
TL;DR
This paper investigates Severi type inequalities for big line bundles on irregular varieties, linking them to birational invariants of fibers and deriving bounds on volumes and structural properties of such varieties.
Contribution
It introduces new Severi type inequalities for irregular varieties using cohomological rank functions and relates these to birational invariants of fibers, providing bounds and structural insights.
Findings
New lower bounds for volumes of irregular threefolds
Sharp bounds for varieties of maximal Albanese dimension and general type
Canonical models are flat double covers of abelian varieties branched over divisors
Abstract
We study Severi type inequalities for big line bundles on irregular varieties via cohomological rank functions. We show that these Severi type inequalities on an irregular variety are related to some natural defined birational invariants of a general fiber of the Albanese morphism of . As applications, we provide a new lower bound of volumes of irregular threefolds, a sharp lower bound of varieties of maximal Albanese dimension and of general type, and show that the canonical model of such a variety with the minimal volume should be a flat double covers of a principally polarized abelian variety branched over .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Geometry and complex manifolds
On Severi type inequalities
Zhi Jiang
Shanghai center for mathematical sciences, Xingjiangwan campus, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, P. R. China
Abstract.
We study Severi type inequalities for big line bundles on irregular varieties via cohomological rank functions. We show that these Severi type inequalities are related to some natural defined birational invariants of the general fibers of the Albanese morphisms. As an application, we show that the volume of an irregular threefold of general type is at least . We also show that the volume of a smooth projective variety of general type and of maximal Albanese dimension is at least . Moreover, if , the canonical model of is a flat double cover of a principally polarized abelian variety branched over some divisor .
The author is partially supported by the program “Recruitment of global experts”, NSFC grants No. 11871155 and No. 11731004.
1. Introduction
Xiao proved an inequality among certain Chern numbers for surfaces with fibrations to curves ([X]), which is now called Xiao’s slope inequality. Assume that is a relatively minimal and not locally trivial fibration from a smooth projective surface to a smooth curve. Let be the genus of a general fiber of and let be the genus of . Then Xiao showed that
[TABLE]
Note that is a birational invariant of . If is minimal surface, then and we can rewrite Xiao’s inequality as an inequality between birational invariants:
[TABLE]
This inequality played an essential role in Pardini’s proof of Severi’s inequality of surfaces ([Par]). Assume that is a surface of general type, of maximal Albanese dimension, then . Indeed, Pardini noticed that one can construct étale covers such that and and fibrations such that the genus of a general fiber of is , for each . Applying Xiao’s equality for these fibrations , Pardini proved that , which is called Severi’s inequality.
Severi’s inequality was extended to varieties of maximal Albanese dimensions of higher dimensions independently by Barja [Bar] and Zhang [Zh1]. Let be a smooth projective variety of general type and of maximal Albanese dimension, then . A crucial feature in both proofs is that, by generic vanishing, one could regard as , where is a general numerically trivial line bundle, and hence . Note that this inequality gives a natural lower bound for when , however, could be [math] in dimension ([EL]).
A refined Severi’s inequality of surfaces was obtained by Lu and Zuo recently ([LZ]). They proved that , which is crucial in their classification of surfaces on the Severi line. In [BPS1], Barja, Pardini, and Stoppino introduced continuous rank functions on abelian varieties and proved several important results, including a simple proof of Barja and Zhang’s higher dimensional Severi’s inequality and various refinements of Severi’s inequality in all dimensions.
The two questions which we are interested in in this article are the followings.
- (1)
Does there exist Severi type inequalities on general irregular varieties ?
- (2)
Does there exist refined Severi type inequalities for varieties of maximal Albanese dimensions, taking into account the irregularities of the varieties ?
Note that Barja and Zhang have independently proved Severi type inequalities on varieties of Albanese fiber dimension one.
Theorem 1.1** (Barja [Bar]).**
Let be a morphism from a smooth projective variety of general type to an abelian variety. Assume that . Let be a connected component of a general fiber of . Then
[TABLE]
This result was improved by Zhang.
