Quantifying the Value of Real-time Geodetic Constraints for Earthquake Early Warning using a Global Seismic and Geodetic Dataset
C. J. Ruhl, D. Melgar, A. I. Chung, R. Grapenthin, and R. M. Allen

TL;DR
This study compares seismic and geodetic earthquake early warning systems, demonstrating that geodetic data significantly improves warning accuracy and timeliness for large earthquakes, enhancing early warning effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative comparison showing geodetic constraints improve magnitude estimation and warning times in EEW systems over seismic-only methods.
Findings
Geodetic EEW reduces missed alerts by over 30%.
G-larmS provides longer median warning times than ElarmS.
Geodetic data improves magnitude accuracy and ground motion estimates.
Abstract
Geodetic earthquake early warning (EEW) algorithms complement point-source seismic systems by estimating fault-finiteness and unsaturated moment magnitude for the largest, most damaging earthquakes. Because such earthquakes are rare, it has been difficult to demonstrate that geodetic warnings improve ground motion estimation significantly. Here, we quantify and compare timeliness and accuracy of magnitude and ground motion estimates in simulated real time from seismic and geodetic observations for a suite of globally-distributed, large earthquakes. Magnitude solutions saturate for the seismic EEW algorithm (we use ElarmS) while the ElarmS-triggered Geodetic Alarm System (G-larmS) reduces the error even for its first solutions. Shaking intensity (MMI) time series calculated for each station and each event are assessed based on MMI-threshold crossings, allowing us to accurately…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
