The product of lattice covolume and discrete series formal dimension: p-adic GL(2)
Lauren C. Ruth

TL;DR
This paper computes the product of lattice covolume and formal dimension for discrete series representations of p-adic GL(2), linking it to von Neumann dimensions via cohomological and group-theoretic methods.
Contribution
It provides a method to explicitly calculate the product of covolume and formal dimension for discrete series in p-adic GL(2), connecting geometric and representation-theoretic invariants.
Findings
The product equals the von Neumann dimension of the representation.
The covolume is derived from Ihara's theorem.
Formal dimensions are based on results by Corwin, Moy, and Sally.
Abstract
Let be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic and residue field of order not divisible by . We show how to calculate the product of the covolume of a torsion-free lattice in and the formal dimension of a discrete series representation of . The covolume comes from a theorem of Ihara, and the formal dimensions are contained in results of Corwin, Moy, and Sally. By a theorem going back to Atiyah, and by triviality of the second cohomology group of a free group, the resulting product is the von Neumann dimension of a discrete series representation considered as a representation of a free group factor.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · advanced mathematical theories
The product of lattice covolume and discrete series formal dimension: -adic
Lauren C. Ruth
Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, 1326 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
Abstract.
Let be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic [math] and residue field of order not divisible by . We show how to calculate the product of the covolume of a torsion-free lattice in and the formal dimension of a discrete series representation of . The covolume comes from a theorem of Ihara, and the formal dimensions are contained in results of Corwin, Moy, and Sally. By a theorem going back to Atiyah, and by triviality of the second cohomology group of a free group, the resulting product is the von Neumann dimension of a discrete series representation considered as a representation of a free group factor.
1. Introduction
The product of the covolume of a lattice and the formal dimension of a discrete series representation is significant in many areas of mathematics: Under various conditions, this product equals the multiplicity of a discrete series representations in square-integrable functions on a symmetric space, the dimension of a space of cusp forms on the upper-half plane, or the size of the commutant of a von Neumann algebra. This note concerns the latter.
In Section 2, we provide background on von Nemann algebras; then we give examples of a theorem of Atiyah in the setting of , observing that the list of examples can be extended if the lattice has trivial second cohomology group; then we explain how a proof of Atiyah’s theorem carries over to the setting of , where is a local nonarchimedean field.
In Section 3, we deal carefully with Haar measure, obtaining the covolume of a lattice from a theorem of Ihara, and, for this same normalization of Haar measure, the formal dimensions of discrete series representations, which were calculated for in a paper of Corwin, Moy, and Sally.
Our result is Example 1.1:
Example 1.1**.**
Let be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic [math] and residue field of order not divisible by . Let be a free group contained as a lattice in . Let be a discrete series representation of . Then we have the following list of von Neumann dimensions for each as a representation of the II1 factor :
[TABLE]
This extends the list of von Neumann dimensions in the setting of in [Rut18], where only the Steinberg representation and just one supercuspidal representation were considered.
Compare this list of von Neumann dimensions for representations of free group factors to the list in Example 2.5 in the setting of . The difference between the two lists is due to the difference between the parametrizations of the discrete series representations of and .
2. Background
2.1. Von Neumann dimension
A von Neumann algebra is a self-adjoint unital subalgebra of bounded linear operators on complex Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology. A factor is a von Neumann algebra whose center consists only of scalars. A finite factor is a factor possessing a (unique) faithful weakly continuous trace. These are the factors of Type In, which are isomorphic to , and of Type II1, of which we will now give an example. A discrete subgroup of a locally compact unimodular group is called a lattice if supports a finite Haar measure; and by Borel’s density theorem, any lattice in a centerless semisimple Lie group without compact simple factors has this property ([GdlHJ89] Lemma 3.3.1). Let be such a lattice, and denote by the closure with respect to the weak operator topology of the right regular representation of on . Then is a II1 factor ([Sak98] Lemma 4.2.18).