Theorem 1.2** (Zhang [Zh1]).**
Under the same assumption, let be the genus of , then
[TABLE]
In this article, we follow the method of Barja, Pardini, and Stoppino [BPS1], who applied continuous rank functions to study Severi type inequalities on varieties of maximal Albanese dimensions. In [JP], cohomological rank functions on abelian varieties, which are generalization of continuous rank functions, were defined and studied. Let be a polarized abelian variety of dimension and let be an object in the derived category of bounded complexes of coherent sheaves, the -th cohomological rank function is defined to be a continuous function
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
where , , and is a very general numerically trivial line bundle. In [JP], some basic properties of cohomological rank functions have been studied. We know that they are always continuous functions and we can compute the left and right derivatives at each rational point. Hence it is possible to apply these functions to study Severi type inequalities for general irregular varieties.
Let be a morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety and let be a connected component of a general fiber of over its image. Our main result is a Severi type inequality of which depends on Clifford or Noether type inequalities on . Here is one simple version and see Theorem 3.9 for the full statement.
Theorem 1.3**.**
Assume that the linear system induces a generically finite map of . Then
[TABLE]
Severi type inequalities naturally provide estimates of irregular varieties of general type. We know by the seminar work of Hacon-McKernan [HM], Takayama [T], Tsuji [Ts] that in each dimension , there exists a positive lower bound of the set of the volumes of smooth projective varieties of general type of dimension . In general this lower bound is quite difficult to compute due to the singularities of minimal models of varieties of general type in dimension . J.A. Chen and M. Chen proved that in [CC2]. We can also define the lower bound of the set of the volumes of irregular smooth projective varieties of general type of dimension . J.A. Chen and M. Chen showed that (see [CC1]).
Define to be the lower bound of the set of the volumes of smooth projective varieties of maximal Albanese dimension, of general type, and of dimension . Then we have the obvious bound
[TABLE]
It would be interesting to prove a similar lower bound for .
Our first application of Severi type inequality is to show that . In [BPS2], the authors studied varieties on the Severi line, namely and showed that is always a degree cover. With the help of this result, we can completely describe -dimensional varieties of maximal Albanese dimension with .
Theorem 1.4**.**
Assume that is a smooth projective variety of maximal Albanese dimension and of general type. Then . If the equality holds, then admits a principal polarization and the canonical model is a flat double cover of branched over a divisor .
We can also provide a better bound for , which is indeed close to the optimal bound.
Theorem 1.5**.**
.
Acknowledgements
We thank Fabrizio Catanese, Yong Hu, Martí Lahoz, Giuseppe Pareschi and Tong Zhang for stimulating conversations. We thank Olivier Debarre for reading the draft carefully. Parts of this work were written during the author’s visits to the Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences in the University of Tokyo and National Center for Theoretical Sciences in Taipei and we thank Jheng-Jie Chen, Jungkai Alfred Chen, Yoshinori Gongyo, and Yusuke Nakamura for the warm hospitality.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Maximal continuously globally generated subsheaves
Definition 2.1**.**
A coherent sheaf on an abelian variety is said to be continuously globally generated if for any open subset of , the evaluation map
[TABLE]
is surjective.
Remark 2.2**.**
Continuously globally generated sheaves were introduced by Pareschi and Popa in [PP1]. They proved that M-regular sheaves are indeed continuously globally generated. Debarre [D2] gave a nice characterization: a coherent sheaf is continuously globally generated if and only if there exists such that is globally generated for any . Moreover, a continuously globally generated sheaf is ample.
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let be a coherent sheaf on . Then there exists a continuously globally generated subsheaf of such that for general. Moreover, for any isogeny between abelian varieties, .
Proof.
Let be the open subset of consisting of such that takes the minimum value. Let be the image of the evaluation map
[TABLE]
Then it is clear that for general. It suffices to prove that is continuously globally generated. We just need to show that for any , the image of is exactly . Note that . Moreover, for , is the generic value. Hence by the semicontinuity theorem, for all , we still have . Thus the image of is the image of .
For the second statement, we note that and
[TABLE]
where general and . Hence . ∎
Definition 2.4**.**
We call the maximal continuously globally generated subsheaf of .
