Solvable model of bound states in the continuum (BIC) in one dimension
Zafar Ahmed, Sachin Kumar, Dona Ghosh, Tarit Goswami

TL;DR
This paper introduces an exactly solvable one-dimensional potential model exhibiting bound states in the continuum (BIC), revealing novel discrete states within a continuum and complex scattering solutions.
Contribution
It presents the first exactly solvable 1D BIC model with unique discrete states and complex scattering solutions, advancing understanding of BIC phenomena in lower dimensions.
Findings
Existence of discrete, square-integrable, non-degenerate states within the continuum.
Presence of complex scattering solutions with ambiguous parity.
An exactly solvable bottomless exponential potential model.
Abstract
Historically, most of the quantum mechanical results have originated in one dimensional model potentials. However, Von-Neumann's Bound states in the Continuum (BIC) originated in specially constructed, three dimensional, oscillatory, central potentials. One dimensional version of BIC has long been attempted, where only quasi-exactly-solvable models have succeeded but not without instigating degeneracy in one dimension. Here, we present an exactly solvable bottomless exponential potential barrier which for has a continuum of non-square-integrable, definite-parity, degenerate states. In this continuum, we show a surprising presence of discrete energy, square-integrable, definite-parity, non-degenerate states. For , there is again a continuum of complex scattering solutions whose real and imaginary parts though solutions of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Solvable model of bound states in the continuum (BIC) in one dimension
Zafar Ahmed1,2, Sachin Kumar3, Dona Ghosh4, and Tarit Goswami5
1Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400 094,India
3Theoretical Physics Section, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India
4Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India
5Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jalpaiguri Govt. Engineering College, Jalpaiguri, WB 735102, India
1:[email protected], 2:sachinv.barc.gov.in, 3:[email protected], 4:[email protected]
Abstract
Historically, most of the quantum mechanical results have originated in one dimensional model potentials. However, Von-Neumann’s Bound states in the Continuum (BIC) originated in specially constructed, three dimensional, oscillatory, central potentials. One dimensional version of BIC has long been attempted, where only quasi-exactly-solvable models have succeeded but not without instigating degeneracy in one dimension. Here, we present an exactly solvable bottomless exponential potential barrier which for has a continuum of non-square-integrable, definite-parity, degenerate states. In this continuum, we show a surprising presence of discrete energy, square-integrable, definite-parity, non-degenerate states. For , there is again a continuum of complex scattering solutions whose real and imaginary parts though solutions of Schrödinger equation yet their parities cannot be ascertained as is also a solution where is an arbitrary complex non-real number.
In three dimensions, specially constructed spatially oscillating central potentials are known to possess discrete energy Bound states in the Continuum (BIC) which are called Von-Neumann states [1]. Though it started as a mathematical curiosity, later [2] these states have been realized in physical systems.
BIC have been studied mainly in optics [3]. In a photonic system consisting of two parallel dielectric gratings and two arrays of thin parallel dielectric cylinders [4], It has been shown that the interaction between trapped electromagnetic modes can lead to BIC. Such photonic systems find many applications in optics, such as amplification of electromagnetic fields within the photonic structures. Recently, the simultaneous occurrence of two fundamentally different phenomena, the BIC and the spectral singularity (time-reversed spectral singularity) has been achieved in a rectangular core dielectric waveguide with an embedded absorbing layer [5]. Two distinct types of optical BIC existing in broken and unbroken PT phase have also been classified in PT-symmetric optical waveguides [6]. A recent review article describing the possible experimental realizations and existing applications of BIC is also worth mentioning [7]. BIC can exist for electrons in solids. Electronic BIC has been proposed and studied in Condensed matter physics, They appear as points/lines in the momentum space and protected by the topological invariants [8,9]. The existence of BIC has been theoretically demonstrated as well in a quantum-dot system, in which BIC appear due to Fabry-Perot interference between the quasibound states of each dot [10], further an encryption device based on BIC has been theoretically investigated in a topological Kitaev chain connected to a double quantum-dot structure [11]. In Ref. [12] authors have studied the BIC in hermitian tight bonding models, and shown that the transformation of a scattering state into a BIC can be formally described as a “phase transition” with a divergent generalized response function. A new type of Quantum phase transition triggering the magnetic BIC has been proposed [13] in graphene. The interplay between spin-orbit coupling and Zeeman splitting in atomic systems leading to the existence of BIC has been shown [14]. In Ref. [15] authors have analyzed strong coupling between excitons in transition metal dichalcogenides and optical BIC. Analytic solution of BIC for photons and atoms in a one-dimensional coupled-cavity array has been presented in [16]. Most recently, dynamic control of a BIC has been demonstrated in the dielectric meta-surfaces [17].