While the normalized trace on a Type In factor assumes values in on projections, the normalized trace on a Type II1 factor assumes all values in on projections. This leads to the continuous von Neumann dimension of modules over II1 factors. When Murray and von Neumann defined this dimension in [MVN36], they called it the “coupling constant,” because it measures the size of a factor’s commutant on a given representation space. Representations of a II1 factor are classified up to unitary equivalence by their von Neumann dimension: Given a representation, one can obtain a representation of any von Neumann dimension in by applying an amplification and a projection. Atiyah used this notion of von Neumann dimension to define -Betti numbers in [Ati76], and Theorem 2.1 below is an outgrowth of his work on index theory.
2.2. Formal dimensions of discrete series representations
We call an irreducible unitary representation of a connected semisimple Lie group (e.g. ) a discrete series representation if one (hence all) of its matrix coefficients are square-integrable. Such a representation is equivalent to a subrepresentation of the right regular representation of on ([Rob83], 16.2 Theorem). Discrete series representations behave like irreducible unitary representations of compact groups, in the sense that they have a formal dimension, a constant d such that Schur’s relations hold:
[TABLE]
Consider , where is any local field. Similar to the definition above, we call an irreducible unitary representation of a discrete series representation if one (hence all) of its matrix coefficients , , are square-integrable modulo the center of . In this setting, the formal dimension dπ is again defined by Schur’s relations:
[TABLE]
2.3. Motivating theorem and examples
The following theorem has its roots in Atiyah’s work on -index in [Ati76] and in Atiyah and Schmid’s geometric realizations of discrete series representations of semisimple Lie groups in [AS77].
Theorem 2.1**.**
([GdlHJ89] Theorem 3.3.2) Let be a connected semisimple real Lie group having discrete series representations, let be a lattice in , and let be a discrete series representation. Assume that every non-trivial conjugacy class of has infinitely many elements. Then the representation restricted to extends to a representation of the II1 factor , with von Neumann dimension given by
[TABLE]
where denotes the formal dimension of .
Let us give examples. Let , and let be a Fuchsian group of the first kind. By a theorem of Fricke and Klein (Proposition 2.4 in [Iwa97]), is isomorphic to a group having generators
[TABLE]
satisfying the relations
[TABLE]
The area of a fundamental domain for the action of by linear fractional transformations on the upper half-plane with respect to the measure is given by the Gauss–Bonnet formula (pg. 33 of [Iwa97]),
[TABLE]
Let be the Iwasawa decomposition of , and normalize Haar measure so that . Then .
With respect to this same Haar measure, the list of formal dimensions of discrete series representations of is
[TABLE]
The calculation of formal dimensions is part of 17.8 Theorem in [Rob83], and the Haar measure normalization is discussed at the top of pg. 148 of [GdlHJ89].
From the construction in Section 17 of [Rob83], one sees that the discrete series representations of factoring through are those indexed by even . (For odd , acts as multiplication by .) So we have the following example.
Example 2.2**.**
Let , let be a Fuchsian group of the first kind in , and let be a discrete series representation of , by which we mean a discrete series representation of that factors through — so, must be even. Then the conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied, and we have a representation of on of von Neumann dimension
[TABLE]
where we have used formulas (3) and (4), with as in (1) and (2).
Remark 2.3**.**
Suppose moreover that has trivial second cohomology group. Then there is no need to restrict to be even: If is a projective representation of coming from a representation of , then the 2-cocycle associated to the restriction of the projective representation to is trivial, so we have a true representation of on , and this representation extends to a representation of the II1 factor .
Example 2.4**.**
([GdlHJ89] Example 3.3.4) Suppose is the free product of cyclic groups , where , which has , , , in 1 and 2. Then by Remark 2.3, we may start with representations of , even though is in , and we have
[TABLE]
Example 2.5**.**
Suppose in Example 2.2, we take to be a free group , which has , no , in 1 and 2. Then by Remark 2.3, we may start with representations of , even though is in , and we have
[TABLE]
2.4. Corollary to a proof of Theorem 2.1
The main ingredients of the proof in [GdlHJ89] of Theorem 2.1 are a locally compact unimodular group and a lattice in satisfying the following criteria:
- (i)
has the property that every one of its non-trivial conjugacy classes has infinitely many elements, and
- (ii)
has an irreducible unitary representation that is equivalent to a subrepresentation of the right regular representation.
