Supervised classification via minimax probabilistic transformations
Santiago Mazuelas, Andrea Zanoni, Aritz Perez

TL;DR
This paper introduces linear probabilistic classifiers (LPCs) based on robust risk minimization, which optimize 0-1 loss directly, handle unconstrained rules, and provide performance guarantees, showing competitive results on benchmark datasets.
Contribution
The paper proposes LPCs that optimize 0-1 loss directly using RRM, allowing unconstrained classification rules and efficient learning with theoretical performance bounds.
Findings
LPCs achieve competitive accuracy on benchmark datasets.
LPCs provide finite-sample generalization bounds.
LPCs avoid overfitting through RRM over polyhedral uncertainty sets.
Abstract
Conventional techniques for supervised classification constrain the classification rules considered and use surrogate losses for classification 0-1 loss. Favored families of classification rules are those that enjoy parametric representations suitable for surrogate loss minimization, and low complexity properties suitable for overfitting control. This paper presents classification techniques based on robust risk minimization (RRM) that we call linear probabilistic classifiers (LPCs). The proposed techniques consider unconstrained classification rules, optimize the classification 0-1 loss, and provide performance bounds during learning. LPCs enable efficient learning by using linear optimization, and avoid overffiting by using RRM over polyhedral uncertainty sets of distributions. We also provide finite-sample generalization bounds for LPCs and show their competitive performance with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
