b\}$, with $\ell\ge 3$, in random subsets of the initial segment of natural numbers $[n]:=\{1,2,\dots, n\}$. Given $p\in[0,1]$ we denote by $[n]_p$ the random subset of $[n]$ which includes every number with probability $p$, independently of one another. The focus lies on sparse random subsets, i.e.\ when $p=p(n)=o(1)$ as $n\to+\infty$.   Let $X_\ell$ denote the number of distinct arithmetic progressions of length $\ell$ which are contained in $[n]_p$. We determine the limiting distribution for $X_\ell$ not only for fixed $\ell\ge 3$ but also when $\ell=\ell(n)\to+\infty$. The main result concerns the joint distribution of the pair $(X_{\ell},X_{\ell'})$, $\ell>\ell'$, for which we prove a bivariate central limit theorem for a wide range of $p$. Interestingly, the question of whether the limiting distribution is trivial, degenerate, or non-trivial is characterised by the asymptotic behaviour (as $n\to+\infty$) of the threshold function $\psi_\ell=\psi_\ell(n):=np^{\ell-1}\ell$. The proofs are based on the method of moments and combinatorial arguments, such as an algorithmic enumeration of collections of arithmetic progressions.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04176/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04176/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04176