The link between the BIC and the Fano anomaly [18] in the transmission spectra is another interesting phenomenon which has been investigated very well [19].
For a long time one-dimensional version of BIC has been tried and the present work addresses this issue mainly. Very interestingly, in single channel, time-reversely symmetric quasi-one dimensional systems, surprising transmission-zeros have been observed earlier [19]. Here, we will have a new opportunity to see if this can also happen in a purely one dimensional system also.
Earlier, an interesting symmetric stair-case like potential called pyramid barrier [20] has been purported to be giving rise to BIC. However, a usual study of scattering from such a potential reveals that the pyramid potential cannot act any different from the rectangular barrier as both of them are bounded from below. By making these potentials very high or by making them large negative on both sides, the uniform amplitude of asymptotic oscillations in the scattering state can be made very small but not zero. So all the states in these two simple potentials remain scattering states which are non-square-integrable. For higher order solvable models [21] of bottomless potentials like parabolic and triangular barriers, scattering solutions of Schrödinger equation do vanish asymptotically yet they are not square-integrable. For instance for the parabolic barrier [21].
Later, investigations on Quasi-Exactly-Solvable (QES) 1D potentials have revealed [22-25] surprising results that two square integrable states can exist at one real energy in or above a bottomless barrier . This means a bound state exists even without two real turning points or it exists in a double barrier with four real turning points at where one usually expects [26] a complex energy resonance to occur. They even suggest a degeneracy at in one dimension.
In this paper, we study the possibility of bound states in the bottomless exponential barrier ( See Fig. 1(a))
[TABLE]
This is so far the third bottomless potential which is exactly solvable. Its solutions are possible in terms of well known cylindrical Hankel and Bessel functions, its reflection and transmission coefficients have been obtained and studied recently [27] (see Fig. 1(b,c)). It is capable of raising some interesting issues which are un-noticed so far. Here, we show an existence of continuum of non-square-integrable degenerate states of definite parity in or above the exponential potential (1) for energies . Next we show the surprising presence of discrete energy, square-integrable, definite-parity, non-degenerate states embedded in the said continuum of energies.
The Schrödinger equation
[TABLE]
and , for this potential can be transformed to cylindrical Bessel equation [27] to get two linearly independent solutions:
[TABLE]
These two solutions oscillate and vanish asymptotically. From these two solutions we construct two even and odd parity solutions such that and . These two definite parity degenerate solutions for any energy in the continuum of energies when integer are
[TABLE]
where . Integer values of are the curious energies where the two linearly independent solutions (3) become linearly dependent, the states in (4) become identically zero. Only usual scattering states [27] exist at these energies, and remain finite see Figs. 1(b,c). It must be remarked that for energies all the solutions of (1) are complex scattering states in terms of complex Hankel functions [27] whose real and imaginary parts will be of definite-parity only at some special energies. But then real and imaginary parts of a complex function become ambiguous if an arbitrary complex (non-real) number multiplies it. For instance, let where and are of definite parities and let where and are real and arbitrary. Then have definite parities but and will not have definite parities.
In Ref. [25], for , similar solutions as in (4) have been sought in order to bring out degenerated bound states in one dimension. Here, we remark that by virtue of the following integral [26]
[TABLE]
divergent otherwise; is square-integrable but is not so. Consequently, the degenerate states in (4) are not square-integrable and they can form only a continuum of degenerate scattering states, as it should be.
