On the coefficient of The $n^{th}$ Cesaro mean of order $\alpha$ of bi-univalent functions
Adnan Ghazy AlAmoush

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new subclass of bi-univalent functions in the unit disk and provides coefficient estimates for the second and third coefficients, advancing the understanding of their geometric properties.
Contribution
It defines a novel subclass of bi-univalent functions and derives new bounds for their initial coefficients, extending existing coefficient estimate theories.
Findings
Derived bounds for |a_2| and |a_3| coefficients
Introduced a new subclass of bi-univalent functions
Provided preliminary results related to the subclass
Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to introduce a new subclasses of the function class of bi-univalent functions defined in the open unit disc. Furthermore, we obtain estimates on the coefficients and for functions of this class. Some results related to this work will be briefly indicated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFunctional Equations Stability Results · Analytic and geometric function theory · Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
On the coefficient of The Cesaro mean of order
of bi- univalent functions
Adnan Ghazy Alamoush
Abstract.
The purpose of the present paper is to introduce a new subclasses of the function class of bi-univalent functions defined in the open unit disc. Furthermore, we obtain estimates on the coefficients and for functions of this class. Some results related to this work will be briefly indicated.
1. Introduction
Let denote the class of the functions of the form
[TABLE]
which are analytic in the open unit disc } and satisfy the normalization condition . Let be the subclass of A consisting of functions of the form (1) which are also univalent in .
A function is said to be in the class of strongly bi-starlike functions of order , denoted by , if each of the following conditions is satisfied:
and
where is the extension of to (for details see ( Brannan and Taha [1]). And is said to be in the class of strongly bi-convex functions of order , denoted by , if it satisfies the following inequality
.
and
.
Where is the extension of to . Recall that the Koebe one-quarter theorem [2] ensures that the image of under every univalent function contains a disk of radius . Thus every univalent function has an inverse satisfying , and
, .
[TABLE]
In recent years, many authors discussed estimate on the coefficients and for subclasses of bi-univalent function (see for example [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]).
Let be an analytic function on having taylor expansion with , A function is bi-univalent in if both and are univalent in .
The object of the present paper is to introduce a new subclasses of the function class and to find estimates on the coefficients and for new functions in these new subclasses of the function class .
We say that is The Cesaro mean of order of is defined by
where
A_{n}={\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-n\\ k-n\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-n\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}},\ a_{1}=1.
Let denote the open unit disk in . It is well known that outer functions are zero-free on the unit disk. Outer functions, which play an important role in theory to find a suitable finite (polynomial) approximation for the outer infinite series so that the approximant reduces the zero-free property of , arise in the characteristic equation which determines the stability of certain nonlinear systems of differential equations. Recall that an outer function is a function of the form
where , is in and is in . See [9] for the definitions and classical properties of outer functions. Since any function in which has in is an outer function, then typical examples of outer functions can be generated by functions of the form for .
We observe for outer functions that the standard Taylor approximants do not, in general, retain the zero-free property of . It was shown in [10] that the Taylor approximating polynomials to outer functions can vanish in the unit disk. By using convolution methods that the classical Cesaro means, retains the zero-free property of the derivatives of bounded convex functions in the unit disk. The classical Cesaro means play an important role in geometric function theory (see [11],[12]).
Lemma 1.1**.**
If then for each , where is the family of all functions analytic in for which , then
.
2. COEFFICIENT BOUNDS FOR THE FUNCTION CLASS
In the sequel, it is assumed that . is an analytic function with positive real part in the unit disk , satisfying , and is symmetric with respect to the real axis. Such a function has a Taylor series of the form
[TABLE]
Suppose that and are analytic in the unit disk D with , , and suppose that
[TABLE]
It is well known that
[TABLE]
By a simple calculation, we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
[13]** A function is said to be in the class if and only if
,
where .
Theorem 2.2**.**
If given by (1) is in the class , then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let and . Where . Then there are analytic functions given by (4) such that
[TABLE]
since
[TABLE]
it follows from (6), (7), (10) and (11) that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
From (12) and (14), we get
[TABLE]
By adding (15) to (13), further computations using (12) and (16) lead to
[TABLE]
Also, from (16) and (17), together with (5), we obtain
[TABLE]
From (12) and (18) we get
|a_{2}|\leq\left|\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-2\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-2\\ k-2\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right|\frac{B_{1}\sqrt{B_{1}}}{\sqrt{[|3B^{2}_{1}-4B_{2}|+4B_{1}]}}.
