# Probing Bayesian credible regions intrinsically: a feasible error   certification for physical systems

**Authors:** C. Oh, Y. S. Teo, H. Jeong

arXiv: 1902.02599 · 2019-07-31

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method for efficiently certifying the error and credibility of Bayesian estimators in physical systems, especially quantum state tomography, using average log-likelihoods instead of computationally intensive sampling.

## Contribution

It reformulates Bayesian credible-region theory to rely on region averages, enabling feasible error certification without rejection sampling or full parameter space knowledge.

## Key findings

- Region-average log-likelihood suffices for size and credibility estimation.
- Analytical formulas for $l_2$-norm distance provide asymptotic error certification.
- Method applicable to large datasets and quantum systems without Monte Carlo methods.

## Abstract

Computing size and credibility of Bayesian credible regions for certifying the reliability of any point estimator of an unknown parameter (such as a quantum state, channel, phase, \emph{etc.}) relies on rejection sampling from the entire parameter space that is practically infeasible for large datasets. We reformulate the Bayesian credible-region theory to show that both properties can be obtained solely from the average of log-likelihood over the region itself, which is computable with direct region sampling. Neither rejection sampling nor any geometrical knowledge about the whole parameter space is necessary, so that general error certification now becomes feasible. We take this region-average theory to the next level by generalizing size to the average $l_p$-norm distance $(p>0)$ between a random region point and the estimator, and present analytical formulas for $p=2$ to estimate distance-induced size and credibility for any physical system and large datasets, thus implying that asymptotic Bayesian error certification is possible without any Monte~Carlo computation. All results are discussed in the context of quantum-state tomography.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.02599/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.02599/full.md

## References

41 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.02599/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1902.02599