# Which Factorization Machine Modeling is Better: A Theoretical Answer   with Optimal Guarantee

**Authors:** Ming Lin, Shuang Qiu, Jieping Ye, Xiaomin Song, Qi Qian, Liang Sun,, Shenghuo Zhu, Rong Jin

arXiv: 1901.11149 · 2019-02-01

## TL;DR

This paper provides a theoretical analysis of factorization machines, improving their learning guarantees to near-optimal levels under certain data conditions and demonstrating their effectiveness in GPS signal calibration.

## Contribution

It tightens the sampling complexity bounds for generalized FM models towards optimality and shows the redundancy of the positive semi-definite constraint.

## Key findings

- Improved sampling complexity bounds for generalized FM models.
- Optimal bounds achieved when excluding second order self-interaction terms.
- Validated superiority of the proposed FM model in GPS signal calibration.

## Abstract

Factorization machine (FM) is a popular machine learning model to capture the second order feature interactions. The optimal learning guarantee of FM and its generalized version is not yet developed. For a rank $k$ generalized FM of $d$ dimensional input, the previous best known sampling complexity is $\mathcal{O}[k^{3}d\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(kd)]$ under Gaussian distribution. This bound is sub-optimal comparing to the information theoretical lower bound $\mathcal{O}(kd)$. In this work, we aim to tighten this bound towards optimal and generalize the analysis to sub-gaussian distribution. We prove that when the input data satisfies the so-called $\tau$-Moment Invertible Property, the sampling complexity of generalized FM can be improved to $\mathcal{O}[k^{2}d\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(kd)/\tau^{2}]$. When the second order self-interaction terms are excluded in the generalized FM, the bound can be improved to the optimal $\mathcal{O}[kd\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(kd)]$ up to the logarithmic factors. Our analysis also suggests that the positive semi-definite constraint in the conventional FM is redundant as it does not improve the sampling complexity while making the model difficult to optimize. We evaluate our improved FM model in real-time high precision GPS signal calibration task to validate its superiority.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.11149/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.11149/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.11149/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.11149