Free Stein Irregularity and Dimension
Ian Charlesworth, Brent Nelson

TL;DR
This paper introduces the free Stein irregularity and free Stein dimension, connecting them to key free probability concepts and invariants, and computes these dimensions in various examples.
Contribution
It defines the free Stein irregularity and free Stein dimension, establishing their relationships with existing free probability invariants and demonstrating their properties and computations.
Findings
Free Stein dimension equals free entropy dimension in one-variable case.
The free Stein dimension is a $*$-algebra invariant.
Computed free Stein dimension in multiple multivariable examples.
Abstract
We introduce a free probabilistic quantity called free Stein irregularity, which is defined in terms of free Stein discrepancies. It turns out that this quantity is related via a simple formula to the Murray--von Neumann dimension of the closure of the domain of the adjoint of the non-commutative Jacobian associated to Voiculescu's free difference quotients. We call this dimension the free Stein dimension, and show that it is a -algebra invariant. We relate these quantities to the free Fisher information, the non-microstates free entropy, and the non-microstates free entropy dimension. In the one-variable case, we show that the free Stein dimension agrees with the free entropy dimension, and in the multivariable case compute it in a number of examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Free Stein Irregularity and Dimension
Ian Charlesworth∘
∘Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley [email protected]
and
Brent Nelson∙
∙Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University [email protected]
Abstract.
We introduce a free probabilistic quantity called free Stein irregularity, which is defined in terms of free Stein discrepancies. It turns out that this quantity is related via a simple formula to the Murray–von Neumann dimension of the closure of the domain of the adjoint of the non-commutative Jacobian associated to Voiculescu’s free difference quotients. We call this dimension the free Stein dimension, and show that it is a -algebra invariant. We relate these quantities to the free Fisher information, the non-microstates free entropy, and the non-microstates free entropy dimension. In the one-variable case, we show that the free Stein dimension agrees with the free entropy dimension, and in the multivariable case compute it in a number of examples.
Introduction.
In free probability, given an -tuple of self-adjoint operators in a tracial von Neumann algebra , a regularity condition is some quantitative behavior of the joint distribution of that implies some qualitative behavior of the individual operators or the algebras (von Neumann or otherwise) that they generate. All of the well-studied regularity conditions fall broadly into two categories: microstates and non-microstates. Examples of the former include Voiculescu’s microstates free entropy , microstates free entropy dimension [Voi94], modified microstates free entropy dimension [Voi96], upper free orbit dimension [HS07], and 1-bounded entropy [Hay18]. Examples of the latter include non-microstates free entropy , free Fisher information [Voi98], non-microstates free entropy dimensions and , and [CS05].
Roughly speaking, microstates quantities examine the joint distribution of in terms of how well it is approximated by finite dimensional matrix algebras, whereas non-microstates quantities consider the behavior of certain derivations on the polynomial algebra generated by . We recall a few of the regularity conditions corresponding to the aforementioned free probabilistic quantities:
- •
If , then the spectral measure of is Lebesgue absolutely continuous with density in [Voi93].
- •
If , then is diffuse (i.e. its spectral measures has no atoms) [Voi94].
- •
If , then has no Cartan subalgebras and does not have property [Voi96].
- •
If , then is prime [Ge98].
- •
If , then does not have property [Dab10].
- •
If , then is a factor [Dab10].
- •
If , then every non-constant, self-adjoint is diffuse [CS16, MSW17].
- •
If , then for every non-constant, self-adjoint [BM18].
In the present paper, we propose new quantities that fall into the non-microstates category: free Stein irregularity and free Stein dimension (see Definitions 2.1 and 2.11). Motivated by work of the second author in [FN17], these quantities are defined via the free analogues of Stein kernels and Stein discrepancy (see [LNP15] and its references). Given an -tuple , the free Stein discrepancy of relative to this -tuple (see Subsection 1.2) is a non-negative quantity that measures how close are to being the conjugate variables to . In particular, the free Stein discrepancy is zero if and only if are the conjugate variables, in which case and so the above results tell us that does not have property and for every non-constant, self-adjoint . Of course, determining that the free Stein discrepancy was zero required preexisting knowledge of the -tuple — or a very lucky guess.