Remark 2.5**.**
By the decomposition theorems in [CJ] and [PPS], we know that given a morphism from a smooth projective morphism to an abelian variety, there exists a canonical decomposition
[TABLE]
where is either [math] or a M-regular sheaf on , are quotients between abelian varieties, are M-regular on and are torsion line bundles on . It is clear that .
Remark 2.6**.**
It is worth noting that M-regular sheaves are continuously globally generated but the converse is not true in general. The following is an example.
Let be the Abel-Jacobi embedding of a genus curve. Let be the theta divisor of . Then we know by [JP] that and for . This statement implies that for any integer, let be the pullback of be the isogeny . Then and .
Let and let be its maximal continuously globally generated subsheaf. Then for general. Note that the cokernel of is a [math]-dimensional sheaf. Hence for general. Thus is continuously globally generated but is not M-regular.
More generally, for a coherent sheaf on and a line bundle of , we consider the -twisted sheaf for as in [JP]. For such that , the sheaf is well-defined. Moreover, by Lemma 2.3, for any . Hence we will formally define upto abelian étale covers.
We will apply the following notations.
Given a primitive morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety. For any coherent sheaf on , we denote by the image of the natural map .
If is a line bundle on , we always take a birational modification such that is also locally free and hence is a nef line bundle. Indeed, is globally generated for some . Similarly, we can define for a line bundle on and , upto abelian étale covers and birational modifications.
2.2. The eventual maps
Definition 2.7**.**
Given a primitive morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety. Let be a line bundle on with non-zero. We denote by the relative evaluation map, where is the image of . We call the eventual map of (with respect to ).
By the following lemma, our definition of the eventual map is compatible with the one of Barja, Pardini, and Stoppino in [BPS1]. Following [BPS1], we will call the eventual paracanonical map of .
Lemma 2.8**.**
Let . Consider the étale base change
[TABLE]
Let be the natural evaluation map for general. Assume that is sufficiently large, is birationally equivalent to the base change by of .
Proof.
By assumption is not zero. Hence for general.
Let be the base change by of . Then is the relative evaluation map . By Lemma 2.3, we can regard as
[TABLE]
Since , we have a natural factorization of
[TABLE]
We just need to prove that is birational. Fix a very ample line bundle on and let be its class in Néron-Severi group, by [JP] we know from the continuity of cohomological rank functions that for sufficiently small, which means that for sufficiently large we have . Hence factors through . Moreover, by the main result [D2], we know that is globally generated for sufficiently large. Thus and are equivalent restricted on the generic point of . Hence and are birationally equivalent.
∎
Corollary 2.9**.**
.
The eventual maps of varieties with maximal Albanese dimension have been studied in [BPS3] and [J]. It turns out that the eventual paracanonical map of a variety of maximal Albanese dimension and of general type is often birational, except when the variety has some special irregular fibration structure. On the other hand, it seems difficult to say something general about the structures of the eventual paracanonical maps for varieties of higer dimensional Albanese fibers.
Lemma 2.10**.**
Let be a surface of general type, of Albanese fiber dimension . Let be a connected component of a general fiber of the Albanese morphsim. Then the eventual paracanonical map of is generically finite if .
Proof.
Let be the Albanese morphism of . If , then is a smooth curve of genus equal to and hence is M-regular. The eventual paracanonical map is then generically finite since the canonical map of is generically finite. We just need to deal with the case that is an elliptic curve. In this case, if is not generically finite, then by Remark 2.5, we know that the M-regular part of is a line bundle or [math]. On the other hand, . Since is an elliptic curve, Hence the M-regular part of is a line bundle on of degree . We may assume that is minimal, and by Xiao’s inequality [X, Lemma 2], we know that . Hence . ∎
Question 2.11**.**
Pignatelli constructed in [P] a minimal surface with and such that is the direct sum of an ample line bundle and a torsion line bundle. Hence the genus of a general fiber of the Albanese morphism is . We do not know any examples where the genus of a general fiber of the Albanese morphism equal to or . Is it possible to classify those surfaces with not generically finite ?
