Numerically Recovering the Critical Points of a Deep Linear Autoencoder

TL;DR

This paper evaluates methods for numerically locating critical points in deep linear autoencoders, revealing limitations in sampling and tolerance, and highlighting a Newton method that improves critical point identification.

Contribution

It systematically assesses existing critical point-finding methods in deep linear autoencoders and introduces insights into their effectiveness and limitations.

Findings

Methods recover some surface information but are biased in sampling.

Strict numerical tolerances are necessary for accurate critical point identification.

A Newton method outperforms previous approaches in finding critical points.

Abstract

Numerically locating the critical points of non-convex surfaces is a long-standing problem central to many fields. Recently, the loss surfaces of deep neural networks have been explored to gain insight into outstanding questions in optimization, generalization, and network architecture design. However, the degree to which recently-proposed methods for numerically recovering critical points actually do so has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this paper, we examine this issue in a case for which the ground truth is known: the deep linear autoencoder. We investigate two sub-problems associated with numerical critical point identification: first, because of large parameter counts, it is infeasible to find all of the critical points for contemporary neural networks, necessitating sampling approaches whose characteristics are poorly understood; second, the numerical tolerance for accurately identifying a critical point is unknown, and conservative tolerances are difficult to satisfy. We first identify connections between recently-proposed methods and well-understood methods in other fields, including chemical physics, economics, and algebraic geometry. We find that several methods work well at recovering certain information about loss surfaces, but fail to take an unbiased sample of critical points. Furthermore, numerical tolerance must be very strict to ensure that numerically-identified critical points have similar properties to true analytical critical points. We also identify a recently-published Newton method for optimization that outperforms previous methods as a critical point-finding algorithm. We expect our results will guide future attempts to numerically study critical points in large nonlinear neural networks.