Lost in Math? A review of 'Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray', by Sabine Hossenfelder
Jeremy Butterfield

TL;DR
This review discusses Sabine Hossenfelder's book on how aesthetic biases like beauty influence physics research, highlighting issues in current theories and research organization, and providing critical perspectives on supersymmetry, naturalness, and the multiverse.
Contribution
The review critically analyzes Hossenfelder's arguments, emphasizing the need to question aesthetic criteria in fundamental physics and the organization of research.
Findings
Highlights the influence of aesthetic biases in physics
Critiques the reliance on supersymmetry and naturalness
Emphasizes the importance of questioning research paradigms
Abstract
This is a review of Hossenfelder's book, 'Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray'. The book gives a breezy exposition of the present situation in fundamental physics, and raises important questions: both about the content of the physics, and the way physics research is organized. I first state my main disagreements. Then, I mostly praise the book: I concentrate on Hossenfelder's discussion of supersymmetry, naturalness and the multiverse.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · advanced mathematical theories