2.3. Volume functions and cohomological rank functions
In this article, we follow the idea in [BPS1] to compare the volume functions and the cohomological rank functions which are defined naturally on irregular varieties.
Let be a primitive morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety. Fix a very ample polarization on and denote by its class. Let be a big line bundle on . Let and . The volume functions have been studied in [BFJ, ELMNP]. The definition and some basic properties of the cohomological rank functions on abelian varieties can be found in [BPS1, JP].
Theorem 2.12**.**
Let be a smooth projective variety. Then the volume function is of class . Moreover, let be a big line bundle on , let be base point free with a general member, then , where is the restricted volume function.
The restricted volume function is quite complicated on the pseudo-effective cone of . However, since general, we know that if is big and nef, then ([ELMNP, Corollary 2.17]).
It follows from [JP] that is always continuous but is not necessarily of class in general. The differentiability of is a bit complicated. At each rational point, the left derivative and right derivative of exist. Assume is an effective divisor of a smooth projective variety . Let be a coherent sheaf on . We denote by the image of the restriction map and .
Proposition 2.13**.**
Let . Let be sufficiently big and divisible such that . Let be the isogeny induced by the multiplication by and consider the Cartesian diagram
[TABLE]
Since is primitive, is connected and both and are étale morphisms of degree . Let be a very general section of and let be very general. Then the right derivative at of the function is equal to
[TABLE]
and the left derivative is equal to
[TABLE]
Both functions are indeed not easy to compute. Assume that , we may replace by to compute its [math]-th cohomological rank function. Note that is well-defined upto abelian étale covers and birational modifications, hence is well-defined and
[TABLE]
where general and the last equality holds because is nef. Moreover, for any divisible by and general, we have
[TABLE]
Put the above inequalities together, we have
[TABLE]
On the other hand,
[TABLE]
for very general.
By (4) and (2.3), we can argue by induction on the dimension to compare the volume function and the cohomological rank function .
2.4. Clifford type inequalities
Clifford’s lemma on curve is probably the first result to compare the degrees and the dimensions of global sections of mobile divisors on smooth projective varieties. The following lemma is an application of Clifford’s lemma, which is probably known to experts.
Lemma 2.14**.**
Assume that is a smooth projective curve and let be a divisor on such that .
- (1)
If , then and if , ;
- (2)
if , then and equality holds only when is hyperelliptic;
- (3)
if is neither hyperelliptic nor trigonal and , then .
Proof.
Note that and follow directly from Riemann-Roch or Clifford’s lemma. We just need to deal with .
Since , we may and will assume that the linear system is base point free. Let be the morphism induced by . Since is neither hyperelliptic nor trigonal, .
If , Beauville showed in [B, Lemma 5.1] that if is birational, then ; if , there exists a double cover such that and ; if , then . In the first case, as is birational, we have . Hence , unless possibly and . If , we have . Hence . But if , then the arithmetic genus of in is and hence the geometric genus of is which is a contradiction. In the second case, we have , since is not hyperelliptic. In the last case, we always have , unless and and , which implies that is trigonal.
We then assume that . We may assume that , otherwise nothing needs to be proved. If , then we still have and hence , since . If , then . Since is not hyperelliptic, is not rational. Hence and . We then assume that is birational. If or , then
[TABLE]
If , consider , where is the fixed divisor of . We then apply refined Clifford’s lemma [ACGH, P137 B1],
[TABLE]
Combining this inequality with Riemann-Roch, we have and hence . ∎
In higher dimensions, we have less precise versions of Clifford type results.
Lemma 2.15**.**
Let be a smooth projective variety of dimension . Let be a base point free divisor on whose complete linear system induces a generically finite morphism of . Then
- (1)
;
- (2)
If is not uniruled and is birational, then
[TABLE]
- (3)
If is not uniruled, then and the equality holds if and only if is surjective and is of degree .
Proof.
Let . Note that is generically finite onto its image and is non-degenerate. Hence . Thus .