When combined with Remark 2.3 on projective representations, the proof of Theorem 2.1 gives Corollary 2.6:
Corollary 2.6**.**
Let be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic [math], let be a lattice in , and let be a discrete series representation. Assume that every non-trivial conjugacy class of has infinitely many elements. Then provided that has trivial second cohomology group, the restriction to of the projective representation of obtained from the representation of gives a representation of on that extends to a representation of the II1 factor , with von Neumann dimension given by
[TABLE]
where denotes the formal dimension of .
3. Computations
Notation
If is a nonarchimedean local field, let denote its integers, let denote the maximal (prime) ideal of , let denote a prime element, so that , let denote the order of the residue field, so that , and define the groups
[TABLE]
3.1. Computing covolumes of torsion-free lattices in
Theorem 3.1**.**
([Iha66] Theorem 1 and Corollary) Let be a local nonarchimedean field. Any torsion-free discrete subgroup is isomorphic to a free group on at most countably many generators. If moreover is compact, then the number of free generators of is given by
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Lemma 3.2**.**
Let be as in Theorem 3.1, and let be the number of it generators. If Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
Proof.
If Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
which by Theorem 3.1 is equal to
[TABLE]
Covolume scales proportionally with Haar measure, so if Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
∎
3.2. Computing formal dimensions of discrete series representations of
The calculation of formal dimensions of discrete series representations of is already contained in the paper of Corwin, Moy, and Sally [CMS90], in which the authors calculate formal dimensions of discrete series representations of , where is relatively prime to , using Howe’s notion of an admissible character of an extension of degree over . Here, we will carry out their same calculation in the notation of Bushnell and Henniart’s book on [BH06], for the benefit of readers who may be unfamiliar with representation theory of -adic groups, in case they wish to consult the book [BH06] for more details.
Note that there are no Hilbert spaces in [BH06]. But by Section 2 of [Car79], the irreducible smooth representations of in [BH06] admit completions to the irreducible unitary representations of that we need for Corollary 2.6.
Let and let . Let denote the center of , which we may identify with .
Let be a chain order in . Then either
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
Let denote the Jacobson radical of , . There exists an element such that . So either
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
We define the groups
[TABLE]
For example,
[TABLE]
The surjection induces the maps
[TABLE]
The normalizer of in is
[TABLE]
We now describe the discrete series representations of : the Steinberg representation (and its twists by characters), and the supercuspidal representations.
The Steinberg representation of is induced from the trivial character on the subgroup of upper-triangular matrices in . This representation is shown to be square-integrable modulo in 17.5-17.9 of [BH06]. Twists of the Steinberg representation by characters of are also square-integrable modulo .
Lemma 3.3**.**
If Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then the formal dimension of the Steinberg representation is
[TABLE]
Proof.
We start from the last line of the proof that the Steinberg representation is square-integrable modulo in [BH06], 17.5 Theorem, where Haar measure on is normalized so that vol. We need the group
[TABLE]
(This group appears because a set of coset representatives for is given by the group , where ; see [BH06] 17.1 Theorem.) Expanding a geometric series, using the fact that lengths of elements of are , we have
[TABLE]
Because the matrix coefficient is equal to when , we see that if Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then the formal dimension of the Steinberg representation is
[TABLE]
Counting elements of the finite groups in the tower of surjections (6) gives
[TABLE]
Formal dimension is inversely proportional to Haar measure, so if Haar measure on is normalized such that
[TABLE]
which is equivalent to normalizing Haar measure on such that
[TABLE]
then the formal dimension of the Steinberg representation is
[TABLE]
∎
Remark 3.4**.**
Lemma 3.3 above agrees with equation (2.2.2) in [CMS90], which says
[TABLE]
where St denotes the Steinberg representation of , and is a maximal compact subgroup of .