Which, in view of the well-known inequalities and for functions with positive real part, gives us the desired estimate on as asserted in (8). By subtracting (15) from (13), further computations using (12) and (16) lead to
[TABLE]
From (5), (12), (16) and (19), it follows that
|a_{3}|\leq\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-3\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right]\left[(1-\frac{4}{3B_{1}})\frac{B^{3}_{1}}{{[|3B^{2}_{1}-4B_{2}|+4B_{1}]}}+\frac{B_{1}}{3}\right].
∎
3. COEFFICIENT BOUNDS FOR THE FUNCTION CLASS
Definition 3.1**.**
*A function given by (1) is said to be in the class if the following conditions are satisfied: For
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where the function defined by (2).
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let the function given by (1) be in the class , . Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
From (20) and (21), we can write
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and in and , and have the forms
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Now, equating the coefficients in (24) and (25), we obtain
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
From (28) and (30), we obtain
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Now, from (29), (31) and (33), we obtain
Therefore we have
Applying Lemma 1.1 for the coefficients and , we immediately have
|a_{2}|\leq 2\alpha\left|\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-2\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-2\\ k-2\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right|\frac{{1}}{\sqrt{4^{k}(1+\lambda)^{2}+\alpha[2.3^{k}(1+\lambda)-4^{k}(1+\lambda)^{2}]}}.
This gives the bound as asserted in (22).
Next, in order to find the bound on , we subtract (29) from (31) and obtain
=
,
a_{3}=\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-3\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right]\left[\frac{\alpha(p_{2}-q_{2})}{2(1+2\lambda)}+\frac{\alpha^{2}(p^{2}_{1}+q^{2}_{1})}{2(1+\lambda)^{2}}\right],
Applying Lemma 1.1 for the coefficients and , we immediately have
|a_{3}|\leq\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-3\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right]\left[\frac{2\alpha}{(1+2\lambda)}+\frac{4\alpha^{2}}{(1+\lambda)^{2}}\right].
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.2. ∎
4. COEFFICIENT BOUNDS FOR THE FUNCTION CLASS
Definition 4.1**.**
A function given by (1) is said to be in the class if the following conditions are satisfied: For
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where the function defined by (2).
Theorem 4.2**.**
. Let given by (1) be in the class and Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
. It follows from (34) and (35) that there exists such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where , and have the forms
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
respectively. Equating coefficients in (38) and (39) yields
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
From (42) and (44), we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Also, from (43) and (45), we find that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
which is the bound on as given in (36).
Next, in order to find the bound on by subtracting (45) from (43), we obtain
or, equivalently
Upon substituting the value of from (47), we obtain
.
Applying Lemma 1.1 for the coefficients and we obtain
|a_{3}|\leq\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\frac{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-1\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}{\left({\begin{array}[]{c}k+\alpha-3\\ k-3\end{array}}\right)}\end{array}\right]\left[\frac{4(1-\beta)^{2}}{(1+\lambda)^{2}}+\frac{2(1-\beta)}{(1+2\lambda)}\right].
which is the bound on as asserted in (37). ∎
Remark**.**
1. For all , and in Theorems 2.2, we obtain the corresponding results due to Zhigang and Qiuqiu [14]
Remark**.**
2. For all , and in Theorems 3.2 and 4.2, we obtain the corresponding results due to Frasin and Aouf [4].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Brannan D. A. , Taha T. S., On some classes of bi-univalent functions , in: S.M. Mazhar, A. Hamoui, N.S. Faour (Eds.), Math. Anal. and Appl., Kuwait; February 18–21, 1985, in: KFAS Proceedings Series, vol. 3, Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford, 1988, pp. 53–60. see also Studia Univ. Babe-Bolyai Math., 31 (2) (1986): 70-77.
- 2[2] Duren P. L., Univalent Functions , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
- 3[3] Srivastava H. M. , Mishra A. K., and Gochhayat P., Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions , Appl. Math. Lett., 23 (2010): 1188-1192.
- 4[4] Frasin B. A., Aouf M. K., New subclasses of bi-univalent functions , Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011): 1569-1573.
- 5[5] Alamoush A. G., Darus M., Coefficient bound for new subclasses of bi-univalent functions using Hadamard product , Acta Univ. Apul., 18 (2) (2014): 153-161.
- 6[6] Alamoush A. G., Darus M., On coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions of fox-wright functions , Far East Jour. Math. Sci., 89 (2) (2014): 249 - 262.
- 7[7] Alamoush A. G., Darus M., On coefficient estimates for new generalized subclasses of bi-univalent functions , AIP Conf. Proc., 1614, 844 (2014).
- 8[8] Alamoush A. G., Coefficient estimates for certain subclass of bi functions associated the Horadam polynomials , ar Xiv: 1812.10589 (2019).