If is not ruled and is birational, we choose , general hyperplane section of and denote by its complete intersection. Then the global section of induces a birational morphism from C to a projective space . We denote by , , and let . By Castelnuovo’s bound, , where . On the other hand, . Here we applied the main result of [BDPP] which says that is not uniruled if and only if is pseudo-effective and hence . Hence . We conclude that .
Assume that is not ruled and is not birational, then and hence . If is birational, then by , we have . Combine these inequalities, we conclude that and the equality holds if and only if is surjective and is of degree . ∎
The following definitions appear naturally in our context.
Definition 2.16**.**
Let be a line bundle on a smooth projective variety . Assume that the global sections of define a generically finite map of . For all smooth birational model , we consider all divisors whose global sections define a generically finite map of and let to be the minimum of of all such and let be the minimum of of all such , where is a general positive dimensional subvariety of . Here a general subvariety means a subvariety which passes through a general point of and hence its deformation dominates .
Moreover, we define (resp. ) to be the minimum of (resp. ) for all line bundles , whose global sections define a generically finite map of .
By Lemma 2.15, if is not uniruled, then and .
For convention, we will let when .
These birational invariants are related to the irrationality degree and the covering gonality (see [BDELU]). We recall that the irrationality degree of is defined to be
[TABLE]
and the covering gonality is defined to be
[TABLE]
It is clear that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Indeed, we have
Lemma 2.17**.**
.
Proof.
After birational modifications, we may assume that a base point free divisor on computes , namely . If , then . If not, let be the morphism induced by the global sections of , where . Let . Then choose general points on and take the projection from these points. We get a map of degree from to . Hence . We note that
[TABLE]
Thus if , we have and if , then . ∎
Remark 2.18**.**
In [BDELU], the authors studied the irrationality degrees and the covering degrees of very general hypersurfaces in projective spaces. They showed that if is a smooth hypersurface of degree in , then and if is a very general hypersurface in of degree , then .
3. Higher dimensional Severi type inequalities
3.1. General line bundles
In this section, we prove Severi type inequalities for general line bundles on an irregular variety .
We consider a primitive morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety. Let be the Stein factorization of . We assume that a general fiber of is , , and .
Theorem 3.1**.**
Under the above assumptions, let be a line bundle on such that is big. Then
[TABLE]
where general. In particular, and if is not uniruled.
Proof.
Let and . Let
[TABLE]
By assumption, we know that .
Note that when , the above inequality comes from the usual Severi’s inequality due to Barja [Bar] and Zhang [Zh1]. If , we can conclude simply by the definition of . We then argue by double inductions on and . Assume that Theorem 3.1 has been proved when or . Let
[TABLE]
for all . Then by Lemma 2.17, and if is not uniruled.
For rational, we have by (4) and (2.3) that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Since remains big on , so is on . Hence by induction, for all . Thus we take integration from to [math] and have that
[TABLE]
After a small perturbation of , we may assume that . If , nothing needs to be proved. Otherwise, . Take sufficiently large and divisible and consider the commutative diagram:
[TABLE]
where is the eventual map of . By Lemma 2.8, where is a line bundle on , , and
[TABLE]
After birational modifications, we may also assume that is smooth. By the induction of , we have
[TABLE]
Note that by the definition of , for any sufficiently small. After replacing by its multiple, we may assume that is a line bundle on and its eventual map is then generically finite. Thus
[TABLE]
Note that is still a connected component of a general fiber of . Hence a connected component of some general fiber of is a general subvariety of . Moreover, the linear system of defines a generically finite map of . In particular, . Hence
[TABLE]
and thus
[TABLE]
By the continuity of volume functions, we conclude that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
∎
Remark 3.2**.**
Let . It is clear that under the assumption of Theorem 3.1, we have .
Remark 3.3**.**
If satisfies certain stable condition, the proof of Theorem 3.1 gives a stronger inequality for . For instance, it is easy to see that the following statement can be proved by the same argument:
Assume that is a surjective morphism to an elliptic curve, is big, and is a semistable vector bundle on , then
[TABLE]
When , the general fiber is a curve.
