# Short-term Demand Forecasting for Online Car-hailing Services using   Recurrent Neural Networks

**Authors:** Alireza Nejadettehad, Hamid Mahini, Behnam Bahrak

arXiv: 1901.10821 · 2019-01-31

## TL;DR

This paper compares different types of recurrent neural networks for short-term demand forecasting in online car-hailing services, finding that simpler RNNs like GRU outperform LSTM in accuracy and efficiency.

## Contribution

The study evaluates and compares simple RNN, GRU, and LSTM models for traffic flow prediction, highlighting the effectiveness of simpler RNNs over LSTM.

## Key findings

- All RNN types outperform traditional models like DEMA, LASSO, and XGBoost.
- Simple RNN and GRU models achieve higher accuracy and faster training than LSTM.
- GRU models strike a good balance between performance and computational efficiency.

## Abstract

Short-term traffic flow prediction is one of the crucial issues in intelligent transportation system, which is an important part of smart cities. Accurate predictions can enable both the drivers and the passengers to make better decisions about their travel route, departure time and travel origin selection, which can be helpful in traffic management. Multiple models and algorithms based on time series prediction and machine learning were applied to this issue and achieved acceptable results. Recently, the availability of sufficient data and computational power, motivates us to improve the prediction accuracy via deep-learning approaches. Recurrent neural networks have become one of the most popular methods for time series forecasting, however, due to the variety of these networks, the question that which type is the most appropriate one for this task remains unsolved. In this paper, we use three kinds of recurrent neural networks including simple RNN units, GRU and LSTM neural network to predict short-term traffic flow. The dataset from TAP30 Corporation is used for building the models and comparing RNNs with several well-known models, such as DEMA, LASSO and XGBoost. The results show that all three types of RNNs outperform the others, however, more simple RNNs such as simple recurrent units and GRU perform work better than LSTM in terms of accuracy and training time.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10821/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10821/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10821/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10821