In this paper, we explore what can be said if instead one merely supposes that the free Stein discrepancy can be made arbitrarily small by varying the -tuple . We are therefore naturally driven to consider the infimum of free Stein discrepancies, which we define as the free Stein irregularity, and the situation of interest is simply the regularity condition of having zero free Stein irregularity. One immediately has that this is a weaker regularity condition than , but it turns out to be a stronger condition than (see Corollary 4.4). Interestingly, in the one variable case is equivalent to having zero free Stein irregularity. This is because for , the square of the free Stein irregularity can be computed explicitly and is given by the sum of the squares of masses of any atoms in the spectral measure of (see Theorem 4.5). In the general case, the free Stein irregularity is (somewhat surprisingly) given by a formula involving the Murray–von Neumann dimension of the domain of an unbounded operator (see Theorem 2.10): namely, the adjoint of the non-commutative Jacobian associated to Voiculescu’s free difference quotients (see Subsection 1.1). We call this dimension the free Stein dimension of , and are able to further relate it to a module of closable derivations on the . From this characterization it follows that the free Stein dimension is a -algebra invariant (see Theorem 3.2). Furthermore, we also consider the above quantities when are considered as variables over a unital -subalgebra .
The structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 1 we establish some notation and recall the definitions of free Stein kernels and free Stein discrepancy. In Section 2, we define free Stein irregularity, derive some elementary properties, and define free Stein dimension. In Section 3, we characterize free Stein dimension through modules of closable derivations and use this to show algebraic invariance. In Section 4, we relate the free Stein irregularity and dimension to free Fisher information and non-microstates free entropy dimension(s), and compute the both explicitly in the one-variable case. In Section 5, we compute the (multivariable) free Stein irregularity and dimension for a tuple of generating a group algebra or finite-dimensional algebra. We conclude the paper with a few appendices detailing interesting examples and computations.
Acknowledgments.
The authors would like to thank Dimitri Shlyakhtenko for his useful comments and suggestions; in particular, for suggesting a cleaner approach to the results in Section 3. They would also like to thank Michael Hartglass, Benjamin Hayes, and David Jekel for helpful discussions related to this paper. This work was initiated while the authors were attending the Park City Mathematics Institute (PCMI) Summer Session on Random Matrices. Part of this research was performed while the authors were visiting the Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics (IPAM), which is supported by the National Science Foundation. The first and second authors were supported by NSF grants DMS-1803557 and DMS-1502822, respectively.
1. Preliminaries.
1.1 Notation.
Throughout denotes a tracial -probability space. We denote by the GNS Hilbert space corresponding to and identify with its representation on this space. We let denote the opposite von Neumann algebra, represented on which can be identified with the dual Hilbert space to . We let denote the von Neumann algebra tensor product, which is equipped with the tensor product trace . We will typically repress the ‘’ notation on elements of .
Throughout, will denote a tuple (not necessarily self-adjoint), and will be a unital subalgebra. We will always assume that for each , for some (possibly if is actually self-adjoint). will denote a family of indeterminates of the same length as , and will be the algebra generated by and . Note that there is a unique unital homomorphism which sends each to , which we will denote ; is always surjective but may fail to be injective. We will also use to denote the corresponding maps on , , and .
For each , the free difference quotient is defined to be the (unique) linear map with and , satisfying the Leibniz rule; more precisely,
[TABLE]
We similarly define by , and let be the non-commutative Jacobian:
[TABLE]
For in either or denote
[TABLE]
For denote
[TABLE]
We denote by the usual product in (), the usual product in , the action of on (), the diagonal action of on , and the action of on .
In the case that satisfy no -algebraic relations, we can view and defined on polynomials in the variables rather than the indeterminates , and so they become densely-defined operators on or with codomains , or , respectively.
We denote by , , and the adjoints of the implied relations on ; for example, we define to be the map with domain consisting of those for which there is some such that for all we have
[TABLE]
we then set . Thus , , and are unbounded operators, although their domains may fail to be dense. When or are clear from context, we may suppress the relevant subscript.
Lastly, let us denote
[TABLE]
so that .
1.2 Free Stein kernels and free Stein discrepancy.
We recall some definitions below from [FN17]. These have been modified slightly to accommodate our consideration of non-algebraically free operators over a unital subalgebra , but when is algebraically free and , we recover the original definition. By working in this broader generality, we reap a number of benefits: we are able to consider freeness with amalgamation; we are able to compute free Stein dimensions in finite-dimensional algebras; and we are able derive some interesting statements about the free Stein dimension of certain generators of interpolated free group factors (see Appendix B). The reader may find it useful to gain intuition by considering (as the authors have) the simpler case outlined in Remark 2.3, where , is algebraically free and self-adjoint, and the free difference quotients are densely defined operators.
Given , we say that
[TABLE]
is a free Stein kernel of relative to over if and : to wit, if
[TABLE]
In this case we say (after [Shl04]) that is a partial conjugate variable to corresponding to .
The free Stein discrepancy of relative to over is the quantity
[TABLE]
where as before the infimum is over all free Stein kernels of relative to over . Equivalently, where is any free Stein kernel of relative to and is the orthogonal projection onto the closure of the range of .
