# Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact   cardinal

**Authors:** Brent Cody, Victoria Gitman, Chris Lambie-Hanson

arXiv: 1902.04146 · 2020-01-31

## TL;DR

This paper demonstrates how to force a $oxdot(	ext{weakly compact})$-like principle at a weakly compact cardinal while preserving its weak compactness, and explores the implications for the structure of weakly compact sets.

## Contribution

It introduces a forcing method to establish a $oxdot(	ext{weakly compact})$-like principle at a weakly compact cardinal, extending the understanding of combinatorial principles in large cardinal contexts.

## Key findings

- Existence of a cofinality-preserving extension where $oxdot_1(	ext{weakly compact})$ holds
- In such extensions, every weakly compact subset has a weakly compact initial segment
- Consistency of two weakly compact sets with no common weakly compact initial segment

## Abstract

Hellsten \cite{MR2026390} proved that when $\kappa$ is $\Pi^1_n$-indescribable, the \emph{$n$-club} subsets of $\kappa$ provide a filter base for the $\Pi^1_n$-indescribability ideal, and hence can also be used to give a characterization of $\Pi^1_n$-indescribable sets which resembles the definition of stationarity: a set $S\subseteq\kappa$ is $\Pi^1_n$-indescribable if and only if $S\cap C\neq\emptyset$ for every $n$-club $C\subseteq\kappa$. By replacing clubs with $n$-clubs in the definition of $\Box(\kappa)$, one obtains a $\Box(\kappa)$-like principle $\Box_n(\kappa)$, a version of which was first considered by Brickhill and Welch \cite{BrickhillWelch}. The principle $\Box_n(\kappa)$ is consistent with the $\Pi^1_n$-indescribability of $\kappa$ but inconsistent with the $\Pi^1_{n+1}$-indescribability of $\kappa$. By generalizing the standard forcing to add a $\Box(\kappa)$-sequence, we show that if $\kappa$ is $\kappa^+$-weakly compact and $\mathrm{GCH}$ holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which $\kappa$ remains $\kappa^+$-weakly compact and $\Box_1(\kappa)$ holds. If $\kappa$ is $\Pi^1_2$-indescribable and $\mathrm{GCH}$ holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which $\kappa$ is $\kappa^+$-weakly compact, $\Box_1(\kappa)$ holds and every weakly compact subset of $\kappa$ has a weakly compact proper initial segment. As an application, we prove that, relative to a $\Pi^1_2$-indescribable cardinal, it is consistent that $\kappa$ is $\kappa^+$-weakly compact, every weakly compact subset of $\kappa$ has a weakly compact proper initial segment, and there exist two weakly compact subsets $S^0$ and $S^1$ of $\kappa$ such that there is no $\beta<\kappa$ for which both $S^0\cap\beta$ and $S^1\cap\beta$ are weakly compact.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04146/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04146/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.04146