# The Effect of Time Series Distance Functions on Functional Climate   Networks

**Authors:** Leonardo N. Ferreira, Nicole C. R. Ferreira, Elbert E. N. Macau, Reik, V. Donner

arXiv: 1902.03298 · 2021-09-22

## TL;DR

This paper systematically evaluates 29 time series distance functions to understand their impact on the structure of functional climate networks derived from global temperature data, revealing diverse long-distance connection patterns.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of how different distance functions influence climate network structures, offering new tools for climate variability analysis.

## Key findings

- Different distance functions produce distinct network structures.
- Some functions reveal unique long-distance connection patterns.
- Alternative measures can enhance understanding of climate dynamics.

## Abstract

Complex network theory provides an important tool for the analysis of complex systems such as the Earth's climate. In this context, functional climate networks can be constructed using a spatiotemporal climate dataset and a suitable time series distance function. The resulting coarse-grained view on climate variability consists of representing distinct areas on the globe (i.e., grid cells) by nodes and connecting pairs of nodes that present similar time series. One fundamental concern when constructing such a functional climate network is the definition of a metric that captures the mutual similarity between time series. Here we study systematically the effect of 29 time series distance functions on functional climate network construction based on global temperature data. We observe that the distance functions previously used in the literature commonly generate very similar networks while alternative ones result in rather distinct network structures and reveal different long-distance connection patterns. These patterns are highly important for the study of climate dynamics since they generally represent pathways for the long-distance transportation of energy and can be used to forecast climate variability on subseasonal to interannual or even decadal scales. Therefore, we propose the measures studied here as alternatives for the analysis of climate variability and to further exploit their complementary capability of capturing different aspects of the underlying dynamics that may help gaining a more holistic empirical understanding of the global climate system.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03298/full.md

## Figures

30 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03298/full.md

## References

82 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03298/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03298