A priori the free Stein discrepancy could be infinite, since a free Stein kernel for need not exist. Indeed, if is not orthogonal to then for some we have
[TABLE]
For general unital subalgebras , it is not clear if the condition is sufficient to guarantee the existence of free Stein kernels. However, in the case it suffices by [CFM18, Theorem 2.1], which we state below.
Proposition 1.1** ([CFM18]).**
For ,
[TABLE]
is a free Stein kernel for relative to . Consequently, always.
Remark 1.2**.**
For larger unital subalgebras , given in Proposition 1.1 may fail to be a free Stein kernel. Indeed, if are freely independent semicircular variables, , and , one can compute that while
[TABLE]
One might hope that in nice cases is the free Stein kernel which attains the free Stein discrepancy of , but unfortunately this holds if and only if (see Appendix A). However, we do obtain the following corollary:
Corollary 1.3**.**
The map
[TABLE]
is continuous.
Proof.
For let and be as in Proposition 1.1. Then
[TABLE]
where is a constant depending only on and . ∎
Remark 1.4**.**
If , then is a free Stein kernel for and hence
[TABLE]
That is, is the usual conjugate variable to . In fact, this is precisely why the free Stein discrepancy is defined to measure the distance between a free Stein kernel and . We remind the reader that the free Fisher information of is defined as the quantity
[TABLE]
if is the conjugate variable to , whereas it is defined to be if no conjugate variable exists (cf. [Voi98, Definition 6.1]).
Furthermore, if and only if is the conjugate variable to if and only if is a free semicircular family.
2. Free Stein Irregularity.
We begin with the definition of free Stein irregularity. In order to better motivate and clarify the definition, it is followed by an examination of a special case.
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a tuple of operators such that for each , for some . Let be a unital -subalgebra of . The free Stein irregularity of over is the quantity
[TABLE]
For , the -bounded free Stein irregularity of over is the quantity
[TABLE]
Note that . In the particular case , we will use the shorthand .
Remark 2.2**.**
Notice that if , there are fewer free Stein kernels of over than over (as there are more polynomials and so more relations must be satisfied); it follows that . More formally, if is the trace-preserving conditional expectation onto the von Neumann algebra generated by , then the claimed inequality follows from the inclusion .
Remark 2.3**.**
Consider the following special case: let be an -tuple of self-adjoint operators generating . Assume that are algebraically free so that is a -algebra isomorphism. This allows us to view the free difference quotients , , as defined directly on , and—moreover—as densely defined (unbounded) operators of the form
[TABLE]
Similarly, and may be regarded as maps densely defined on the appropriate Hilbert spaces.
In this context, a free Stein kernel of relative to some is simply an element of with . Consequently, the free Stein irregularity, which is given by the formula
[TABLE]
(see Definition 2.1), is equivalently the distance between and (the closure of) in . The free Stein irregularity can be thought of as quantitative measurement of how close the -tuple is to having conjugate variables. Indeed, capturing such a defect was the original motivation for defining this quantity and if we consider the following technical modification
[TABLE]
then if and only if an -tuple of conjugate variables to exists and is bounded by (see Theorem 4.1).
It turns out that the Hilbert subspace is a left -module (see Lemma 2.9) and that its Murray–von Neumann dimension is related to the free Stein irregularity by the following formula:
[TABLE]
(see Theorem 2.10). We are thus compelled to study the quantity on the left-hand side, which we denote by and call the free Stein dimension of . Analogously to free entropy dimension, it satisfies the inequality
[TABLE]
where is another tuple of self-adjoint operators generating some (potentially larger) von Neumann algebra along with ; equality holds if and are freely independent (see Corollary 2.7). It is also a -algebra invariant (see Theorem 3.2) and compares to the non-microstates free entropy dimensions:
[TABLE]
(see Corollary 4.4). Moreover, it is known to agree with these other dimensions in a number of cases (see Theorem 4.5, Proposition 5.1, and Corollary 5.2). In particular, when and is a self-adjoint operator with spectral measure we have
[TABLE]
It is thus natural to wonder whether these dimensions always agree. However, some basic relations still elude us. For example, when it is known that , but it remains open whether or not this implies as well.
2.1 Elementary Properties.
We derive some useful properties of free Stein irregularity.
Proposition 2.4**.**
.
Proof.
Denote . We have by Remark 2.2, so we need only establish the other inequality. Now, let us suppose that is a Stein kernel for relative to over . Fix with and for take a sequence converging strongly to with norms uniformly bounded by (such exists by Kaplansky’s density theorem). Then if we let
[TABLE]
we find converges to in , while converges to in . If and are chosen in a similar way, it follows that
[TABLE]
that is, is also a Stein kernel for relative to over . Hence . ∎
Lemma 2.5**.**
Let be unital -subalgebras, and let be a common unital -subalgebra with conditional expectation , where is the -algebra generated by and . If is free from with amalgamation over , then
[TABLE]
In particular, if is free from , then .
