Quality quantification in Systems Engineering from the Qualimetry Eye
Yann Argotti (LAAS-ISI), Claude Baron (LAAS-ISI), Phillipe Esteban, (LAAS-ISI)

TL;DR
This paper explores how qualimetry can improve quality quantification in systems engineering by addressing current limitations and introducing a new framework and process for designing adaptable quality models.
Contribution
The authors introduce the 'House of Qualimetry' framework, a set of attributes for quality models, and a new process for designing and adapting quality models in systems engineering.
Findings
Identified limitations of current quality quantification approaches.
Proposed the 'House of Qualimetry' framework and six pillars.
Introduced a new process for designing and adapting quality models.
Abstract
Nowadays, quality definition, assessment, control and prediction cannot easily be missed in systems engineering. One common factor among these activities is quality quantification. Therefore, throughout this paper, the authors focus on the problems relating to quality quantification in systems engineering. They first identify the main drawbacks of the current approaches adopted in this domain. They demonstrate how current solutions are not easily repeatable and adaptable across systems and how in most cases, the related standards such as ISO/IEC 25010 or Automotive-SPICE to cite just a few, are not used as they are within companies today. Fortunately, qualimetry, a young science with the purpose of quality quantification, provides the tools to resolve these gaps. To be able to use these tools, the authors propose a synthetic representation of qualimetry and its six pillars, named the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