A supercuspidal representation of is an irreducible unitary representation of that is not equivalent to a subrepresentation of any representation induced from a character on the subgroup of upper-triangular matrices obtained by inflating a character on the subgroup of diagonal matrices. These are shown to have matrix coefficients that are compactly supported (hence square-integrable) modulo in 10.1-10.2 in [BH06]. All supercuspidal representations of are “compactly induced” from irreducible finite-dimensional representations of certain open subgroups of that contain and are compact modulo ([BH06] 20.2 Theorem). The matrix coefficients of the compactly induced representations are essentially those of the inducing representations (an observation of Mautner in [Mau64]), which leads to Proposition 3.5 below.
Proposition 3.5**.**
([KR14] Proposition 1.2) Let be a supercuspidal representation of compactly induced from an irreducible representation of , where and is compact in .Then the formal dimension of is given by
[TABLE]
We start by describing the simplest supercuspidal representation of and calculating its formal dimension.
Example 3.6**.**
A cuspidal representation of is an irreducible representation of on a (finite-dimensional) complex vector space that is not equivalent to a subrepresentation of any representation induced from a character on upper-triangular matrices obtained by inflating a character on diagonal matrices; all these representations have dimension ([PS83] Proposition 10.2, or [Bum97] Proposition 4.1.5). Let be a cuspidal representation of . Inflate this representation of to a representation of trivial on , then compactly induce from to a representation of . This is a supercuspidal representation of ([BH06] 11.5 Theorem (1), or [Bum97] Theorem 4.8.1) .
Lemma 3.7**.**
If Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then the formal dimension of the supercuspidal representation in Example 3.6 is
[TABLE]
Proof.
From Proposition 3.5,
[TABLE]
∎
We now describe the other supercuspidal representations and show how to compute their formal dimensions.
Let be a compact open subgroup of , and let be the finite-dimensional representation from which the supercuspidal representation of will be induced. From Sections 15-16 of [BH06], is of the form
[TABLE]
where is an extension of of degree ; if is ramified, and if is unramified; and . Note is contained in , and contains and is compact modulo . Each supercuspidal representation of besides the supercuspidal representation constructed in Example 3.6 corresponds to one of the following pairs of and :
[TABLE]
We now calculate the formal dimensions of these supercuspidal representations. This amounts to calculating vol, which will be calculated from the index of in .
Remark 3.8**.**
We would like to emphasize that the calculations in Lemma 3.9 and Lemma 3.10 below are already contained in [CMS90]. All we are doing here is specializing to the case and using the notation of [BH06].
Lemma 3.9**.**
Let be an integer. We have
- (i)
**
- (ii)
**
- (iii)
**
- (iv)
**
- (v)
**
where and if and is unramified; and and if and is ramified.
Proof.
For (i), count the elements of the finite groups in the tower of surjections (6).
For (ii), use
[TABLE]
For (iii), note
[TABLE]
For (iv), use
[TABLE]
For (v), note
[TABLE]
∎
Lemma 3.10**.**
[TABLE]
where and if and is unramified; and and if and is ramified.
Proof.
We have
[TABLE]
and plugging in Lemma 3.9 (i)-(iv) gives the result. ∎
Lemma 3.11**.**
If Haar measure on is normalized so that
[TABLE]
then the volumes of and the formal dimensions of the supercuspidal representations compactly induced by each in the previous table are given by the additional columns:
[TABLE]
where .
Proof.
First,
[TABLE]
Case 1: is unramified, so , , and . From Lemma 3.9 (v),
[TABLE]
and from Lemma 3.10,
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
Case 2: is ramified, so , , and . From Lemma 3.9 (v) and the tower of surjections (6),
[TABLE]
and from Lemma 3.10,
[TABLE]
so
[TABLE]
Dividing dim by these volumes according to Proposition 3.5 completes the table. ∎
Remark 3.12**.**
These formal dimensions agree with the formal dimensions in Theorem 2.2.8 of [CMS90] for .