Proof.
By Remark 2.2, it suffices to prove . We will prove this by showing . Let , with . Take with for , and with for ; set .
We claim
[TABLE]
If , the left-hand side is since is orthogonal to and free from with amalgamation. The right-hand side is zero by the definition of . If , it is not hard to check that both sides are zero due to freeness with amalgamation over . Thus it remains to establish the claim when . In this case, invoking freeness with amalgamation, we have:
[TABLE]
This completes the proof of the claim.
Finally, since such elements span , this shows that , completing the proof. ∎
Theorem 2.6**.**
Let be unital -subalgebras, and let , be tuples. Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, suppose is a common unital -subalgebra with conditional expectation . If and are free with amalgamation over , then the above inequalities are equalities.
Proof.
Let . Let be the entry-wise projection of the top-left sub-matrix of onto , and let be the entry-wise projection of the bottom-right sub-matrix of onto . One easily checks that and . Hence
[TABLE]
Since was arbitrary, this yields the first inequality.
Next, let and . It is easily checked that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
and so the second inequality follows.
Finally, if and are free with amalgamation over , then by Lemma 2.5 we have
[TABLE]
Similarly, . This forces the claimed equality. ∎
Applying the previous theorem to the special case , yields the following corollary.
Corollary 2.7**.**
- (1)
If and are free with amalgamation over B, then
[TABLE] 3. (2)
If and are free, then
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.8**.**
The function is convex.
Proof.
Let . Let with , . Then for , with
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Taking the infimum over and completes the proof. ∎
2.2 Free Stein dimension.
In this subsection we give a characterization of the free Stein irregularity in terms of the Murray–von Neumann dimension of the closure of in , viewed as a left -module. We first show, in the following lemma, that admits a left action; this is the multivariate analogue of [Voi98, Proposition 4.1] and follows by an identical proof.
Lemma 2.9**.**
For and , with
[TABLE]
From this lemma we see that is invariant under the left action of . Consequently, the Kaplansky density theorem implies that is a closed, left -module. Observe that for , if (i.e. the -th row of ) for , then . It then follows that is also a closed, left -module satisfying . This identification immediately gives the second equality in the following theorem.
Theorem 2.10**.**
For a unital -subalgebra and such that ,
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be the projection of onto so that . Hence
[TABLE]
Now, identify with its diagonal representation on . Then is identified with . Observe that
[TABLE]
where is the vector with in the -th entry and zeros elsewhere. In fact, in the last space is sent to its transpose in the first space. Let be the projection of onto , so that ; then , and we further claim that . Indeed, for let be the rows of as in the discussion preceding the theorem. Hence and so
[TABLE]
Thus and
[TABLE]
So the result follows by our previous computation. ∎
In light of the above theorem, we make the following definition.
Definition 2.11**.**
For an -tuple , the free Stein dimension of over is the quantity
[TABLE]
We can rephrase Theorem 2.6 and Corollary 2.7 in terms of free Stein dimension as follows:
Corollary 2.12**.**
Let be unital -subalgebras, and let , be tuples. Then
[TABLE]
Moreover, suppose is a common unital -subalgebra with conditional expectation . If and are free with amalgamation over , then the above inequalities are equalities.
In particular, if and are free with amalgamation over B, then
[TABLE]
Furthermore, if and are free, then
[TABLE]
3. Via Closable Derivations.
In this section we characterize in terms of certain closable derivations on . This perspective yields a number of invariance results; in particular, that depends only on the algebras and .
For an inclusion of two -subalgebras with , consider the set
[TABLE]
This set of derivations admits a right -action:
[TABLE]
Indeed, by the same proof as [Voi98, Proposition 4.1] and so
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.1**.**
For a -subalgebra and , the conjugate linear map
[TABLE]
is a bijection that maps the right -action on to the left regular -action on . Consequently, when
[TABLE]
Proof.
First notice that each element of is determined by its values on . Hence is injective.
Now, given , we have for any
[TABLE]
Thus .
Given , define
[TABLE]
Then for one has
[TABLE]
where the last equality uses Lemma 2.9. It follows that for some with . In particular, . Thus . ∎
3.1 Algebraic invariance.
If satisfies , then yields a left -module isomorphism of . This extends to a left -module isomorphism . Using Theorem 2.10 we obtain the following theorem:
Theorem 3.2**.**
If satisfies , then
[TABLE]
Remark 3.3**.**
It follows from Theorem 3.2 that for any , we have
[TABLE]
In particular, if then .
