
TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of geodesic duality between spacetime manifolds, where a transformation preserves geodesic structures, and explores its implications for spherically symmetric spacetimes like Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström.
Contribution
It defines geodesic duality, establishes a general framework for diagonal metrics, and applies it to specific spherically symmetric spacetimes.
Findings
Identified conditions for geodesic duality in diagonal metrics.
Constructed geodesic dual spacetimes for Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström.
Demonstrated that geodesic duality preserves geodesic structures under specific transformations.
Abstract
A duality between spacetime manifolds, the geodesic duality, is introduced. Two manifolds are geodesic dual, if the transformation between their metrics is also the transformation between their geodesics. That is, the transformation that transforms the metric to the metric of the dual manifold is also the transformation that transforms the geodesic to the geodesic of the dual manifold. On the contrary, for nondual spacetime manifolds, a geodesic is no longer a geodesic after the transformation between the metrics. We give a general result of the duality between spacetime manifolds with diagonal metrics. The geodesic duality of spherically symmetric spacetime are discussed for illustrating the concept. The geodesic dual spacetime of the Schwarzschild spacetime and the geodesic dual spacetime of the Reissner-Nordstr\"om spacetime are presented.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
11footnotetext: [email protected].
Geodesic dual spacetime
Wen-Du Li
and Wu-Sheng Dai
Abstract
A duality between spacetime manifolds, the geodesic duality, is introduced. Two manifolds are geodesic dual, if the transformation between their metrics is also the transformation between their geodesics. That is, the transformation that transforms the metric to the metric of the dual manifold is also the transformation that transforms the geodesic to the geodesic of the dual manifold. On the contrary, for nondual spacetime manifolds, a geodesic is no longer a geodesic after the transformation between the metrics. We give a general result of the duality between spacetime manifolds with diagonal metrics. The geodesic duality of spherically symmetric spacetime are discussed for illustrating the concept. The geodesic dual spacetime of the Schwarzschild spacetime and the geodesic dual spacetime of the Reissner-Nordström spacetime are presented.
1 Introduction
Geodesics, the trajectory of a free particle, reflects the geometry of spacetime. Generally speaking, a transformation between the metrics of two spacetimes cannot transform the geodesic of one spacetime to the geodesic of another spacetime. In this paper, we show that there exist spacetimes whose geodesics can be transformed to each other by the transformation between the metrics of spacetimes. This is a duality between spacetimes, the geodesic duality.
By spacetime with diagonal metrics, we illustrate the concept of the geodesic duality. The spherically symmetric spacetime is generally discussed. The dual spacetime of the Schwarzschild spacetime and dual spacetime of the Reissner-Nordström spacetime are presented.
Duality bridges superficially different things. An important duality is the AdS/CFT duality [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. There exists dualities between spacetime manifolds and fluids, i.e., the gravity/Fluid dual [6, 7], such as the duality between -dimensional Ricci-flat metrics and -dimensional fluids [8, 9], the geometrical duality of both Brans-Dicke theory and general relativity [10], the duality between the nonlinear equations of boundary fluid and gravity theory [11, 12], the duality between the conformal Navier Stokes equation and the long wavelength solution of gravity [13, 14, 15], the duality between -dimensional Ricci-flat metrics and -dimensional relativistic fluids [16], a dual relation of -dimensional metrics corresponding to -dimensional fluids [17], and the fluid/gravity dual in spacetime with general non-rotating weakly isolated horizons [18]. The gravoelectric duality decomposes the Riemann curvature into electric and magnetic parts and introduces the gravoelectric duality transformation by interchange of active and passive electric parts which amounts to interchange of the Ricci and Einstein tensors. The gravoelectric duality can be used to find the solution of the Einstein equation [19, 20, 21, 22]. Invariances under the gravoelectric duality are also considered [23]. There are various dualities between physical systems, such as the duality between the two-dimensional Ising and planar Heisenberg models to gauge theories in four dimensions [24], the duality between the Higgs-Kibble model and the relativistic hydrodynamics of Freedman coupled to Higgs scalars [25], the quantum equivalence of dual field theories [26], the duality in many-component Ising models in two dimensions on a square lattice [27].
In section 2, we define the concept of the geodesic duality. In section 3, we give a general discussion on the spherically symmetric geodesic dual spacetime. In sections 4 and 5, we give the dual spacetime of the Schwarzschild spacetime and the Reissner-Nordström spacetime.
