Centralizers in Mapping Class Group and decidability of Thurston Equivalence
Kasra Rafi, Nikita Selinger, Michael Yampolsky

TL;DR
This paper establishes a constructive bound for centralizers in the Mapping Class Group and proves that Thurston equivalence of certain sphere coverings is algorithmically decidable.
Contribution
It provides a constructive bound for centralizers and demonstrates the decidability of Thurston equivalence for postcritically finite branched coverings.
Findings
Bound for the word length of centralizers
Decidability of Thurston equivalence
Algorithmic approach for sphere coverings
Abstract
We find a constructive bound for the word length of a generating set for the centralizer of an element of the Mapping Class Group. As a consequence, we show that it is algorithmically decidable whether two postcritically finite branched coverings of the sphere are Thurston equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · semigroups and automata theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