For every we have the following map:
[TABLE]
Of course, if then this map is the identity map, but otherwise it is potentially neither injective nor surjective. Nevertheless, one can therefore always consider the composition .
Proposition 3.4**.**
Let with for some . Then for , we have
[TABLE]
with . Moreover, extends to a map , and when one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let and . For , we have that is given by the derivation defined in the proof of Lemma 3.1. In particular, . It follows that
[TABLE]
and so Equation (2) holds. As the right action of is bounded, we immediately obtain the extension . Furthermore, commutes with the left action of and so is a left -module map when . Hence the claimed inequality follows from Theorem 2.10 and the rank–nullity theorem. ∎
This structure in many cases puts restrictions on the sort of kernels that may be produced for a given tuple. For example, in light of Theorem 2.6 (and in particular its proof) one may ask whether a kernel for may always be extended to a kernel for a larger system , as in many nice cases this can be done. However, using the above proposition, Example B.5 shows that this is not always possible.
Remark 3.5**.**
Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 3.4 can be generalized slightly by considering the following non-commutative power series. After [CS16], for we denote by the completion of in the norm
[TABLE]
Note that this is in fact a Banach norm. We also denote
[TABLE]
This space should be regarded as non-commutative power series with radius of convergence strictly greater than . Observe that if , the evaluation extends continuously to a homomorphism that sends to . We denote .
It is readily seen that the derivations , , extend to derivations on that are valued in the projective tensor product . The evaluation map on extends to and is valued in . Consequently, when , any can be extended to by
[TABLE]
That is,
[TABLE]
In fact, the above inclusion is an equality. Indeed, all concerned derivations are closable by virtue of having in the domain of their adjoints. Consequently, such a derivation on is uniquely determined by its values on . It follows that for , if then .
3.2 The special case of .
We consider now the special case . Of particular interest to us will be the case when gives a closable densely defined operator , in which case we denote its closure by . (We will see in Corollary 4.7 that this is equivalent to the condition .) Since is a derivation which is symmetric in the sense that
[TABLE]
it follows from [DL92] that is a symmetric derivation on , which is itself a -algebra.
Theorem 3.6**.**
Let . Suppose gives a closable densely defined operator. Then for any with for each , we have .
Proof.
First note that since is a -algebra, it contains . Moreover, since each is a bounded operator, is a bounded operator for every .
Now, given define by
[TABLE]
We claim . Indeed, it is a derivation by virtue of being a derivation on . To see that , note that for any there is a sequence converging to in with converging to in . Consequently,
[TABLE]
where the second-to-last equality follows from the fact that the adjoint is an isometry on . Thus with . This establishes the claim.
Next consider . We claim for each . Indeed, for each let be a sequence converging to in with converging to in . Then for each and any we have
[TABLE]
This yields the claimed equality since is dense in .
The first claim established the existence of a map
[TABLE]
The second claim shows that every derivation in the latter set is completely determined by its values on the tuple and for . It follows that the above map is a bijection, and so by Lemma 3.1 we have . ∎
Remark 3.7**.**
For , Theorem 3.6 applies to any as in Remark 3.5. It also applies to , where is self-adjoint with and . In this case , where is the image of the function
[TABLE]
under the identification of the unital -algebra generated by and with continuous functions on its spectrum. Moreover, this can be further extended to Lipschitz functions on (see [DL92, Theorem 5.1]).
Lastly, we show that is a lower bound for as soon as contains a diffuse element. In particular, this implies that for any generating set of the hyperfinite factor .
Theorem 3.8**.**
If contains a diffuse element, then .
Proof.
We first note that for any elementary tensor , defines an element of with
[TABLE]
Furthermore,
[TABLE]
Thus we can extend the map into a left -module map
[TABLE]
If is injective, then it will follow that
[TABLE]
Suppose satisfies . Consequently, for and so it follows that for all . Let be a diffuse element, which exists by hypothesis. Since we can identify , implies . Thus is injective. ∎
4. Relation to Free Entropy.
We now turn to an examination of how free Stein irregularity and dimension relate to the free Fisher information and non-microstates free entropy dimension(s).
Theorem 4.1**.**
For , if and only if .
Proof.
Suppose . Then there exists a sequence such that and for all . Let be a free Stein kernel of relative to over such that . Then . Hence for every we have
[TABLE]
The density of in implies the sequence (since it is uniformly bounded) converges weakly to some . Moreover, the above limit implies is the conjugate variable of with respect to and
[TABLE]
The converse is immediate. ∎
The following result is a minor generalization of [Shl04, Theorem 2.7] (which corresponds to the special case ). We state it here using our notation and terminology, but the core idea of the proof is not novel.