2 Geodesic duality
The geodesic duality is defined as follows.
*Two manifolds are geodesic dual, if the transformation between their metrics is also the transformation between their geodesics. *
We illustrate the concept of the geodesic duality through examples of spacetime manifolds with diagonal metrics.
A geodesic on an -dimensional manifold is determined by geodesic equations. A geodesic on a manifold, after a transformation between the metrics of two manifolds, will be transformed to a curve on the other manifold. If these two manifolds are geodesic dual, the curve will still be a geodesic.
In the following, we consider the geodesic duality between two spacetime manifolds with diagonal metrics. The idea apples also to more general cases.
geodesic equations, which determine an -dimensional geodesic, have first integrals, say , ,, . Of its first integrals, suppose that first integrals, , , , ,, , are known and one first integral is left unknown. For a diagonal metric
[TABLE]
the geodesic is given by
[TABLE]
where .
Geodesic duality means that after a duality transformation, Eq. (2.2), the geodesic equation of the manifold with the metric (2.1), must also be a geodesic equation of its geodesic dual manifold. The geodesic equation on the dual manifold is still of the form of Eq. (2.2). To obtain the geodesic equation of the dual manifold, we exchange the term with another term in the square root of Eq. (2.2):
[TABLE]
We then arrive at a new equation. Requiring the new equation to be a geodesic equation described by the metric gives a transformation
[TABLE]
determined by
[TABLE]
where is the coordinate of the manifold described by , and is the first integral of the new geodesic equation. Rewriting the new geodesic equation in the form of the geodesic equation (2.2):
[TABLE]
where , we can read out the metric of the dual manifold, , directly. It can be found from Eq. (2.7) that the metric of the dual manifold, , is also diagonal, i.e.,
[TABLE]
The manifold with the metric is the geodesic duality of the manifold with the metric .
In the following, we will illustrate how to solve the duality transformations (2.4) and (2.5) through examples.
It should be emphasized that an -dimensional spacetime has geodesic dual spacetimes. This is because the number of the term is , and then there are ways to exchange the term with the terms .
3 Geodesic duality: spherically symmetric spacetime
In this section, we consider spherically symmetric spacetime.
3.1 Duality transformation
The metric of a spherically symmetric spacetime is of the form
[TABLE]
In the spherical coordinate , , , and then , , , and with and the functions of .
The geodesic equation on spherically symmetric spacetime, by Eq. (2.2), is
[TABLE]
In spherically symmetric cases the geodesic orbit is in a plane, so we can choose , then, and the first integral which is the -component of the angular momentum.
In this case, the only possible exchange in Eq. (2.3) is
[TABLE]
In spherically symmetric cases, only the radial coordinate needs to be considered, so there is only one coordinate transformation
[TABLE]
The duality relation is determined by
[TABLE]
so the duality relation (2.6) is
[TABLE]
Note that the duality relation of the angular coordinate is trivial: .
Now consider the transformation of the angular coordinate. Suppose the transformation is
[TABLE]
Substituting Eq. (3.7) into the geodesic equation (3.2) gives
[TABLE]
If Eq. (3.8) is still a geodesic equation, we must have
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
with a constant.
The geodesic equation on the dual spacetime then can be obtained by submitting the duality relation (3.6) into the geodesic equation (3.2):
[TABLE]
Rewriting the new equation to the standard form of the geodesic equation given by Eq. (2.2),
[TABLE]
we can read out the metric of the dual spacetime:
[TABLE]
where we choose , then , the first integral which is the -component of the angular momentum, and is a constant. Then the metric of the dual manifold is
[TABLE]
which is also spherically symmetric.
We might as well choose the constant
[TABLE]
so that
[TABLE]
Consequently, the duality relation between two geodesics on dual spacetimes can be summarized as
[TABLE]
The geodesic on the spacetime (3.17), Eq. (3.12), can be achieved directly from the geodesic on its geodesic dual spacetime (3.1), Eq. (3.2), through the duality transformation (3.21)-(3.22). This result can be verified directly by substituting the duality transforms (3.21)-(3.22) into the geodesic equation.
3.2 Inverse duality transformation
In addition, the inverse transformations of the duality transformations (3.21) and (3.22) are
[TABLE]
By the transformations (3.23) and (3.24), Eqs. (3.13) and (3.14) become
[TABLE]
Then the geodesic equation (3.12) returns to the geodesic equation (3.2).