Corollary 3.4**.**
Let be a morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety and . Denote by the gonality of a connected component of a general fiber of . Let be a big line bundle on such that is also big. Then
- (1)
;
- (2)
if ,
- (3)
if and is neither hyperelliptic nor trigonal, and , then
Proof.
We conclude by combining Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 2.14. ∎
Similarly, if be a morphism from a smooth projective variety to an abelian variety and a general fiber is a very general smooth hypersurface of degree in . Then, we have
Corollary 3.5**.**
Let be a line bundle on such that is big, we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Remark 2.18, we know that and . Hence by Lemma 2.17, and we also have . We then conclude by Theorem 3.1. ∎
In practice, we also need to deal with big line bundles whose continuously globally generated part is not big. In this case, we denote by
[TABLE]
the eventual map of and let be a general fiber of .
Proposition 3.6**.**
Then , for general.
Proof.
By the construction of the eventual map, we may assume that is smooth and there exists a nef line bundle on such that and . Then . On the other hand, we know by [ELMNP, Proposition 2.11 and Theorem 2.13] that we can compute the volume or restricted volume of a line bundle by the asymptotic intersection number and the Fujita approximation holds for the restricted volumes. To be more precise, for any , after birational modifications, there exists a decomposition , where is an ample -divisor and is an effective -divisor such that . We then conclude that
[TABLE]
∎
Remark 3.7**.**
We could compare the above proposition with a different result. Assume that is a fibration between smooth projective varieties of general type with a general fiber . Then Kawamata [ZhD, Theorem 7.1] showed that
[TABLE]
The main ingredient for such a nice bound is Viehweg’s weak positivity of .
Example 3.8**.**
We consider the following example of Fletcher: a general degree hypersurface. Then has only terminal isolated singularities and . Let be a smooth model of , then and . Let , where is a genus curve. Then and . This example seems to contradict Corollary B of [Bar].
3.2. Canonical bundle and pluri-canonical bundle
When the line bundle is the canonical or pluricanonical bundles, we can often drop the condition on the bigness condition of , due to the positivity of .
Theorem 3.9**.**
Let be a morphism from a smooth projective -dimensional variety to an abelian variety with a connected component of a general fiber of . Assume that .
- (1)
If induces a generically finite map of . Then
[TABLE]
- (2)
If induces a map, whose general fiber is of dimension , then
[TABLE]
- (3)
If induces a generically finite map of , for some integer , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof is almost a direct application of Theorem 3.1. For , we need an extra ingredient. By the decomposition theorem in Remark (1), we know that is M-regular and hence is continuously globally generated for all sufficiently small. By the assumption that induces a generically finite map of , we conclude that is big and thus we can apply Theorem 3.1 to conclude that for general. Let , we finish the proof of .
The proof of is similar. By the decomposition theorem, is M-regular and hence the eventual map of induces the canonical map of . Hence we apply Proposition 3.6 to conclude.
For , we simply note that is IT0 (see for instance [LPS]) and hence is M-regular and we conclude directly by Theorem 3.1.
∎
Combining Corollary 3.4 and Theorem 3.9, we have
Corollary 3.10**.**
Assume that is a curve of genus , then
[TABLE]
If is neither hyperelliptic nor trigonal, then
[TABLE]
If is a generic curve of genus , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Only the last part needs to be explained. Indeed, if is a generic curve of genus , then . Hence we conclude by Corollary 3.4 and Theorem 3.9. ∎
Corollary 3.11**.**
Assume that is a surface of general type. Then
[TABLE]
Furthermore, unless that , we will always have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We apply Theorem 3.9. Note that if , then nothing needs to be proved.
If is generically finite, then by (1) of Theorem 3.9, .
If induces a map to a curve, and let be a general pencil of . By (2) of Theorem 3.9, . Let be the morphism from to its minimal model. Then . By Noether’s inequality ([BHP, Chapter VII, Theorem 3.1]), we know that . Hence we conclude by Hodge index that , unless and . If , then .