Proposition 4.2**.**
Let be a free semicircular family, free from . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be any decreasing function such that
[TABLE]
(E.g. . Then
[TABLE]
For each , let be such that and such that there exists a free Stein kernel for relative to over such that
[TABLE]
Recall that the conjugate variables to with respect to are where is the conditional expectation (cf. [Voi98, Corollary 3.9]). By the same proof as in [Shl04, Lemma 2.3], it follows that
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
This tends to as . ∎
We remind the reader that the relative non-microstates free entropy of with respect to is defined as the quantity
[TABLE]
where is a free semicircular family free from (cf. [Voi98, Definition 7.1]). The following is a minor generalization of [Shl04, Corollary 2.8]. As with the previous result, we state it using our notation and terminology, but the core idea of the proof is not novel.
Proposition 4.3**.**
Let be a free semicircular family free from . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Using [Voi98, Corollary 6.14] and implementing the change of variable in the integral appearing in the above definition of , we obtain
[TABLE]
Now, for any free Stein kernel relative to some over we have
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Since for , this in turn implies
[TABLE]
Since was an arbitrary free Stein kernel over , we obtain the desired inequality. ∎
We remind the reader that the there are two versions of the relative non-microstates free entropy dimension of with respect to :
[TABLE]
where is a free semicircular family free from ; moreover, (cf. [CS05, Section 4.1.1]111Although this paper was interested only in the case , the idea generalizes straightforwardly by using the relative versions of and . ). Thus from Proposition 4.3 we obtain:
Corollary 4.4**.**
For any -algebra and -tuple ,
[TABLE]
Recall that in the self-adjoint one-variable case , one has
[TABLE]
by [Voi94, Proposition 6.3] and [Voi98, Propositions 7.5 and 7.6], where is the distribution of on . Thus, in particular, the following theorem shows that the above inequalities are in fact equalities.
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let be self-adjoint with distribution on . Then
[TABLE]
Consequently, if and only if has no atoms.
Proof.
Recall that in the one-variable case
[TABLE]
Thus Corollary 4.4 implies
[TABLE]
To see the reverse inequality, consider for the function
[TABLE]
Observe that . In particular, for any polynomial we have
[TABLE]
That is, is a free Stein kernel for relative to . So we compute for
[TABLE]
Letting first tend to zero and then , we obtain the other inequality. ∎
Remark 4.6**.**
As a particular example of Theorem 4.5, for we have
[TABLE]
where is the number of distinct eigenvalues of with respective multiplicities .
The inequalities in Corollary 4.4 also enable us to prove the following.
Corollary 4.7**.**
Suppose . Then if and only if gives a densely defined closable operator
[TABLE]
and if and only if gives a densely defined closable operator
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let us suppose that ; since , has full free entropy dimension. It then follows from [CS16] that satisfies no algebraic relation, and hence we may view and as densely defined operators with the above domains and codomains. Moreover, by Theorem 2.10, and are densely defined, whence and are closable.
Contrariwise, when either or gives a linear operator, its adjoint as an unbounded operator and its adjoint arising from evaluation of polynomials in agree. The closability of or is then equivalent to their adjoints having dense domains, and so Theorem 2.10 yields the result. ∎
This also allows us to reword Theorem 3.6 as follows:
Corollary 4.8**.**
Let . Suppose . Then for any with for each , we have .
4.1 Regularity hierarchy
Let us relate the condition to other well-studied regularity conditions. We have the following picture:
[TABLE]
The top two arrows are of course well-known results: the first is [Voi98, Proposition 7.9] while the second follows from [Voi98, Proposition 7.5] and the definition of in [CS05, Section 4.1.1]. The bottom two arrows follow from Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 4.4, respectively. Thus it is natural to ask what the relationship is between having finite non-microstates free entropy and having full free Stein dimension. In the case , we see that the former implies the latter by Theorem 4.5.
Remark 4.9**.**
The above raises some interesting questions:
Does imply in general? 2. 2.
Does in general?
We begin to investigate the first question below; then, in Section 5, we exhibit some cases where the equality in the second question holds.
In order to be begin analyzing the relationship between these two conditions, consider the the following quantity:
[TABLE]
That is, compares how quickly decays as grows. Note that if we have ; however, it may be that even when . Indeed, consider the Example B.3 below.
Proposition 4.10**.**
With as above, if then .
Proof.