3.3 Duality
To sum up, the duality relation between two geodesic dual spacetimes is
[TABLE]
This duality transformation transforms both the metric and the geodesic to that of the dual spacetime.
3.4 Spherical coordinate form
As a complement, we rewrite the above result with explicit spherical coordinates.
The metric (3.1) and the geodesic equation (3.2) under the spherical coordinate, , , , , are
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and with the angular momentum and the energy.
For the dual spacetime, the metric (3.17) and the geodesic equation (3.12) under the spherical coordinate , , , , become
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and with the angular momentum and the energy.
The duality relation here is
[TABLE]
4 Geodesic dual spacetime of Schwarzschild spacetime
For the Schwarzschild spacetime
[TABLE]
the duality transformations (3.6) and (3.10) becomes
[TABLE]
Then the metric of the geodesic dual spacetime of the Schwarzschild spacetime is
[TABLE]
The geodesic equations is
[TABLE]
It can be checked that Eqs. (4.1) and (4.4) satisfy the duality relation (3.36)-(3.38).
5 Geodesic dual spacetime of Reissner-Nordström spacetime
For the Reissner-Nordström spacetime
[TABLE]
the duality transformation (3.6) becomes
[TABLE]
The metric of the geodesic dual spacetime is then
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
Their geodesic equations are
[TABLE]
It can be checked that Eqs. (5.1) and (5.4) satisfy the duality relation (3.36)-(3.38).
6 Conclusions and outlook
In this paper, we introduce a duality between spacetimes. The duality relation transforms both the metrics and the geodesics of two dual spacetimes to each other. When two spacetimes are geodesically dual, their geodesics are related by the duality transformation which also relates the metrics of the spacetimes.
The geodesic dual transformation transforms the geodesic equation to the geodesic equation of the dual spacetime. Furthermore, the transformation that transforms another kinds of dynamical equation to a dynamical equation on another spacetime may lead to a new kind of duality of spacetimes. For example, the geodesic is the trajectory of a free particle on spacetime manifolds, while in quantum theory, various kinds of free particles are described by various kinds of wave equations, scalar particles described by scalar equations, spinor particles described by spinor equations, and so on. This inspires us to seek dualities between spacetimes based on various kinds of wave equations.
The geodesic corresponds only to free particles or free fields. It is worthy to consider the duality relation based on various dynamical equations with interactions. The geodesic is the solution of the geodesic equation. Furthermore, various physical quantities are also solutions of various dynamical equations. It is worthy to consider the duality relies on various physical quantities. For example, for bound states, we can consider the duality relation between bound-state eigenvalues. For scattering, the information of the dynamics is embedded in the scattering phase shift [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35], and we can consider the duality relies on phase shifts.
A further problem is the relation between various physical quantities on dual spacetimes, e.g., the relation between eigenvalue spectra on dual manifolds. In quantum field theory, the physical qualities we are interested in are all spectral functions, such as the partition function (the global heat kernel) and the effective action [36, 37, 38]. The spectra and, then, the spectral function is determined by the field equation on spacetimes, so it is worthy to reveal the relation between the spectra and spectral functions on dual spacetimes.
Acknowledgments
We are very indebted to Dr G. Zeitrauman for his encouragement. This work is supported in part by NSF of China under Grant No. 11575125 and No. 11675119.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Maldacena, The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1997), no. hep-th/9711200 231–252.
- 2[2] E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), no. IASSNS-HEP-98-21 505–532.
- 3[3] E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998) 253–291.
- 4[4] O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity , Physics Reports 323 (2000), no. 3 183–386.
- 5[5] E. D’HOKER and D. Z. Freedman, Supersymmetric gauge theories and the Ad S/CFT correspondence , in Strings, Branes and Extra Dimensions: TASI 2001 , pp. 3–159. World Scientific, 2004.
- 6[6] I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov, and A. Strominger, From Navier-Stokes To Einstein , Journal of High Energy Physics 2012 (2012), no. 7 146.
- 7[7] V. E. Hubeny, The fluid/gravity correspondence: a new perspective on the membrane paradigm , Classical and quantum gravity 28 (2011), no. 11 114007.
- 8[8] G. Compère, P. Mc Fadden, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, The holographic fluid dual to vacuum Einstein gravity , Journal of High Energy Physics 2011 (2011), no. 7 50.