3.3. Proof of Example 1.1
Using the formula in Corollary 2.6, we may multiply the covolumes in Lemma 3.2 by the formal dimensions in Lemma 3.3, Lemma 3.7, Lemma 3.11 to obtain the list of von Neumann dimensions in Example 1.1.
4. Concluding remarks
4.1. Related directions
In [Rut18], formulas for dimensions of spaces of cusp forms were combined with Theorem 2.1 to obtain representations of the II1 factor on subspaces of , where , and and are lattices in . In [Rut], we will compile a list of situations where the pointwise limit multiplicity has been proven to hold, thereby obtaining representations of a II1 factor on subspaces of for many other groups , including and .
4.2. Further questions
Question 1**.**
Ihara’s Theorem 3.1 only concerns torsion-free lattices in . What about lattices in , ? If we knew the covolumes of these lattices, we could extend Example 1.1 using the rest of the formal dimensions in [CMS90]. (We are not asking about lattice covolume in , , because has discrete series representations only for .)
Question 2**.**
contains lattices that, unlike free groups, do not have trivial second cohomology group, e.g. lattices isomorphic to , where is a compact Riemann surface. Could it be that the restriction to of a 2-cocycle associated to a projective representation of arising from a representation of is trivial anyway? What is the relationship between central extensions of an algebraic group on the one hand, and central extensions of its lattices on the other?
Question 3**.**
Is it possible to construct representations of II1 factors using principal series representations, rather than discrete series representations? The proof of Theorem 2.1 relies crucially on the fact that discrete series representations occur discretely in the right regular representation, so the method does not carry over to principal series representations, which occur continuously.
Question 4**.**
The index of a subfactor is defined as the ratio of two von Neumann dimensions: Data about the “size” of the representation space cancels out, leaving data about the subfactor inclusion. Vaughan Jones showed in [Jon83] that the index of a subfactor in a II1 factor can only assume values in the set
[TABLE]
and he gave an example of a factor in which all these subfactor indices are achieved. For a given lattice in or , what subset of these index values is achieved in ? Does the answer depend upon whether or ?
Acknowledgments
We thank Alain Valette, A. Raghuram, Moshe Adrian, Allen Moy, and Vaughan Jones for enlightening conversations and correspondence. We are especially grateful to Vaughan Jones for Remark 2.3. This work would not have been possible without the workshop and conference on representation theory of -adic groups at IISER Pune during July 2017 and the Hausdorff Trimester Program on von Neumann algebras in Bonn during Summer 2016; we thank the organizers for the opportunity to have attended these events.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[AS 77] Michael Atiyah and Wilfried Schmid, A geometric construction of the discrete series for semisimple lie groups , Inventiones mathematicae 42 (1977), 1–62.
- 2[Ati 76] M. F. Atiyah, Elliptic operators, discrete groups and von Neumann algebras , 43–72. Astérisque, No. 32–33. MR 0420729
- 3[BH 06] Colin J. Bushnell and Guy Henniart, The local Langlands conjecture for GL ( 2 ) GL 2 \rm GL(2) , Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 335, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. MR 2234120
- 4[Bum 97] Daniel Bump, Automorphic forms and representations , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997. MR 1431508
- 5[Car 79] P. Cartier, Representations of p 𝑝 p -adic groups: a survey , Automorphic forms, representations and L 𝐿 L -functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1979, pp. 111–155. MR 546593
- 6[CMS 90] Lawrence Corwin, Allen Moy, and Paul J. Sally, Jr., Degrees and formal degrees for division algebras and GL n subscript GL 𝑛 {\rm GL}_{n} over a p 𝑝 p -adic field , Pacific J. Math. 141 (1990), no. 1, 21–45. MR 1028263
- 7[Gdl HJ 89] Frederick M. Goodman, Pierre de la Harpe, and Vaughan F. R. Jones, Coxeter graphs and towers of algebras , Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 14, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. MR 999799
- 8[Iha 66] Yasutaka Ihara, On discrete subgroups of the two by two projective linear group over 𝔭 𝔭 \mathfrak{p} -adic fields , J. Math. Soc. Japan 18 (1966), 219–235. MR 0223463