∎
Corollary 3.12**.**
Assume that is a very general hypersurface of degree in , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
This is a corollary of Theorem 3.9 and Corollary 3.5. ∎
4. Irregular varieties with small volumes
Severi type inequalities provide a way to estimate the volumes of irregular varieties. Note that varieties of general type in dimension could have rather small volumes due to the singularities of their minimal models. A general hypersurface is a minimal threefold with volume . On the other hand, Chen and Chen proved in [CC1] that if is an irregular -fold, then . We will study in this section irregular varieties with small volumes via the Severi type inequalities proved in last section.
4.1. Varieties of maximal Albanese dimension
Let be an abelian variety. We will denote by the Fourier-Mukai transform induced by the normalized Poincaré line bundle on .
Proposition 4.1**.**
Let be a smooth projective variety of maximal Albanese dimension with and . Then the canononical model is a flat double cover of a princiaplly polarized abelian variety branched over a divisor .
Proof.
Since , by [BPS1], we know that is surjective and is of degree . Let , where is a rank one torsion-free sheaf. Let . We just need to show that the double dual of is a theta divisor. Indeed, is normal and is a double cover of , hence it is Gorenstein and . If is a theta divisor, by the assumption that , we conclude that and hence is a theta divisor on . Thus we have . Hence has canonical singularities and is the canonical model of .
We now write , where is an ample line bundle on . The idea is to compare the two functions and . By [BPS2, Page 11, proof of Theorem 1.2], we know that for . Note that , hence . Since is also M-regular, we know that is a shifted rank torsion-free sheaf by [PP2, Corollary 3.2]. Hence is a line bundle (see for instance [PP3, Lemma 2.2]). Let be the isogeny induced by . Then, from the short exact sequence
[TABLE]
we conclude that is a negative line bundle. Indeed, is effective. By the main result of [JP], we know that
[TABLE]
for sufficiently close to [math]. On the other hand, also factors through the canonical model of . We write . Then
[TABLE]
for sufficiently close to [math]. Comparing the coefficients of and , we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Note that we have the natural birational morphism , hence . Thus . Hence is algebraically equivalent to . Note that , where . Hence and we conclude that and is a theta divisor. ∎
Corollary 4.2**.**
Let be a smooth projective variety of general type with maximal Albanese dimension. Then and equality holds if and only if the canonical model of is a flat double cover of a principally polarized abelian variety branched over a divisor .
Proof.
By the last proposition, we just need to deal with the case that .
When , by the main result of [CDJ], the canonical model is a flat cover, there exists an isogeny and , where are line bundles on whose Iitaka fibration is the natural morphism , where . Moreover, is a line bundle. We conclude that .
In higher dimensions, such characterization is not available. Let . We argue by induction on dimensions to prove that when .
Assume that for all smooth projective of maximal Albanese dimension and of general type of dimension , and . We apply Setting 3.2 of [JLT] of . Namely, there exists a codimension- component of with maximal, where is an abelian subvariety of , is a torsion line bundle and is the corresponding point. Taking the natural quotient and taking Stein factorization, we have the following commutative diagram
[TABLE]
where after birational modifications, all varieties are smooth. Let be a general fiber of . Note that by [JLT], we know that there are two cases, either is the trivial line bundle or is torsion and non-trivial.
If is the trivial line bundle, then is of general type. Hence by Kawamata’s result [ZhD, Theorem 7.1], Hence by induction, we have in this case.
In the second case, is a fibration. We know that is the neutral component of . We take a finite group such that and . Let be the étale cover induced by and let be the corresponding base change and let be the Stein factorization of the natural morphism . After birational modifications, we may assume that is smooth. We have the commutative diagram
[TABLE]
Then is still a general fiber of and is a birational -cover and
[TABLE]
where and is M-regular for all non-zero due to the maximality of (see [JLT, Section 3]). Hence and Hence
[TABLE]
Note that if , then , , and . In the following we will argue by contradiction to see that we cannot have all the equalities.
By induction, the canonical model of is a flat double cover of branched over , where is a principal polarization on . Let be the kernel of . By the construction of , the natural morphism is primitive. Hence and is of degree . Thus is of degree and there exists a birational involution acting on whose restriction on is the canonical involution.
