# Observations of red giants with suspected massive companions

**Authors:** Valeri V. Makarov, Andrei Tokovinin

arXiv: 1902.03145 · 2019-03-22

## TL;DR

This study monitored four red giants with large radial velocity variations to search for massive companions, but found no such companions above 2.5 solar masses, providing insights into binary systems involving red giants.

## Contribution

The paper presents observational data on red giants with RV variations, highlighting the rarity of massive companions and clarifying the nature of observed RV changes.

## Key findings

- No red giants contained companions above 2.5 solar masses.
- Identified a single-lined binary with an 81-day period and high proper motion.
- Detected a double-lined binary with a 4.37-day period and high X-ray luminosity.

## Abstract

Motivated by the existence of binary systems where a stellar-mass black hole is bound to a normal star, we selected four red giants with large radial velocity (RV) variation from the survey of SIM grid stars and monitored their RVs for several months. None turned out to contain a massive companion above 2.5 solar masses. The red giant TYC 9299-1080-1 with a large RV and a large proper motion is a single-lined spectroscopic binary with a period of 81 days. It is an extreme halo object moving at 350 km s$^{-1}$ almost directly toward the Galactic center. HD 206092 is a double-lined binary with a short period of 4.37 days. It belongs to the rare class of active RS CVn-type binaries with evolved primary components, apparently undergoing mass transfer. The X-ray luminosity of HD 206092 is about twice as high as the most luminous coronal X-ray emitters observed by ROSAT, including II Peg and the prototype star RS CVn. HD~318347 has a variable double-peaked emission-line spectrum (not a giant), while HD~324668 has a constant RV. Despite the overall good quality of the SIM survey data confirmed by a comparison with Gaia DR2 mean radial velocities, the few large RV variations are explained, mostly, by erroneous data. We discuss the significance of the non-detection of massive companions in the SIM grid sample and the associated work.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03145/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03145/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03145/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.03145