Towards an overall astrometric error budget with MICADO-MCAO
Gabriele Rodeghiero, J\"org Uwe Pott, Davide Massari, Maximilian, Fabricius, Vincent Garrel, Hannes Riechert, Richard Davies, Carmelo, Arcidiacono, Mauro Patti, Fausto Cortecchia, Giuliana Fiorentino, Matteo, Lombini

TL;DR
This paper develops an astrometric error budget for MICADO on the ELT, analyzing optical and mechanical errors to enable high-precision star measurements with adaptive optics.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive error budget model for MICADO's astrometry, considering optical, mechanical, and adaptive optics distortions for improved calibration.
Findings
Optical simulations quantify main astrometric error sources.
Error budget informs calibration strategies for MICADO.
Analysis of opto-mechanical errors relevant to astrometry.
Abstract
MICADO is the Multi-AO Imaging Camera for Deep Observations, and it will be one of the first light instruments of the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT). Doing high precision multi-object differential astrometry behind ELT is particularly effective given the increased flux and small diffraction limit. Thanks to its robust design with fixed mirrors and a cryogenic environment, MICADO aims to provide 50 as absolute differential astrometry (measure star-to-star distances in absolute as units) over a 53" FoV in the range 1.2-2.5 m. Tackling high precision astrometry over large FoV requires Multi Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) and an accurate distortion calibration. The MICADO control scheme relies on the separate calibration of the ELT, MAORY and MICADO systematics and distortions, to ensure the best disentanglement and correction of all the contributions. From a system…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
