# General Fair Empirical Risk Minimization

**Authors:** Luca Oneto, Michele Donini, Massimiliano Pontil

arXiv: 1901.10080 · 2019-12-30

## TL;DR

This paper extends fair empirical risk minimization to regression with continuous sensitive attributes, providing a unified framework, theoretical guarantees, and a practical convex estimator tested on real datasets.

## Contribution

It introduces a generalized fairness measure for regression, derives statistical guarantees, and develops a convex kernel-based estimator applicable to real-world data.

## Key findings

- The estimator effectively reduces unfair bias in regression.
- It maintains a good balance between accuracy and fairness.
- Experimental results demonstrate its practical effectiveness.

## Abstract

We tackle the problem of algorithmic fairness, where the goal is to avoid the unfairly influence of sensitive information, in the general context of regression with possible continuous sensitive attributes. We extend the framework of fair empirical risk minimization to this general scenario, covering in this way the whole standard supervised learning setting. Our generalized fairness measure reduces to well known notions of fairness available in literature. We derive learning guarantees for our method, that imply in particular its statistical consistency, both in terms of the risk and the fairness measure. We then specialize our approach to kernel methods and propose a convex fair estimator in that setting. We test the estimator on a commonly used benchmark dataset (Communities and Crime) and on a new dataset collected at the University of Genova, containing the information of the academic career of five thousand students. The latter dataset provides a challenging real case scenario of unfair behaviour of standard regression methods that benefits from our methodology. The experimental results show that our estimator is effective at mitigating the trade-off between accuracy and fairness requirements.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10080/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10080/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10080/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1901.10080