Let . Then there exists such that for all we have
[TABLE]
Let . Then substituting we have
[TABLE]
Using Equation (4) we therefore have
[TABLE]
Since and we have that the above quantity is integrable on . ∎
5. Some Computations of Free Stein Dimension.
We provide some examples in which the free Stein irregularity and dimension can be explicitly computed. In particular, we show that in these examples the free Stein dimension agrees with the non-microstates free entropy dimensions. The first result concerns Atiyah’s -Betti numbers for discrete groups (cf. [Ati76, CG86]). Also see [Lüc02, Chapter 1] for the definition considered here, and [MS05] for the connection to free entropy dimension.
Proposition 5.1**.**
Let be a discrete group and let generate the group algebra. Then
[TABLE]
where and are the -Betti numbers of .
Proof.
It was shown in [MS05, Theorem 4.1] that
[TABLE]
So, by Corollary 4.4, it suffices to show
[TABLE]
We make use of the following space from [Shl06, Section 2]: where
[TABLE]
We can identify with a closed subspace in using the identification
[TABLE]
where is the rank one projection onto . By [Shl06, Theorem 1], for every we have where is the derivation defined by
[TABLE]
Observe that if is the Tomita conjugation operator on , then for we have
[TABLE]
Consequently, if and only if . It follows that and so
[TABLE]
where the latter dimension is as a right -module. In the proof of [Shl06, Corollary 4] it was shown that the latter dimension is , and so Theorem 2.10 completes the proof. ∎
Our final example concerns finite-dimensional von Neumann algebras, for which , , , and are known to agree. We show here that can be added to this list.
Corollary 5.2**.**
Consider a finite-dimensional algebra for the form
[TABLE]
where the are positive and sum to one, and is the normalized trace on . Then for any tuple of generators , we have
[TABLE]
In particular, .
Proof.
In the proof of [Shl06, Corollary 5] it is shown that
[TABLE]
where is as in the proof of Proposition 5.1. Hence equality with follows from the proof of Proposition 5.1. The remaining equalities are then simply [Shl06, Corollary 5] (see also [CS05], namely Proposition 2.9 and Equation 3.10). ∎
Appendix A
In this appendix we will demonstrate that for self-adjoint and algebraically free, the Mai kernel (given in Proposition 1.1) satisfies
[TABLE]
if and only if . We emphasize that any free Stein kernel attaining the free Stein discrepancy of is necessarily contained in the closure of the range of .
Let be the derivation given by commutation against : . Given , let be given by applying to each coordinate: .
Lemma A.1**.**
Suppose that . If is a sequence in so that
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Observe that , so that it has a bounded right action on . Thus the equation follows from a straightforward computation:
[TABLE]
The lemma applies, in particular, to the rows of any free Stein kernel that attains the free Stein discrepancy of .
Proposition A.2**.**
Suppose , and let be as in Proposition 1.1:
[TABLE]
If , then .
Proof.
First note that it suffices to assume that . Indeed, let
[TABLE]
Then clearly and consequently . Moreover, is unchanged when replacing with . Now for any
[TABLE]
if is a free Stein kernel for relative to , then by the chain rule it is also a free Stein kernel for relative to , and vice versa. Hence and so, replacing with if necessary, we may assume .
Note that the -th row of is given by , and from the assumption that we have that . Now, pick in so that ; since , we may assume , replacing by if needed. Then from Lemma A.1, we have . Hence
[TABLE]
We compute
[TABLE]
Subtracting common terms on each side, we find
[TABLE]
As is algebraically free, we may find polynomials and such that while is orthogonal to all other monomials of degree at most two, and while is orthogonal to all other monomials of degree at most three. Applying the map to the above equality yields
[TABLE]
whence is a polynomial in of degree at most two. Now, applying to Equation 5 and using the fact that is a polynomial of degree at most three, we find
[TABLE]
From this it follows that is a linear combination of . But then must be a linear combination of and ; say . Looking at the coefficient of in the above equation, we find that ; since , we have , whence . As , . ∎
Appendix B
In this appendix we consider a few informative examples. The first two show that for certain tuples generating interpolated free group factors , the parameter can be recovered through a formula involving the free Stein dimension of the tuples.
Example B.1**.**
Let be a free semicircular family. Let and for each , let be projections in that are either equal or orthogonal. Define if and otherwise. Then by [Răd94] we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Let and let be the -tuple consisting of the (and if ). We claim
[TABLE]
Indeed, define to be the diagonal matrix whose entry is if . Note that is a projection, and by freeness one easily sees that with . Consequently, . On the other hand, . Thus for any we have
[TABLE]
Consequently
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Equation (6) then follows since .
Example B.2**.**
Fix a finite, connected graph with vertex weighting satisfying , and let be the associated directed graph (cf. [HN18]). Recall that the free graph von Neumann algebra is generated by operators and an orthogonal family of projections , which satisfy the following graph relations:
- •
for all ;
- •
for all ;
- •
for all and .