We claim that is indeed a birationally -cover. Indeed, since , the decomposition of has a special form. Indeed, . By the same argument as above, we conclude that each direct summand of is indeed a nef line bundle and hence after possibly a further abelian étale cover, has independent involutions. Thus is indeed a birationally -cover. Hence so is . But since is a fibration, we conclude that is a birationally -cover of the kernel of , which is obviously a contradiction to the assumption that . ∎
4.2. Irregular threefolds
For general irregular varieties, the picture is not clear. We focus on irregular threefolds and have some partial results.
Proposition 4.3**.**
Let be a -fold of general type, of Albanese fiber dimension . Then .
Proof.
By Corollary 3.10, for general. We still need to deal with the case that for general. In this case, the M-regular part of is [math]. By [JS], we know that the translates through the origin of all irreducible component of generate . Hence is surjective and contains torsion translates of at least two different elliptic curves.
We may write , where are ample vector bundles on and are torsion line bundles. Let , , . Then is a vector bundle on , which is the direct sum of and some torsion line bundles on . In particular, for general.
Moreover, we see that a general fiber of is an irregular surface, where . We consider the corresponding fiber of . Hence has a direct summand . Hence an abelian étale cover of is of maximal Albanese dimension. The Severi inequality for surfaces holds for . In particular, by a small variant of Corollary 3.11, we have for general. Hence .
∎
Theorem 4.4**.**
Let be an irregular threefold, then .
Proof.
By Proposition 4.1 and Proposition 4.3, we just need to deal with the case that is of Albanese fiber dimension . By Corollary 3.11, if for general, then . Hence we will assume that and in particular, is a fibration onto an elliptic curve. Let be a general fiber of .
We first assume that induces a generically finite map of . Then by Theorem 3.1,
[TABLE]
If , we are done.
If not, is a degree vector bundle on . Hence is stable and we may apply the observation in Remark 3.3 to conclude that
[TABLE]
We just need to show that . If , then by Noether’s inequality, and if , by Debarre’s inequality [D1], . Hence if , . If , we have unless and . In this case, .
If is not generically finite, then by [BHP, Section VII, Theorem 7.4, Theorem 7.6], we know that and . We also know that a general fiber of the map of is a curve with genus or (see [CP, Theorem 5.1]) and hence the linear system has no base divisors and , where is the morphism from to its minimal model. Hence by Proposition 3.6, . In this case, . Hence . ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[ACGH] Arbarello, E.; Cornalba, M.; Griffiths, P. A.; Harris, J. Geometry of algebraic curves. Vol. I. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 267. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.
- 2[Bar] Barja, Miguel Ángel. Generalized Clifford-Severi inequality and the volume of irregular varieties. Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), no. 3, 541–-568.
- 3[BDELU] Bastianelli, Francesco; De Poi, Pietro; Ein, Lawrence; Lazarsfeld, Robert; Ullery, Brooke. Measures of irrationality for hypersurfaces of large degree. Compos. Math. 153 (2017), no. 11, 2368–2393.
- 4[B] Beauville, Arnaud. L’application canonique pour les surfaces de type général. Invent. Math. 55 (1979), no. 2, 121–140.
- 5[BDPP] Boucksom, Sébastien; Demailly, Jean-Pierre; Păun, Mihai; Peternell, Thomas. The pseudo-effective cone of a compact Kähler manifold and varieties of negative Kodaira dimension. J. Algebraic Geom. 22 (2013), no. 2, 201–248.
- 6[BHP] Barth, Wolf P.; Hulek, Klaus; Peters, Chris A. M.; Van de Ven, Antonius Compact complex surfaces. Second edition. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], 4. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
- 7[BFJ] Boucksom, Sébastien; Favre, Charles; Jonsson, Mattias. Differentiability of volumes of divisors and a problem of Teissier. J. Algebraic Geom. 18 (2009), no. 2, 279–-308.
- 8[BPS 1] Barja, Miguel Ángel; Pardini, Rita; Stoppino, Lidia. Linear systems on irregular varieties, ar Xiv:1606.03290.