Next, we look for the square integrable states in (1) by admitting the solution . Since the potential is symmetric, we seek two separate definite parity solutions at two different energies as
[TABLE]
We claim that these are square-integrable, definite-parity, non-degenerate states of (1) which are embedded in the energy continuum . In Fig. 2, we plot and (See Eq. (6)) as functions of energy to demonstrate their five number of zeros. This potential barrier therefore has five non-degenerate discrete energy states at which are alternatingly of even and odd parities.
In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), the first even and the first odd parity BICs have been plotted for the case when and . These states look curious bound states due to their numerous uncontrollable nodes. However, their knowledge could be worthwhile. It will be well to recall that even in 3D a BIC [1,2] has uncontrollable but fewer number of nodes.
A very interesting QES bottomless double barrier [24] has five real discrete energy eigenvalues known which lay in and above the well and the corresponding eigenstates are complex square-integrable scattering states such as . The flux carried by them is non-zero, constant and energy-independent signifying a reflectionless state moving from one side to the other. The real and imaginary parts of these states are definite-parity degenerated bound states at one energy.
Similarly, the first revelation [22] of the degenerated states in single or double bottomless barrier is also based on the reflectionless states such as and Therefore, the reflectionless states and the ensuing potential are connected [24] to the surprising existence of degeneracy in one dimension.
The structureless variation of and [27] as depicted in fig. 1(b,c) here rules out a possibility of transmission-zeros which have been observed in quasi-one dimensional structures [19]. The special integral values of when (see Eq. (4)) did appear curious in this regard when , but we find that ordinary tunnelling occurs at these energies and is non-zero and finite even at these energies.
In one dimension, we predict that simple bottomless potentials could easily be the models which will support square integrable, discrete energy, definite parity states above the barrier; They may be either degenerate or non-degenerate. In such cases, for asymptotic distances the energy being negligible the Schrödinger equation becomes . Its solutions are whose asymptotic form works to . Further, for the square-integrability of we require . But unfortunately even these simple models are not solvable analytically.
In this regard, the exponential barrier considered here like the parabolic and triangular barrier has the usual feature of not possessing reflectionlessness at any energy (see Fig. 1(b)) and hence it does not display degeneracy. The simple bottomless barrier [29] has been found to have real positive discrete energies where reflectivity of the barrier is zero. This potential is not analytically solvable and it would require special methods to check if at those reflectivity zeros it has degenerated bound states. Such a study is most welcome. In three dimensions, even a solitary BIC has several nodes and the ensuing potential is oscillatory, but in one dimension the BIC has numerous nodes and the underlying potential is non-oscillatory. It may be remarked that the reported [22] degenerate bound states at in QES potentials may also be suspiciously interesting as one may wonder if the same happens, as well, at a nearby energy leading to the formation of a continuum of such states. Lastly, we would like to re-emphasize that the bottomless exponential potential is the first exactly solvable model of BIC in one dimension. We hope that the present work will generate further interest in BIC in one dimension and the knowledge of such states could be at least worthwhile for a basic interest.
References
- (1) J. Von-Neumann and E. P. Wigner 1929, Z. Phys. 30, 465.
- (2) F. H. Stillinger and D. R. Herrick 1975, Phys. Rev. A 11, 446;
N. Meyer-Vernet 1982, Am. J. Phys. 50, 354;
F. Capasso, C. Sirtori, J. Faist, D. Sivco, S. Chu and A.Y. Cho 1992, Nature 358, 565;
M. Arai and J. Uchiyama 1999, J. Diff. Eqns. 157, 348;
- (3) A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, B. Kante, 2017, Nature 541(7636), 196;
Y. Plotnik, O. Peleg, F. Dreisow, M. Heinrich, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 183901
- (4) D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 183902
- (5) B. Midya and V. V. Konotop 2018, Opt. Lett. 43 607
- (6) S. Longhi, 2014, Opt. Lett. 39, 1697
- (7) C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D Stone, J. D. Jannnopoulos and M. Soljacic, 2016, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 16048
- (8) B. J. Yang, M. S. Bahramy, and N. Nagaosa, 2013, Nat. Commun. 4 1524
- (9) M. Takeichi and S. Murakami 2019, Phys. Rev. B 99 035128
- (10) G. Ordonez, K. Na, and S. Kim, 2006, Phys. Rev. A 73 022113
- (11) L. H. Guessi, F. A. Dessotti, Y. Marques, L. S. Ricco, G. M. Pereira, P. Menegasso, M. de Souza, and A. C. Seridonio, 2017, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041114 .