Moreover, there is a trace-preserving isomorphism between and the interpolated free group factor with parameter
[TABLE]
where is the number of edges connecting to .
Let , , and . We claim
[TABLE]
By [Har17, Lemma 3.9] (see also [HN18, Lemma 2.1]), one has where is the projection given by the diagonal matrix with -entry given by . Then one has . On the other hand, observe that . So the other inequality follows by precisely the same argument as in the previous example. Thus
[TABLE]
Finally, appealing to Corollary 5.2 yields Equation (7).
The next example was concocted to demonstrate explicitly that in Equation (4) does not imply . It also demonstrates the fact that full free entropy dimension is strictly weaker than finite free entropy, by explicitly constructing a probability measure with no atoms and infinite logarithmic energy; while this result is already known, we are not aware of an explicit example in the literature.
Example B.3**.**
Let be a disjoint sequence of intervals such that the Lebesgue measure . Define a function as follows:
[TABLE]
By construction is non-negative, integrable, and has mass 1, so it is a probability density; let be the measure with density given by . We claim that the (negative) logarithmic energy of is infinite. Indeed,
[TABLE]
Now, since is bounded and has a diffuse component, there exists a bounded, self-adjoint, algebraically free operator with spectral measure . It follows from Proposition 4.10 that , and by Theorem 4.5 we have .
As a decreasing convex function, if ever plateaus it remains constant forever. This happens, for example, when conjugate variables actually exist: for . One may wonder, then, if this behaviour can occur when ; we provide a family of examples to show that it can.
Example B.4**.**
Let where is the semicircle law. Then we will show that if and has spectral measure , then there is so that .
As in the proof of Theorem 4.5, define the functions
[TABLE]
As before, we have a free Stein kernel for relative to given by
[TABLE]
Notice that as , which has ; so it suffices to show that is a free Stein kernel.
Here we will use the fact that to conclude that converges in as . This can be checked by, for example, recognizing that converges in both and : in the former space,
[TABLE]
which converges since is outside the support of ; in the latter,
[TABLE]
where we have used the fact that the Hilbert transform of the semicircle distribution is while is, once again, outside of the support of . Let with the limit in .
We claim that , above, is a free Stein kernel for relative to , whereupon for . (However, note that diverges as .) To see that, notice that is closed since is densely defined. Since with (by virtue of being a free Stein kernel) we therefore have with . That is, is a free Stein kernel for relative to .
One may be tempted to guess that if is a Stein kernel for and is arbitrary that there is some Stein kernel for of the form
[TABLE]
This is true when or when is free from . However, this does not happen in general.
Example B.5**.**
Let be any measure which is diffuse and so that . Note that is diffuse as is and so ; we will show that there is no element of the form .
Notice that because and generate the same algebra, the map from Proposition 3.4 provides a bijection between the closures of the free Stein kernels. In particular, if then , and every element is of this form. Hence if were to be in the domain of , we would have , which is absurd, as we would then have .
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[Ati 76] Michael F. Atiyah, Elliptic operators, discrete groups and von Neumann algebras , 43–72. Astérisque, No. 32–33. MR 0420729
- 2[BM 18] Marwa Banna and Tobias Mai, Hölder Continuity of Cumulative Distribution Functions for Noncommutative Polynomials under Finite Free Fisher Information , Ar Xiv e-prints (2018).
- 3[CFM 18] Guillaume Cébron, Max Fathi, and Tobias Mai, A note on existence of free Stein kernels , ar Xiv e-prints (2018), ar Xiv:1811.02926.
- 4[CG 86] Jeff Cheeger and Mikhael Gromov, L 2 subscript 𝐿 2 L_{2} -cohomology and group cohomology , Topology 25 (1986), no. 2, 189–215. MR 837621
- 5[CS 05] Alain Connes and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko, L 2 superscript 𝐿 2 L^{2} -homology for von Neumann algebras , J. Reine Angew. Math. 586 (2005), 125–168. MR 2180603 (2007 b:46104)
- 6[CS 16] Ian Charlesworth and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko, Free entropy dimension and regularity of non-commutative polynomials , J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), no. 8, 2274–2292. MR 3539353
- 7[Dab 10] Yoann Dabrowski, A note about proving non- Γ Γ \Gamma under a finite non-microstates free Fisher information assumption , J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010), no. 11, 3662–3674. MR 2606868 (2011 d:46135)
- 8[DL 92] E. Brian Davies and J. Martin Lindsay, Noncommutative symmetric Markov semigroups , Math. Z. 210 (1992), no. 3, 379–411. MR 1171180