- (12) A. A. Gorbatsevich and N. M. Shubin 2017, Phys. Rev. B 96 205441
- (13) L. H. Guessi, Y. Marques, R. S. Machado, K. Kristinsson, L. S. Ricco, I. A. Shelykh, M. S. Figueira, M. de Souza, and A. C. Seridonio, 2015, Phys. Rev. B 92 245107
- (14) Yaroslav V. Kartashov, Vladimir V. Konotop, and Lluis Torner, 2017, Phys. Rev. A 96, 033619
- (15) K. L. Koshelev, S. K. Sychev, Z. F. Sadrieva, A. A. Bogdanov, and I. V. Iorsh, 2018, Phys. Rev. B 98, 161113(R)
- (16) P. T. Fong and C. K. Law, 2017, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023842
- (17) K. Fan, I. V. Shadrivov, and W. J. Padilla, 2019, Optica 6.2 169
- (18) A A. Bogdanov, K. L. Koshelev, P. V. Kapitanova, M. V. Rybin, S. A. Gladyshev, Z. F. Sadrieva, K. B. Samusev, Y. S. Kivshar, and M. F. Limonov, 2019, Advanced Photonics 1.1 016001; arXiv: 1805.09265
- (19) H-W. Lee, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett 82 2358.
- (20) B. N. Zakhariev and A. A. Suzo 1998, Direct and Inverse Problems: Potentials in Quantum Scattering (Springer-Verlag: N.Y.); A. A. Suzo 1985, Phys. Scrip. 31 447.
- (21) D. R. Bates 1961, Quantum Theory(I Elements) (Academic Press, New York), pp. 238-242.
- (22) S. Kar and R. R. Parwani 2007, Eur. Phys. Lett. 80 30004.
- (23) H-T. Cho and C-L. Ho 2008, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 172002.
- (24) H-T. Cho and C-L. Ho 2008, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 255308.
- (25) A. Demic, V. Milanovic , J. Radovanovic and M. Music 2016, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 30 1650003.
- (26) E. Merzbacher 1970, Quantum Mechanics (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York), edition; A. Dutt and S. Kar 2010, Am. J. Phys. 78
- (27) Z. Ahmed, D. Ghosh, S. Kumar, N. Turumella 2018, Eur. J. Phys. 39 025404.
- (28) Wolfram Mathematica. Here is the regularized hypergeometric function.
- (29) Z. Ahmed, C. M. Bender and M. V. Berry 2005, J. Phys. A: Math. & Gen. 38 L627.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) J. Von-Neumann and E. P. Wigner 1929, Z. Phys. 30 , 465.
- 2(2) F. H. Stillinger and D. R. Herrick 1975, Phys. Rev. A 11 , 446; N. Meyer-Vernet 1982, Am. J. Phys. 50 , 354; F. Capasso, C. Sirtori, J. Faist, D. Sivco, S. Chu and A.Y. Cho 1992, Nature 358 , 565; M. Arai and J. Uchiyama 1999, J. Diff. Eqns. 157 , 348;
- 3(3) A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, B. Kante, 2017, Nature 541(7636) , 196; Y. Plotnik, O. Peleg, F. Dreisow, M. Heinrich, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 183901
- 4(4) D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 183902
- 5(5) B. Midya and V. V. Konotop 2018, Opt. Lett. 43 607
- 6(6) S. Longhi, 2014, Opt. Lett. 39 , 1697
- 7(7) C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D Stone, J. D. Jannnopoulos and M. Soljacic, 2016, Nature Reviews Materials 1 , 16048
- 8(8) B. J. Yang, M. S. Bahramy, and N. Nagaosa, 2013, Nat. Commun. 4 1524
